Comments on: Ivy Bridge chipset detailed: native USB 3.0 and faster PCIe http://www.slashgear.com/ivy-bridge-chipset-detailed-native-usb-3-0-and-faster-pcie-09222090/ Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:49:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: i hate fuck you http://www.slashgear.com/ivy-bridge-chipset-detailed-native-usb-3-0-and-faster-pcie-09222090/#comment-263824 i hate fuck you Mon, 31 Dec 2012 04:13:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222090#comment-263824 Exactly what was the point of that comment?

]]> By: fuck you http://www.slashgear.com/ivy-bridge-chipset-detailed-native-usb-3-0-and-faster-pcie-09222090/#comment-217514 fuck you Mon, 18 Jun 2012 19:44:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222090#comment-217514 fuck you and fuck MAC, its about intel so get the fuck outta here asshole!!

]]> By: Ben Kersey http://www.slashgear.com/ivy-bridge-chipset-detailed-native-usb-3-0-and-faster-pcie-09222090/#comment-201075 Ben Kersey Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:48:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222090#comment-201075 Fixed!

]]> By: Dan Persa http://www.slashgear.com/ivy-bridge-chipset-detailed-native-usb-3-0-and-faster-pcie-09222090/#comment-201052 Dan Persa Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:02:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222090#comment-201052 “That’s 95W less than the peak achieved with Sandy Bridge processors like the 2600K”
that’s not correct… it’s down from 95W to 77W… so 18W less…

It would have been great a 95W decrease of power…

]]> By: Idon't Know http://www.slashgear.com/ivy-bridge-chipset-detailed-native-usb-3-0-and-faster-pcie-09222090/#comment-201039 Idon't Know Mon, 09 Apr 2012 14:35:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222090#comment-201039 Now Macs will have USB 3.0 finally.

]]>