Comments on: Mac Pro 2010 Review http://www.slashgear.com/mac-pro-2010-review-21103525/ Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions Thu, 17 May 2012 17:46:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Simon http://www.slashgear.com/mac-pro-2010-review-21103525/#comment-68187 Simon Thu, 14 Oct 2010 00:17:53 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=103525#comment-68187 I disagree that the 2.66 GHz 8-core is the best value processor configuration. In another review I’ve seen it called the worst. While it will perform slightly faster than a 3.33 GHz 6-core for highly parallelised software, the vast majority of apps won’t be capable of using all 8 cores efficiently. The 3.33 GHz processor will therefore offer faster everyday performance, by up to 25%, for the majority of apps. If you’re in the market for a mid-range tower you’d want to consider how well your software performs on 8-cores and how much you plan to use that software.

]]> By: amband http://www.slashgear.com/mac-pro-2010-review-21103525/#comment-67051 amband Fri, 24 Sep 2010 04:12:55 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=103525#comment-67051 what the majority of us need, is a review of a stock standard 4 core, what it can and can’t do. You can gauge more from that

thankyou

]]>