<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MacBook Pro early 2011 benchmarks confirm huge performance leap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-early-2011-benchmarks-confirm-huge-performance-leap-25136193/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-early-2011-benchmarks-confirm-huge-performance-leap-25136193/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ColtonCat</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-early-2011-benchmarks-confirm-huge-performance-leap-25136193/#comment-101955</link>
		<dc:creator>ColtonCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136193#comment-101955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 15&quot; has a 2GHz i7 and in the base model in each size - which I believe is the one that is being talked about here and the 17&quot; has a 2.2GHz.

The figures quoted substantiate that if you assume a linear improvement in a CPU benchmark on the same class of CPU as the clock-speed increases.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 15&#8243; has a 2GHz i7 and in the base model in each size &#8211; which I believe is the one that is being talked about here and the 17&#8243; has a 2.2GHz.</p>
<p>The figures quoted substantiate that if you assume a linear improvement in a CPU benchmark on the same class of CPU as the clock-speed increases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JClark</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-early-2011-benchmarks-confirm-huge-performance-leap-25136193/#comment-97498</link>
		<dc:creator>JClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136193#comment-97498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you look at Apple&#039;s spec sheets, both machines have 6mb od cache with the 2.2GHz i7, and 8mb of cache with the 2.3GHz i7. Clearly, that does not account for the difference.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look at Apple&#8217;s spec sheets, both machines have 6mb od cache with the 2.2GHz i7, and 8mb of cache with the 2.3GHz i7. Clearly, that does not account for the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DailyTech</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-early-2011-benchmarks-confirm-huge-performance-leap-25136193/#comment-96970</link>
		<dc:creator>DailyTech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136193#comment-96970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanhs 
http://www.reviewdaily.info/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanhs<br />
<a href="http://www.reviewdaily.info/" rel="nofollow">http://www.reviewdaily.info/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baker1186</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-early-2011-benchmarks-confirm-huge-performance-leap-25136193/#comment-96946</link>
		<dc:creator>Baker1186</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 23:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136193#comment-96946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[6mb of cache vs 8 mb]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6mb of cache vs 8 mb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LG</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-early-2011-benchmarks-confirm-huge-performance-leap-25136193/#comment-96917</link>
		<dc:creator>LG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136193#comment-96917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Different graphics card]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different graphics card</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: totalFlux</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-early-2011-benchmarks-confirm-huge-performance-leap-25136193/#comment-96841</link>
		<dc:creator>totalFlux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 04:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136193#comment-96841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Apple&#039;s website the quad-core models are twice as fast in the CPU area and three times as fast when it comes to graphics thanks to the new ATI graphics chip.  I guess Apple got fed up with Nvidia after a number of their failed graphics chips prompted free repairs out of warranty period for up to 3 years after purchase.  Feel free to read about Thunderbolt and the new MacBook Pro refresh here:  http://totalflux.blogspot.com/2011/02/apple-refreshes-macbook-pro-adds.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Apple&#8217;s website the quad-core models are twice as fast in the CPU area and three times as fast when it comes to graphics thanks to the new ATI graphics chip.  I guess Apple got fed up with Nvidia after a number of their failed graphics chips prompted free repairs out of warranty period for up to 3 years after purchase.  Feel free to read about Thunderbolt and the new MacBook Pro refresh here:  <a href="http://totalflux.blogspot.com/2011/02/apple-refreshes-macbook-pro-adds.html" rel="nofollow">http://totalflux.blogspot.com/2011/02/apple-refreshes-macbook-pro-adds.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edson Dailo</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-early-2011-benchmarks-confirm-huge-performance-leap-25136193/#comment-96809</link>
		<dc:creator>Edson Dailo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136193#comment-96809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LOVE the pro.  Although there is a nitty bitty flaw http://fms.nu/hbfylB , the overall score is amazing!  Apple&#039;s 2011 macbook pro has the best interface]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOVE the pro.  Although there is a nitty bitty flaw <a href="http://fms.nu/hbfylB" rel="nofollow">http://fms.nu/hbfylB</a> , the overall score is amazing!  Apple&#8217;s 2011 macbook pro has the best interface</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ddu</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-early-2011-benchmarks-confirm-huge-performance-leap-25136193/#comment-96794</link>
		<dc:creator>Ddu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136193#comment-96794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How is it possible that the 17inch out performs a 15 inch with the exact same hardware? I smell bullshit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is it possible that the 17inch out performs a 15 inch with the exact same hardware? I smell bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnderDoc</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-early-2011-benchmarks-confirm-huge-performance-leap-25136193/#comment-96788</link>
		<dc:creator>UnderDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136193#comment-96788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore&#039;s_law]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore&#039;s_law" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore&#039;s_law</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnderDoc</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-early-2011-benchmarks-confirm-huge-performance-leap-25136193/#comment-96789</link>
		<dc:creator>UnderDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136193#comment-96789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore&#039;s_law]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore&#039;s_law" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore&#039;s_law</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnderDoc</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-early-2011-benchmarks-confirm-huge-performance-leap-25136193/#comment-96790</link>
		<dc:creator>UnderDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136193#comment-96790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore&#039;s_law]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore&#039;s_law" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore&#039;s_law</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bliss</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-early-2011-benchmarks-confirm-huge-performance-leap-25136193/#comment-96738</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136193#comment-96738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d like to see a bench mark that includes the GPU. Seeing how Nividia usually beats out AMD in most tests.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see a bench mark that includes the GPU. Seeing how Nividia usually beats out AMD in most tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/macbook-pro-early-2011-benchmarks-confirm-huge-performance-leap-25136193/#comment-96718</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136193#comment-96718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Confirmed, new laptop with i7-2720QM CPU performs like new laptop with i7-2720QM CPU.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Confirmed, new laptop with i7-2720QM CPU performs like new laptop with i7-2720QM CPU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
