<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft: We&#8217;ve no own-brand Windows Phone plans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/microsoft-weve-no-own-brand-windows-phone-plans-25235469/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/microsoft-weve-no-own-brand-windows-phone-plans-25235469/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jethro_static</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/microsoft-weve-no-own-brand-windows-phone-plans-25235469/#comment-219371</link>
		<dc:creator>jethro_static</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=235469#comment-219371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[why MS no own windows phone? :( bcoz of kin? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why MS no own windows phone? :( bcoz of kin? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcamdr</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/microsoft-weve-no-own-brand-windows-phone-plans-25235469/#comment-219345</link>
		<dc:creator>jcamdr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=235469#comment-219345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, the word &quot;building&quot; is a bit abusive, but everyone understand the implication of Microsoft selling there own branded products.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the word &#8220;building&#8221; is a bit abusive, but everyone understand the implication of Microsoft selling there own branded products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winski</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/microsoft-weve-no-own-brand-windows-phone-plans-25235469/#comment-219338</link>
		<dc:creator>Winski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=235469#comment-219338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microshaft IS NOT BUILDING the Surface... An Asian sub-contractor is.... So, if you bought into Bomber&#039;s spasmatic pipe dream of over night having a global supply chain to start manufacturing, you&#039;re as delusional as Bomber!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microshaft IS NOT BUILDING the Surface&#8230; An Asian sub-contractor is&#8230;. So, if you bought into Bomber&#8217;s spasmatic pipe dream of over night having a global supply chain to start manufacturing, you&#8217;re as delusional as Bomber!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AmiRami</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/microsoft-weve-no-own-brand-windows-phone-plans-25235469/#comment-219334</link>
		<dc:creator>AmiRami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=235469#comment-219334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i didn&#039;t even know that company still existed! lol]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i didn&#8217;t even know that company still existed! lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack B</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/microsoft-weve-no-own-brand-windows-phone-plans-25235469/#comment-219332</link>
		<dc:creator>jack B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=235469#comment-219332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who believes the big liar?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who believes the big liar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjw149</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/microsoft-weve-no-own-brand-windows-phone-plans-25235469/#comment-219329</link>
		<dc:creator>mjw149</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=235469#comment-219329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Zenith!  That brings back memories.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Zenith!  That brings back memories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Desai</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/microsoft-weve-no-own-brand-windows-phone-plans-25235469/#comment-219327</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Desai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=235469#comment-219327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear MS, you made a mistake trusting OEMs before causing you to lose well pretty much all of the tablet/netbook market to new-comers... yes, MS netbooks/convertible-tablets exists way before iPads/droid-tablets...


Even for phones, you have made a similar decision, for this I will not say anything myself, but rather quote the great Einstein:
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.  



Its okay however, because when Apple/Google/others are over 90% market share and you are &lt; 10%, you will eventually realize this mistake and introduce the Sur[face]phone... Oh wait your presence in mobile is already &lt; 10%... So I assume then that this means you&#039;ve given up hope... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear MS, you made a mistake trusting OEMs before causing you to lose well pretty much all of the tablet/netbook market to new-comers&#8230; yes, MS netbooks/convertible-tablets exists way before iPads/droid-tablets&#8230;</p>
<p>Even for phones, you have made a similar decision, for this I will not say anything myself, but rather quote the great Einstein:<br />
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.  </p>
<p>Its okay however, because when Apple/Google/others are over 90% market share and you are &lt; 10%, you will eventually realize this mistake and introduce the Sur[face]phone&#8230; Oh wait your presence in mobile is already &lt; 10%&#8230; So I assume then that this means you&#039;ve given up hope&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gichu Wil</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/microsoft-weve-no-own-brand-windows-phone-plans-25235469/#comment-219322</link>
		<dc:creator>Gichu Wil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=235469#comment-219322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[love the new discuss sytem. 2nd,microsoft should take caution when going to the tablet business...old fashioned desktop users like myself need to know that we are still valued by MS...manufacturers like dell and acer who are not wholly into tabs will feel left out too...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>love the new discuss sytem. 2nd,microsoft should take caution when going to the tablet business&#8230;old fashioned desktop users like myself need to know that we are still valued by MS&#8230;manufacturers like dell and acer who are not wholly into tabs will feel left out too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcamdr</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/microsoft-weve-no-own-brand-windows-phone-plans-25235469/#comment-219317</link>
		<dc:creator>jcamdr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=235469#comment-219317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still possible in the future: any partners are on a risky business with Microsoft.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still possible in the future: any partners are on a risky business with Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valapsp</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/microsoft-weve-no-own-brand-windows-phone-plans-25235469/#comment-219312</link>
		<dc:creator>valapsp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=235469#comment-219312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was waiting for such clarification. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was waiting for such clarification. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
