<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LightSquared petitions FCC affirm GPS has no right to protection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 18:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Bryan Britton</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165889</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Bryan Britton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 03:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am an Electrical Engineer with a MS in RF Design and design receivers and filters for a living... so I know it is possible... it might be expensive but it is possible. On the other hand it seems you have problems with notation. Signals are not measured in DB but on dBm. dB is relative whereas dBm is absolute power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an Electrical Engineer with a MS in RF Design and design receivers and filters for a living&#8230; so I know it is possible&#8230; it might be expensive but it is possible. On the other hand it seems you have problems with notation. Signals are not measured in DB but on dBm. dB is relative whereas dBm is absolute power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oups!</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165813</link>
		<dc:creator>Oups!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[21 dec 2021 Breaking News: GPS service stoped in all the USA after LightSquared network was hacked to disturb the GPS signal. Terrorist attack is imminent say the Government..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>21 dec 2021 Breaking News: GPS service stoped in all the USA after LightSquared network was hacked to disturb the GPS signal. Terrorist attack is imminent say the Government..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165771</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Specifically, they paid for spectrum classified for satellite communications use.  They DID NOT pay for spectrum classified for terrestrial use.  IMO if they want to run this service they need to buy appropriate spectrum classified for terrestrial use]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Specifically, they paid for spectrum classified for satellite communications use.  They DID NOT pay for spectrum classified for terrestrial use.  IMO if they want to run this service they need to buy appropriate spectrum classified for terrestrial use</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captchas</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165760</link>
		<dc:creator>captchas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And it follows that FCC cannot impose a requirement on GPS receiver design that isn&#039;t founded in credible science.

Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics has been setting standards for GPS avionics before ancillary base stations were approved by FCC.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it follows that FCC cannot impose a requirement on GPS receiver design that isn&#8217;t founded in credible science.</p>
<p>Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics has been setting standards for GPS avionics before ancillary base stations were approved by FCC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DonShock</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165662</link>
		<dc:creator>DonShock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LightSquared&#039;s own pleading says they worked with the GPS companies in the past to get the waivers for the stronger signals approved by assuring them that the interference would not occur. But now that those stronger signals ARE causing interference, LightSquared says that GPS isn&#039;t entitled to be free from interference.

Just look at the final two diagrams on their own PDF. The show that it&#039;s the LightSquared signal that&#039;s expanding (red bars), via the waiver, into the GPS range of reception (blue line). If LightSquared&#039;s argument were correct that it is the GPS makers fault, the blue GPS line would be within the orange satellite band bars on either end and LightSquared&#039;s own red bars would also be within those same orange bands. Curiously, even though these final two diagrams show the power/frequency limitations of the bands, the discussions in their pleadings only discuss frequency allocations with no apparent limt on the power of the transmissions.

As others have said, it&#039;s only because LightSquared wants to use a waiver to operate outside the limitations of the satellite frequencies that these problems are occurring. Sure, they paid for the spectrum and are entitled to use it. But the waiver isn&#039;t for sale so it should be rescinded since granting it has been shown to cause interference. If they can operate successfully within the originally purchased limitations, have a ball. But if they can&#039;t design THEIR equipment to work within those limits, too bad. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LightSquared&#8217;s own pleading says they worked with the GPS companies in the past to get the waivers for the stronger signals approved by assuring them that the interference would not occur. But now that those stronger signals ARE causing interference, LightSquared says that GPS isn&#8217;t entitled to be free from interference.</p>
<p>Just look at the final two diagrams on their own PDF. The show that it&#8217;s the LightSquared signal that&#8217;s expanding (red bars), via the waiver, into the GPS range of reception (blue line). If LightSquared&#8217;s argument were correct that it is the GPS makers fault, the blue GPS line would be within the orange satellite band bars on either end and LightSquared&#8217;s own red bars would also be within those same orange bands. Curiously, even though these final two diagrams show the power/frequency limitations of the bands, the discussions in their pleadings only discuss frequency allocations with no apparent limt on the power of the transmissions.</p>
<p>As others have said, it&#8217;s only because LightSquared wants to use a waiver to operate outside the limitations of the satellite frequencies that these problems are occurring. Sure, they paid for the spectrum and are entitled to use it. But the waiver isn&#8217;t for sale so it should be rescinded since granting it has been shown to cause interference. If they can operate successfully within the originally purchased limitations, have a ball. But if they can&#8217;t design THEIR equipment to work within those limits, too bad. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165642</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SO, first they bid on and bought frequencies that were reserved for Satellite Communications. They asked to reclassify the frequencies from SatCom to terrestrial use. This reclassification stipulates that no interference with existing SatCom signals can occur in order to be approved.

Seems they took a gamble and lost.

I would bet that even if the FCC caved and approved the reclassification of the frequencies, (ignoring the safety issues with both cars and aircraft) the military would step in and put a stop to it for &quot;national security&quot; reasons. They will not allow a civilian corporation to jeopardize their equipment&#039;s functionality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SO, first they bid on and bought frequencies that were reserved for Satellite Communications. They asked to reclassify the frequencies from SatCom to terrestrial use. This reclassification stipulates that no interference with existing SatCom signals can occur in order to be approved.</p>
<p>Seems they took a gamble and lost.</p>
<p>I would bet that even if the FCC caved and approved the reclassification of the frequencies, (ignoring the safety issues with both cars and aircraft) the military would step in and put a stop to it for &#8220;national security&#8221; reasons. They will not allow a civilian corporation to jeopardize their equipment&#8217;s functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yourcompanynamegoeshere</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165620</link>
		<dc:creator>yourcompanynamegoeshere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 04:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to think, should ever a Light Squared executive or attorney be guided by a malfunctioning GPS across a river where there is no bridge, or in flight through a mountain pass where there is actually a mountain, will, for just one last fleeting moment, understand that making choices have consequences, and not always the consequence you want or think you deserve. Oh well, probably not; it is all about greed and blame it on the other guy and a total a lack of conscience..... It&#039;s the dance of the &quot;devil&quot; some would say....

But hey! 
Every one of you reading this I bet has the computer skills necessary to search-out the address and email your local Member of Congress! Just keep it simple and to the point. This topic has nothing to do with political postures, it&#039;s about who runs this country. You? Or the Light Squared executives and attorneys? 

And hey! You can take action while still sitting on your butt!  What a Great Country....!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to think, should ever a Light Squared executive or attorney be guided by a malfunctioning GPS across a river where there is no bridge, or in flight through a mountain pass where there is actually a mountain, will, for just one last fleeting moment, understand that making choices have consequences, and not always the consequence you want or think you deserve. Oh well, probably not; it is all about greed and blame it on the other guy and a total a lack of conscience&#8230;.. It&#8217;s the dance of the &#8220;devil&#8221; some would say&#8230;.</p>
<p>But hey!<br />
Every one of you reading this I bet has the computer skills necessary to search-out the address and email your local Member of Congress! Just keep it simple and to the point. This topic has nothing to do with political postures, it&#8217;s about who runs this country. You? Or the Light Squared executives and attorneys? </p>
<p>And hey! You can take action while still sitting on your butt!  What a Great Country&#8230;.!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165615</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 03:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dude, the spectrum is reserved for satcom... lightsquared is trying to reclassify it for terrestrial use, which involves broadcasting signals FIVE BILLION times stronger than the spectrum is reserved for]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, the spectrum is reserved for satcom&#8230; lightsquared is trying to reclassify it for terrestrial use, which involves broadcasting signals FIVE BILLION times stronger than the spectrum is reserved for</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165614</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 03:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you aren&#039;t an electrical engineer you should stop posting.  There is no filter that can filter out a 30 DB signal in an adjacent band when trying to receive a 130 DB signal.  It&#039;s simple physics and no one with half a brain would suggest it&#039;s possible.  This is why the spectrum is reserved for satcom in the first place]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you aren&#8217;t an electrical engineer you should stop posting.  There is no filter that can filter out a 30 DB signal in an adjacent band when trying to receive a 130 DB signal.  It&#8217;s simple physics and no one with half a brain would suggest it&#8217;s possible.  This is why the spectrum is reserved for satcom in the first place</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165613</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 03:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NO NO NO NO NO.  First of all the only party &quot;using spectrum&quot; for GPS is the United States Air Force... who operate the satellites that transmit the signal.  Lightsquared is attempting to reclassify spectrum reserved for satellite communications and instead broadcast terrestrial signals that are around 5 billion (note a typo) times stronger.  They need a waiver from the FCC which they aren&#039;t going to get]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO NO NO NO NO.  First of all the only party &#8220;using spectrum&#8221; for GPS is the United States Air Force&#8230; who operate the satellites that transmit the signal.  Lightsquared is attempting to reclassify spectrum reserved for satellite communications and instead broadcast terrestrial signals that are around 5 billion (note a typo) times stronger.  They need a waiver from the FCC which they aren&#8217;t going to get</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165612</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 03:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suspect that &quot;simple filter&quot; will cost hundreds of dollars, if it can even be built. B]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that &#8220;simple filter&#8221; will cost hundreds of dollars, if it can even be built. B</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165611</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 03:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think about having your neighbor decide to turn on a claxon every day.  Oh, it&#039;s his right.  Just close your window.  The problem is that light squared frequencies were supposed to be for satellite, at tiny power on earth.  Now they want to run KW level signals.  Will swamp out anything nearby.  This is not mis-design; it&#039;s misuse of public spectrum.  (Shocker: spectrum belongs to the public, not some bank or corporation.).  The public, through the FCC can tell light-squared to get stuffed, and that&#039;s just what they ought to do.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think about having your neighbor decide to turn on a claxon every day.  Oh, it&#8217;s his right.  Just close your window.  The problem is that light squared frequencies were supposed to be for satellite, at tiny power on earth.  Now they want to run KW level signals.  Will swamp out anything nearby.  This is not mis-design; it&#8217;s misuse of public spectrum.  (Shocker: spectrum belongs to the public, not some bank or corporation.).  The public, through the FCC can tell light-squared to get stuffed, and that&#8217;s just what they ought to do.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165610</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 03:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it all depends on how many congressmen they can buy.  My guess is a lot.  Better get used to no GPS.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it all depends on how many congressmen they can buy.  My guess is a lot.  Better get used to no GPS.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Bryan Britton</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165608</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Bryan Britton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 03:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trying to be neutral here, the FCC is in place for some reason. They have rules on how much power a transmitter can &quot;leak&quot; in to another frequency and usually they don&#039;t really care what the receiver does as long as it doesn&#039;t radiate more than their limit. If LightSquared is complying with these rules I don&#039;t see why they should be denied the spectrum they purchased. Anyhow, changing the GPS module (with a proper filter) of a GPS system is not too expensive if we are talking of an airplane&#039;s GPS... and most people change their GPS enabled phones/ car phones every 2-3 years. Creating the Light^2 network will probably take longer than this. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying to be neutral here, the FCC is in place for some reason. They have rules on how much power a transmitter can &#8220;leak&#8221; in to another frequency and usually they don&#8217;t really care what the receiver does as long as it doesn&#8217;t radiate more than their limit. If LightSquared is complying with these rules I don&#8217;t see why they should be denied the spectrum they purchased. Anyhow, changing the GPS module (with a proper filter) of a GPS system is not too expensive if we are talking of an airplane&#8217;s GPS&#8230; and most people change their GPS enabled phones/ car phones every 2-3 years. Creating the Light^2 network will probably take longer than this. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimlux</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165607</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimlux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 03:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And if LightSquared didn&#039;t need a waiver to the existing permission (to radiate low powers from orbit) the GPS receivers wouldn&#039;t have a problem.  Bands are allocated with the knowledge that &quot;brickwall&quot; filters don&#039;t exist. Low power next to low power, high power next to high power. Light squared wants to put multi kilowatt transmitters on the ground, as opposed to 100W transmitters in GEO.  
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if LightSquared didn&#8217;t need a waiver to the existing permission (to radiate low powers from orbit) the GPS receivers wouldn&#8217;t have a problem.  Bands are allocated with the knowledge that &#8220;brickwall&#8221; filters don&#8217;t exist. Low power next to low power, high power next to high power. Light squared wants to put multi kilowatt transmitters on the ground, as opposed to 100W transmitters in GEO. <br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Bryan Britton</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165606</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Bryan Britton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 03:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is not that GPS is using LightSquared&#039;s spectrum, is that the GPS manufacturers have done a poor job in designing the filters that block LightSquared&#039;s spectrum hence it allows the interference... at least this is what Light^2 is claiming... if this is correct then the FCC should grant them permission to proceed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not that GPS is using LightSquared&#8217;s spectrum, is that the GPS manufacturers have done a poor job in designing the filters that block LightSquared&#8217;s spectrum hence it allows the interference&#8230; at least this is what Light^2 is claiming&#8230; if this is correct then the FCC should grant them permission to proceed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frediano</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165605</link>
		<dc:creator>Frediano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 02:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They are so going to lose this one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are so going to lose this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard W</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165604</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 02:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[itsmemom -- if what they are saying is correct then the aviation GPS system is at fault for using spectrum that it&#039;s not licensed for. It&#039;s therefore the GPS that is a fault here, however Lightsquared is having to pay the price -- in delays and in real cost since it purchased the spectrum that its now being denied access too because GPS manufacturers were sloppy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>itsmemom &#8212; if what they are saying is correct then the aviation GPS system is at fault for using spectrum that it&#8217;s not licensed for. It&#8217;s therefore the GPS that is a fault here, however Lightsquared is having to pay the price &#8212; in delays and in real cost since it purchased the spectrum that its now being denied access too because GPS manufacturers were sloppy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165602</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 02:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually Lightsquared is in the wrong.  They purchased this spectrum knowing full well that it was reserved for satellite communications... they applied to reclassify it on the condition it would not interfere with GPS.. too bad, so sad.

In any case they have zero chance of getting their stuff through.  You think politicians are going to back them over the UNITED STATES AIR FORCE?  LMFAO]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Lightsquared is in the wrong.  They purchased this spectrum knowing full well that it was reserved for satellite communications&#8230; they applied to reclassify it on the condition it would not interfere with GPS.. too bad, so sad.</p>
<p>In any case they have zero chance of getting their stuff through.  You think politicians are going to back them over the UNITED STATES AIR FORCE?  LMFAO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165601</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WRONG... do more reading on how weak satellite signals are.... that&#039;s why this band was RESERVED for satellite communication.  LightSquared applied to re-classify this spectrum on the condition it would NOT interfere with GPS.. .too bad so sad]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WRONG&#8230; do more reading on how weak satellite signals are&#8230;. that&#8217;s why this band was RESERVED for satellite communication.  LightSquared applied to re-classify this spectrum on the condition it would NOT interfere with GPS.. .too bad so sad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itsmemom</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165600</link>
		<dc:creator>itsmemom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The root cause of this debate isn&#039;t so much affecting &quot;just&quot; GPS&#039;s.  It&#039;s because It affect aviation GPS recievers.  I work in aviation on these systems.  What was once a nice feature has become a safety navigation device in the aircraft.  So much in the cockpit now rely&#039;s on the GPS functioning properly to make sure you make it to your parents house for the holidays.  I&#039;ve seen the FAA reports on this and light square doesn&#039;t just &quot;interfere&quot; with the signal.....it completely blanks it out... making navigation impossible via gps.  So before ppl start complaining &quot;I want my 4G&quot;... remember that many thousands of aircraft rely on a safety system that could be hampered just because you wanna keep up with the kardashians quicker.  What they don&#039;t say in this debate is that there were two other companies that saw this and bid a different 4G band... but because light squared was the cheapest it won... not necessarily the best... not they are trying to hold on to the contract.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The root cause of this debate isn&#8217;t so much affecting &#8220;just&#8221; GPS&#8217;s.  It&#8217;s because It affect aviation GPS recievers.  I work in aviation on these systems.  What was once a nice feature has become a safety navigation device in the aircraft.  So much in the cockpit now rely&#8217;s on the GPS functioning properly to make sure you make it to your parents house for the holidays.  I&#8217;ve seen the FAA reports on this and light square doesn&#8217;t just &#8220;interfere&#8221; with the signal&#8230;..it completely blanks it out&#8230; making navigation impossible via gps.  So before ppl start complaining &#8220;I want my 4G&#8221;&#8230; remember that many thousands of aircraft rely on a safety system that could be hampered just because you wanna keep up with the kardashians quicker.  What they don&#8217;t say in this debate is that there were two other companies that saw this and bid a different 4G band&#8230; but because light squared was the cheapest it won&#8230; not necessarily the best&#8230; not they are trying to hold on to the contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Concerned engineer</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165597</link>
		<dc:creator>Concerned engineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, a &quot;simple filter&quot; will NOT solve the problem!  

First of all the cost will be in the BILLIONS since GPS users would have to REPLACE their existing user equipment with newer sets since the existing receivers are fully crammed with circuitry and there is no room to retrofit this &quot;simple filter&quot;...and the labor cost would be prohibitive.

Second, the GPS signals from the satellites 12,000 MILES away are very weak and GPS receivers use a lot of sophisticated signal processing to dig the satellite signals out of the existing radio noise!  Adding Lightsquared&#039;s local transmitters would swamp the receivers and prevent this.

GPS is a primary navigation aid for the Military, Airlines, and General aviation - how many people would Lightsquared like to kill by interfering with precision navigation systems?

And finally a question:  Has anyone looked into the question of whether or not Lightsquared is a pawn of an unfriendly foreign power / nation / organization / terrorist group seeking to wreck havoc in the US and the International community?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, a &#8220;simple filter&#8221; will NOT solve the problem!  </p>
<p>First of all the cost will be in the BILLIONS since GPS users would have to REPLACE their existing user equipment with newer sets since the existing receivers are fully crammed with circuitry and there is no room to retrofit this &#8220;simple filter&#8221;&#8230;and the labor cost would be prohibitive.</p>
<p>Second, the GPS signals from the satellites 12,000 MILES away are very weak and GPS receivers use a lot of sophisticated signal processing to dig the satellite signals out of the existing radio noise!  Adding Lightsquared&#8217;s local transmitters would swamp the receivers and prevent this.</p>
<p>GPS is a primary navigation aid for the Military, Airlines, and General aviation &#8211; how many people would Lightsquared like to kill by interfering with precision navigation systems?</p>
<p>And finally a question:  Has anyone looked into the question of whether or not Lightsquared is a pawn of an unfriendly foreign power / nation / organization / terrorist group seeking to wreck havoc in the US and the International community?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olcbyh</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165596</link>
		<dc:creator>Olcbyh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 02:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;punk GPS jockeys&quot;...

Chris, you are a dope.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;punk GPS jockeys&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Chris, you are a dope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earthorbiter</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165595</link>
		<dc:creator>Earthorbiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 02:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Freq&#039;s sit next to the GPS freq&#039;s. They are not harmonic related. If a good reciever is built adjacent interference is nulled with a good front end filter design. The GPS recievers used on the consumer market can vary in quality depending on how much the cost of the circuit is lowered. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Freq&#8217;s sit next to the GPS freq&#8217;s. They are not harmonic related. If a good reciever is built adjacent interference is nulled with a good front end filter design. The GPS recievers used on the consumer market can vary in quality depending on how much the cost of the circuit is lowered. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dracenduria</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165592</link>
		<dc:creator>Dracenduria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lightsquared has done nothing wrong, this is all the fault of lax regulations on GPS manufacturers, a simple filter will solve this issue. But that cost money, something that the GPS manufacturers will not do. If the FCC does its job to uphold order in the airwaves, Lightsquared will get to keep the rights to the spectrum they own.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lightsquared has done nothing wrong, this is all the fault of lax regulations on GPS manufacturers, a simple filter will solve this issue. But that cost money, something that the GPS manufacturers will not do. If the FCC does its job to uphold order in the airwaves, Lightsquared will get to keep the rights to the spectrum they own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrivateGreeddoesItagain</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/lightsquared-petitions-fcc-affirm-gps-has-no-right-to-protection-20203660/#comment-165589</link>
		<dc:creator>PrivateGreeddoesItagain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=203660#comment-165589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great, private industry will interfere with GPS Standard frequencies that have been in place for years (and is in fact licensed to the US Military as primary user) .

I see this as a health &amp; safety issue when it come to interfereing with standard, known, GPS frequencies. Down come our GPS used in Aviation, Security and Public Safety, as well as introducing safety issues to millions of users around the world.  Thanks Lightsquared... why didn&#039;t your engineers realize the spectrum you bought COULD have interfered with GPS units all over the world and vica-versa. Yell at the FCC all you want, but you should have known this before you bid on that slice of spectrum.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, private industry will interfere with GPS Standard frequencies that have been in place for years (and is in fact licensed to the US Military as primary user) .</p>
<p>I see this as a health &amp; safety issue when it come to interfereing with standard, known, GPS frequencies. Down come our GPS used in Aviation, Security and Public Safety, as well as introducing safety issues to millions of users around the world.  Thanks Lightsquared&#8230; why didn&#8217;t your engineers realize the spectrum you bought COULD have interfered with GPS units all over the world and vica-versa. Yell at the FCC all you want, but you should have known this before you bid on that slice of spectrum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
