<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPod Nano Touch concept gets skinny</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/ipod-nano-touch-concept-gets-skinny-02221084/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ipod-nano-touch-concept-gets-skinny-02221084/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 02:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarlosMarred</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ipod-nano-touch-concept-gets-skinny-02221084/#comment-204123</link>
		<dc:creator>CarlosMarred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=221084#comment-204123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When is it coming out I&#039;m going to get it just like I got the PZ Vir]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is it coming out I&#8217;m going to get it just like I got the PZ Vir</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New_man84</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ipod-nano-touch-concept-gets-skinny-02221084/#comment-199332</link>
		<dc:creator>New_man84</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 02:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=221084#comment-199332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest shuffle is still the best ipod Apple has ever designed. Fulfills the requirements of audio playback perfectly while everything superfluous has been stripped out, giving great battery life and price. Proper, focussed design that knows what it should be. This thing, on the other hand, is a confused mess of half-features that would fail to do anything you want it to do well. Terrible design, and ugly as sin too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest shuffle is still the best ipod Apple has ever designed. Fulfills the requirements of audio playback perfectly while everything superfluous has been stripped out, giving great battery life and price. Proper, focussed design that knows what it should be. This thing, on the other hand, is a confused mess of half-features that would fail to do anything you want it to do well. Terrible design, and ugly as sin too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grendell</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ipod-nano-touch-concept-gets-skinny-02221084/#comment-199303</link>
		<dc:creator>Grendell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 00:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=221084#comment-199303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Siri should also be an auto include!
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Siri should also be an auto include!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grendell</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ipod-nano-touch-concept-gets-skinny-02221084/#comment-199302</link>
		<dc:creator>Grendell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 00:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=221084#comment-199302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cool! maybe trade in full screen video for basic telephony, messaging and a few socials and feeds. I phone nano, anyone?
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool! maybe trade in full screen video for basic telephony, messaging and a few socials and feeds. I phone nano, anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roybertito2</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ipod-nano-touch-concept-gets-skinny-02221084/#comment-199285</link>
		<dc:creator>roybertito2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 23:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=221084#comment-199285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cool, but never going to happen. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, but never going to happen. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whereisseth</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ipod-nano-touch-concept-gets-skinny-02221084/#comment-199209</link>
		<dc:creator>Whereisseth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=221084#comment-199209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I miss the 3rd gen Nano !!!
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I miss the 3rd gen Nano !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Mac Eoin</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ipod-nano-touch-concept-gets-skinny-02221084/#comment-199188</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mac Eoin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=221084#comment-199188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;ll never happen. This concept is basically an iPod Touch cut in half. It&#039;s too big for what the nano is intended for (strapping to arms for running, small pocket etc). It&#039;s not meant to have a crazy amount of features. That&#039;s what the Touch is for.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll never happen. This concept is basically an iPod Touch cut in half. It&#8217;s too big for what the nano is intended for (strapping to arms for running, small pocket etc). It&#8217;s not meant to have a crazy amount of features. That&#8217;s what the Touch is for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpaceCaptainWarlock</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ipod-nano-touch-concept-gets-skinny-02221084/#comment-199179</link>
		<dc:creator>SpaceCaptainWarlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=221084#comment-199179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ha, that&#039;s just silly.  It&#039;s too big for a &quot;nano&quot; and too feature rich to hit the necessary price point for nano customers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, that&#8217;s just silly.  It&#8217;s too big for a &#8220;nano&#8221; and too feature rich to hit the necessary price point for nano customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobb_O</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ipod-nano-touch-concept-gets-skinny-02221084/#comment-199178</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobb_O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=221084#comment-199178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No way. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlitos</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ipod-nano-touch-concept-gets-skinny-02221084/#comment-199172</link>
		<dc:creator>charlitos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=221084#comment-199172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lol cute but NO]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol cute but NO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
