<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jury says Google doesn&#8217;t infringe on Oracle patents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/jury-says-google-doesnt-infringe-on-oracle-patents-23229548/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/jury-says-google-doesnt-infringe-on-oracle-patents-23229548/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorin Sori</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/jury-says-google-doesnt-infringe-on-oracle-patents-23229548/#comment-213239</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorin Sori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=229548#comment-213239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://lazycash23
http://lazycash23 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lazycash23" rel="nofollow">http://lazycash23</a><br />
<a href="http://lazycash23" rel="nofollow">http://lazycash23</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oblong of Orange</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/jury-says-google-doesnt-infringe-on-oracle-patents-23229548/#comment-212997</link>
		<dc:creator>Oblong of Orange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=229548#comment-212997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Oracle wanted to kill Java development, then a win would have done it. Not that I like Java, bloaty pile of crap. Although it does have its positives, I guess.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Oracle wanted to kill Java development, then a win would have done it. Not that I like Java, bloaty pile of crap. Although it does have its positives, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Droidfan</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/jury-says-google-doesnt-infringe-on-oracle-patents-23229548/#comment-212894</link>
		<dc:creator>Droidfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 02:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=229548#comment-212894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Next stop....Apple and Microsoft........]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next stop&#8230;.Apple and Microsoft&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liaw Kim Poh</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/jury-says-google-doesnt-infringe-on-oracle-patents-23229548/#comment-212870</link>
		<dc:creator>Liaw Kim Poh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=229548#comment-212870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[congratulation to Google!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>congratulation to Google!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faizalla</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/jury-says-google-doesnt-infringe-on-oracle-patents-23229548/#comment-212850</link>
		<dc:creator>Faizalla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=229548#comment-212850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ for Oracle..
find more lame patents to troll]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> for Oracle..<br />
find more lame patents to troll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/jury-says-google-doesnt-infringe-on-oracle-patents-23229548/#comment-212849</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=229548#comment-212849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[so what&#039;s next?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so what&#8217;s next?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrewlh</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/jury-says-google-doesnt-infringe-on-oracle-patents-23229548/#comment-212844</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrewlh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=229548#comment-212844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[according to the judge, the references were neither symbolic, nor numeric... whatever that means]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>according to the judge, the references were neither symbolic, nor numeric&#8230; whatever that means</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n900mixalot</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/jury-says-google-doesnt-infringe-on-oracle-patents-23229548/#comment-212820</link>
		<dc:creator>n900mixalot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=229548#comment-212820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed. Oracle&#039;s attorneys were probably not very clear about their side of the story. Also, jurors may have sensed favoritism and felt bad for Google. They are usually instructed to make decisions based solely on the evidence presented, but as humans, turning off their personal feelings is often times impossible. Even if they felt like the judge was beating on Google, they may change their minds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. Oracle&#8217;s attorneys were probably not very clear about their side of the story. Also, jurors may have sensed favoritism and felt bad for Google. They are usually instructed to make decisions based solely on the evidence presented, but as humans, turning off their personal feelings is often times impossible. Even if they felt like the judge was beating on Google, they may change their minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n900mixalot</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/jury-says-google-doesnt-infringe-on-oracle-patents-23229548/#comment-212819</link>
		<dc:creator>n900mixalot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=229548#comment-212819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you cant convince a panel of foolish luddites, you arent an attorney worth her own weight in salt. Good attorneys, through evidence and experts, should be able to present a clean, clear case.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you cant convince a panel of foolish luddites, you arent an attorney worth her own weight in salt. Good attorneys, through evidence and experts, should be able to present a clean, clear case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me987654</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/jury-says-google-doesnt-infringe-on-oracle-patents-23229548/#comment-212817</link>
		<dc:creator>me987654</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=229548#comment-212817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It wasn&#039;t a hard decision.  The patent didn&#039;t apply, so the fact that it was a junk patent wasn&#039;t even relevant.  The patent only covered symbolic references, not numeric like Dalvik uses.  In fact the patent no only doesn&#039;t cover Dalvik, it DOESN&#039;T EVEN COVER JAVA!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t a hard decision.  The patent didn&#8217;t apply, so the fact that it was a junk patent wasn&#8217;t even relevant.  The patent only covered symbolic references, not numeric like Dalvik uses.  In fact the patent no only doesn&#8217;t cover Dalvik, it DOESN&#8217;T EVEN COVER JAVA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: subsilentio</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/jury-says-google-doesnt-infringe-on-oracle-patents-23229548/#comment-212796</link>
		<dc:creator>subsilentio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=229548#comment-212796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good.  While juries often get a lot of flack, apparently this jury could see through Oracle&#039;s bullshit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good.  While juries often get a lot of flack, apparently this jury could see through Oracle&#8217;s bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/jury-says-google-doesnt-infringe-on-oracle-patents-23229548/#comment-212795</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=229548#comment-212795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The decision was definitely made by a bunch of foolish luddites, albeit the right decision. At the end of the day, derailing Android is a job-killer, and that won&#039;t fly with anyone at the moment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The decision was definitely made by a bunch of foolish luddites, albeit the right decision. At the end of the day, derailing Android is a job-killer, and that won&#8217;t fly with anyone at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xyberviri</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/jury-says-google-doesnt-infringe-on-oracle-patents-23229548/#comment-212793</link>
		<dc:creator>xyberviri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=229548#comment-212793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was it because people on the jury understood the technology? or was it because they had no clue what the trial was about to begin with?

I&#039;m not going to argue about the verdict but I’m still curious as to how the jury reached the verdict.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was it because people on the jury understood the technology? or was it because they had no clue what the trial was about to begin with?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to argue about the verdict but I’m still curious as to how the jury reached the verdict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Bonkoski</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/jury-says-google-doesnt-infringe-on-oracle-patents-23229548/#comment-212790</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bonkoski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=229548#comment-212790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yaaay!  This is awesome, finally some common sense]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yaaay!  This is awesome, finally some common sense</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Good ol' JS</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/jury-says-google-doesnt-infringe-on-oracle-patents-23229548/#comment-212781</link>
		<dc:creator>Good ol' JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=229548#comment-212781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I personally was hoping for this outcome and the way the tech press made it out, anything other than this would have started the crumble of society.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally was hoping for this outcome and the way the tech press made it out, anything other than this would have started the crumble of society.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
