<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leaked Intel roadmap outs Valley View chip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/leaked-intel-roadmap-outs-valley-view-chip-23219753/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/leaked-intel-roadmap-outs-valley-view-chip-23219753/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyberGusa</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/leaked-intel-roadmap-outs-valley-view-chip-23219753/#comment-196504</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberGusa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 09:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=219753#comment-196504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New?

Look at the color coding... It puts Sandy Bridge as under still being developed and Cedar Trail as in planning stages.

While still showing 2010... It&#039;s obviously an old slide.  Though Intel is definitely considering creating a version of the HD 4000 for the ATOM line.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New?</p>
<p>Look at the color coding&#8230; It puts Sandy Bridge as under still being developed and Cedar Trail as in planning stages.</p>
<p>While still showing 2010&#8230; It&#8217;s obviously an old slide.  Though Intel is definitely considering creating a version of the HD 4000 for the ATOM line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
