<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MobClix Says Apple iOS Users More Valuable Than Android Users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/mobclix-says-apple-ios-users-more-valuable-than-android-users-16134197/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/mobclix-says-apple-ios-users-more-valuable-than-android-users-16134197/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 01:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alberto Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/mobclix-says-apple-ios-users-more-valuable-than-android-users-16134197/#comment-96285</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberto Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=134197#comment-96285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve never even seen MobClix used on Android.  What a bogus study.

Everyone who makes an android app uses AdMob because it&#039;s stupid easy to integrate.  So is MobClix using some big ticket names in iOS apps and comparing them to some retarded app on Android that HAPPENS to use their advertisements (that they probably wrote themselves so that they can say they have an app on Android)?

I call garbage.  Call me back when MobClix tells us which titles actually use their ads.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never even seen MobClix used on Android.  What a bogus study.</p>
<p>Everyone who makes an android app uses AdMob because it&#8217;s stupid easy to integrate.  So is MobClix using some big ticket names in iOS apps and comparing them to some retarded app on Android that HAPPENS to use their advertisements (that they probably wrote themselves so that they can say they have an app on Android)?</p>
<p>I call garbage.  Call me back when MobClix tells us which titles actually use their ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BelindaGil</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/mobclix-says-apple-ios-users-more-valuable-than-android-users-16134197/#comment-95292</link>
		<dc:creator>BelindaGil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=134197#comment-95292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s no reason why this shouldn&#039;t be. Why even bother with Apple? I mean this from a developer&#039;s standpoint, where Apple gets a cut of the profits. Then there&#039;s the subscriptions fees, which again, Apple is getting a cut of. Can you blame them though? You can&#039;t beat the fact that Apple has the most Apps and their app store is the most popular.


This is why I go to GiveMeApps. com instead and call it a night. Its non native and I can search for apps from anywhere for all devices, not just apple. When I upload my apps and links, I get to keep 100% of my hard earned profits. It&#039;s a win win. 
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no reason why this shouldn&#8217;t be. Why even bother with Apple? I mean this from a developer&#8217;s standpoint, where Apple gets a cut of the profits. Then there&#8217;s the subscriptions fees, which again, Apple is getting a cut of. Can you blame them though? You can&#8217;t beat the fact that Apple has the most Apps and their app store is the most popular.</p>
<p>This is why I go to GiveMeApps. com instead and call it a night. Its non native and I can search for apps from anywhere for all devices, not just apple. When I upload my apps and links, I get to keep 100% of my hard earned profits. It&#8217;s a win win. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/mobclix-says-apple-ios-users-more-valuable-than-android-users-16134197/#comment-95271</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=134197#comment-95271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[more valuable ..of course look at the prices]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more valuable ..of course look at the prices</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fanboi</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/mobclix-says-apple-ios-users-more-valuable-than-android-users-16134197/#comment-95257</link>
		<dc:creator>fanboi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=134197#comment-95257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Angry birds is free on Android but costs money in the app store.  I&#039;m sure one could argue need to purchase utilities is less with an android phone as well.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angry birds is free on Android but costs money in the app store.  I&#8217;m sure one could argue need to purchase utilities is less with an android phone as well.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
