http://www.slashgear.com/kinect-specs-reveal-only-two-active-players-supported-3092252/ Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:57:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://www.slashgear.com/kinect-specs-reveal-only-two-active-players-supported-3092252/#comment-64644 Peabods Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:48:19 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=92252#comment-64644 If your reply was in the original post i wouldn’t have said anything about it. Your original blanket statement on its own needed a little explanation as to your thinking. I appreciate the reply none the less.

]]> http://www.slashgear.com/kinect-specs-reveal-only-two-active-players-supported-3092252/#comment-64640 Chris Davies Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:46:40 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=92252#comment-64640 VGA quality cameras with relatively low field of view angles and a 16-bit microphone? Is it so unusual to think they’re low-spec components? I mean, it’s great for Microsoft since they’re affordable too, and I’m not saying that they *need* to be high-end for it to be worth the money. If anything, I’m impressed Kinect can do what it does with such relatively low resolution optics.

]]> http://www.slashgear.com/kinect-specs-reveal-only-two-active-players-supported-3092252/#comment-64638 Peabods Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:36:07 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=92252#comment-64638 “and the most interesting element is just how low-end the hardware actually is”
You’re kidding right, and your basis for making this claim is what, do you design hardware??? Stupid comments like this are just that…stupid. I stopped reading after that comment, good job.

]]>