Comments on: Lenovo X200 Tablet Review http://www.slashgear.com/lenovo-x200-tablet-review-3062260/ Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions Thu, 17 May 2012 17:46:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Ewdison Then http://www.slashgear.com/lenovo-x200-tablet-review-3062260/#comment-60870 Ewdison Then Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:51:57 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=62260#comment-60870 Thanks for the input, for future reference we will ask manufacturer to send us standard config. Sometimes we just don’t have the luxury to request those beforehand.

]]> By: Facebook User http://www.slashgear.com/lenovo-x200-tablet-review-3062260/#comment-60869 Facebook User Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:10:40 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=62260#comment-60869 It doesn’t make sense to review a device with a configuration that isn’t even available for purchase…

SlashGear should have required a standard configuration … otherwise who knows what else Lenovo modified to create a more positive view of the product itself.

]]> By: Facebook User http://www.slashgear.com/lenovo-x200-tablet-review-3062260/#comment-60868 Facebook User Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:08:32 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=62260#comment-60868 Where did you get a 2.13GHz Core 2 Duo L9600 processor model? That is not an available configuration from Lenovo for the X200 Tablet…

]]> By: low123456 http://www.slashgear.com/lenovo-x200-tablet-review-3062260/#comment-60797 low123456 Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:14:49 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=62260#comment-60797 Interessante, A tecnologia está bem avançada. 10 anos atrás era diferente.

]]> By: Jeremie Tisseau http://www.slashgear.com/lenovo-x200-tablet-review-3062260/#comment-60468 Jeremie Tisseau Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:25:44 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=62260#comment-60468 This tablet is probably one of the most ugly piece of hardware around. Are we back to the 90s?

]]>