<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone alarm fault allows unexpected lie-in</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/iphone-alarm-fault-allows-unexpected-lie-in-01111437/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/iphone-alarm-fault-allows-unexpected-lie-in-01111437/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/iphone-alarm-fault-allows-unexpected-lie-in-01111437/#comment-70398</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=111437#comment-70398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slashgear should check with their Australian/NZ affiliates, this is old news. Apple have confirmed the issue to Australian media in the past, and promised that a fix is &quot;Coming soon&quot;, however, that&#039;s the last I&#039;ve heard... (I use a clock radio, not my iPhone, so I don&#039;t really care so much.)

Still, this points to a failure in QA, this is not an unusual condition nor unprecedented and can be checked but automated software tests very easily.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slashgear should check with their Australian/NZ affiliates, this is old news. Apple have confirmed the issue to Australian media in the past, and promised that a fix is &#8220;Coming soon&#8221;, however, that&#8217;s the last I&#8217;ve heard&#8230; (I use a clock radio, not my iPhone, so I don&#8217;t really care so much.)</p>
<p>Still, this points to a failure in QA, this is not an unusual condition nor unprecedented and can be checked but automated software tests very easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/iphone-alarm-fault-allows-unexpected-lie-in-01111437/#comment-70387</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 10:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=111437#comment-70387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ahh, that makes sense then, otherwise it would be a hugely overlooked error on the part of Apple]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, that makes sense then, otherwise it would be a hugely overlooked error on the part of Apple</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apmeh</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/iphone-alarm-fault-allows-unexpected-lie-in-01111437/#comment-70386</link>
		<dc:creator>Apmeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 10:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=111437#comment-70386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the problem exists only if you chose &quot;set automatically&quot; time option. if you put time yourself, the problem vanishes]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the problem exists only if you chose &#8220;set automatically&#8221; time option. if you put time yourself, the problem vanishes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
