<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LTE iPhone 5 in carrier testing according to report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/lte-iphone-5-in-carrier-testing-surfaces-in-carrier-test-build-15171738/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lte-iphone-5-in-carrier-testing-surfaces-in-carrier-test-build-15171738/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 15:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bennett Wethington</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lte-iphone-5-in-carrier-testing-surfaces-in-carrier-test-build-15171738/#comment-130798</link>
		<dc:creator>Bennett Wethington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 05:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=171738#comment-130798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lte chips have come a long way since the thunderbolt was launched. they are much smaller and more efficient, hopefully that is why apple waited. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lte chips have come a long way since the thunderbolt was launched. they are much smaller and more efficient, hopefully that is why apple waited. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lte-iphone-5-in-carrier-testing-surfaces-in-carrier-test-build-15171738/#comment-130786</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 04:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=171738#comment-130786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good choice.  Who wants a phone without the choice of 4G connectivity nowadays.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good choice.  Who wants a phone without the choice of 4G connectivity nowadays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obz(urgirl'sdream)</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lte-iphone-5-in-carrier-testing-surfaces-in-carrier-test-build-15171738/#comment-130714</link>
		<dc:creator>Obz(urgirl'sdream)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 23:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=171738#comment-130714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if the iPhone 5 doesn&#039;t get 4g I will get android FOR SURE!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if the iPhone 5 doesn&#8217;t get 4g I will get android FOR SURE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lily Rice</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lte-iphone-5-in-carrier-testing-surfaces-in-carrier-test-build-15171738/#comment-130611</link>
		<dc:creator>Lily Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=171738#comment-130611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just paìd $22.85 for an ìPad 2-64GB and my girlfriend loves her Panasonic Lumix GF 1 Camera that we got for $38.78 there arriving tomorrow by UPS. I will never pay such expensive retail prices in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LED TV to my boss for $625 which only cost me $62.81 to buy. Here is the website we use to get it all from, &lt;a href=&quot;http://x.co/Z0YR&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ce&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;nt&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;Hu&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;b&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;còm&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just paìd $22.85 for an ìPad 2-64GB and my girlfriend loves her Panasonic Lumix GF 1 Camera that we got for $38.78 there arriving tomorrow by UPS. I will never pay such expensive retail prices in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LED TV to my boss for $625 which only cost me $62.81 to buy. Here is the website we use to get it all from, <a href="http://x.co/Z0YR" rel="nofollow">Ce<em></em>nt<em></em>Hu<em></em>b<em></em>.<em></em>còm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lte-iphone-5-in-carrier-testing-surfaces-in-carrier-test-build-15171738/#comment-130581</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=171738#comment-130581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with 4g at the moment is it&#039;s battery consumtion something apple would not allow to happen on it&#039;s phones in my opinion, they gave up flash for the same reasons ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with 4g at the moment is it&#8217;s battery consumtion something apple would not allow to happen on it&#8217;s phones in my opinion, they gave up flash for the same reasons </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lte-iphone-5-in-carrier-testing-surfaces-in-carrier-test-build-15171738/#comment-130575</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=171738#comment-130575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Assuming the iPhone launches in October (as the consensus seems to be), that would mark a 4 month delay from their normal release window.  I&#039;ve still yet to see a compelling reason/feature why they chose to delay the launch for that long.  A5, not likely.  Slightly bigger screen, easy solution.  Why the delay?  I&#039;m personally holding out hope its 4G.  All the people who say 4G isn&#039;t a big deal are people who haven&#039;t used it.  Its not only a dramatic speed improvement, its drastic.  HSPA+ is largely on par with 3G in most areas, so a HSPA+ iPhone is hardly worth the delay.  I don&#039;t know what it is, but there is obviously a killer feature lurking in the 5, or else Apple would just launch the damn thing and make gobs of money off it.  Could be 4G, I&#039;m hoping it is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assuming the iPhone launches in October (as the consensus seems to be), that would mark a 4 month delay from their normal release window.  I&#8217;ve still yet to see a compelling reason/feature why they chose to delay the launch for that long.  A5, not likely.  Slightly bigger screen, easy solution.  Why the delay?  I&#8217;m personally holding out hope its 4G.  All the people who say 4G isn&#8217;t a big deal are people who haven&#8217;t used it.  Its not only a dramatic speed improvement, its drastic.  HSPA+ is largely on par with 3G in most areas, so a HSPA+ iPhone is hardly worth the delay.  I don&#8217;t know what it is, but there is obviously a killer feature lurking in the 5, or else Apple would just launch the damn thing and make gobs of money off it.  Could be 4G, I&#8217;m hoping it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
