<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSI tosses FX600 onto market at surprisingly low price</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/msi-tosses-fx600-onto-market-at-surprisingly-low-price-1797939/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/msi-tosses-fx600-onto-market-at-surprisingly-low-price-1797939/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 15:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnderDoc</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/msi-tosses-fx600-onto-market-at-surprisingly-low-price-1797939/#comment-66096</link>
		<dc:creator>UnderDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=97939#comment-66096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thing that isn&#039;t clear from the review is that the display resolution is a mere 1366x768, or 720p -- that is hardly hi-end. I wouldn&#039;t expect a higher price tag without at least 900p.

By the way, the physical dimensions of the screen are a lot less informative than the pixel count, yet the latter was annoyingly missing from both this review and one at another tech blog... I had to go to Newegg to find out...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that isn&#8217;t clear from the review is that the display resolution is a mere 1366&#215;768, or 720p &#8212; that is hardly hi-end. I wouldn&#8217;t expect a higher price tag without at least 900p.</p>
<p>By the way, the physical dimensions of the screen are a lot less informative than the pixel count, yet the latter was annoyingly missing from both this review and one at another tech blog&#8230; I had to go to Newegg to find out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
