Comments on: LHC may have observed Higgs boson for the first time

By: bkb

bkb — Wed, 14 Dec 2011 04:58:00 +0000

99.9% is a good start, and that is 3.0 sigma.

By: Jeremiah Dyess

Jeremiah Dyess — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:18:00 +0000

Nature always has surprises for us. I think we are just scratching the tip of the iceberg.

By: Johnnie

Johnnie — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:58:00 +0000

Hey there! 3.5 sigma is not considered a valid discovery yet…. chill out and wait please.

By: Poweroftime

Poweroftime — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:08:00 +0000

What if there are two higgs? 1 for normal matter and second for exotic matter like neutrinoes, dark matter, dark energy and tackeons?

By: Kevin West

Kevin West — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:04:00 +0000

Physics is as much as about exploring the unknown in our universe as it is about observing the known. Keep an open mind.

By: P Butler

P Butler — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:48:00 +0000

Perhaps they exist in separate universes both of which are observible if you stand on a step stool…

By: Anadish Pal

Anadish Pal — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:26:00 +0000

Faster than light Neutrinoes and Higgs both cannot coexist — either one has to be wrong. It’s DCE research and superluminal speed which has the potential of breaking current scientific barriers, rather than finding a nebulous statistical dual peak for a Higgs, which well could be due to many other anomalies, one that LHC could not decipher is that of the UFOs.