Comments on: iPhone 4 Review

By: Meir123

Meir123 — Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:53:00 +0000

fantastic

By: Meir123

Meir123 — Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:53:00 +0000

fantastic

By: מחשבים

מחשבים — Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:38:42 +0000

Your blog info quality is pretty good. Thanks.

By: צריכת דלק

צריכת דלק — Mon, 03 Jan 2011 09:46:35 +0000

I must say it’s the opposite. I’ve been to USA and it seems like a third world country to me in so many things. I’ve lived in Germany, Sweden, Spain, Portugal France and Switzerland. Except Portugal I would rank USA as less developed than any of the others.

By: אייפון

אייפון — Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:50:17 +0000

nice review.

By: freeman

freeman — Fri, 19 Nov 2010 20:30:57 +0000

nice review and another iphone 4 review at http:/apple-shuttle.blogspot.com
apple imania

By: Syed Kamran

Syed Kamran — Sun, 14 Nov 2010 17:08:08 +0000

Apple iPhone 4 makes the most awaited video calling a reality with its face time feature. And the Retina display gives the highest resolution display ever. And to keep that display for long blueunplugged introduces you to the amazing Apple iPhone 4 accessories at the unbeatable prices. So cease all you need for your iPhone 4 and keep it in its best working condition for years to come…… Latest From The Mobile Fanatics.http://ridakami.blogspot.com/……http://ridakami.blogspot.com/

By: אפליקציות לאייפון

אפליקציות לאייפון — Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:20:57 +0000

Galaxy S is separately regulated within browser. Verry unprofesional.
Are you sponsored by iRetina crew?!?!

By: Bryan

Bryan — Wed, 03 Nov 2010 20:07:24 +0000

besides retina display! Gyroscope! led flash! smoother more fluid touch! easy 2 use ui! Ability to recognize 10 fingers +1! crisp audio quality! 3rd party apps dat support flash! wat remains!
now b4 u lash out! i wud rather get d galaxy s! But i ask u 2 judge fairly! ders no amount of brightness tweaking dat will make d galaxy s look better in terms of display! unlike myself! majority of ppl just want a shinny new toy easy 2use. i knw a couple o peeps who dont do a single thing with powerful fones but recieve call. Apple are excellent business folks! they aim 4 beauty, sales and efficiency(fluidity) rather than other thns! Note dat 77% of ppl are block headed stark raving retarded idiots and those r who Apple aim 4! like it or not they make their money!

By: j_111

j_111 — Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:05:54 +0000

mujhe yeh phone pasand aya…

By: istariphoenix

istariphoenix — Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:41:27 +0000

It’s amazing how badly iPhone 4 sucks. It’s also amazing how Apple Fanboys will defend it until the end of time. I will freely note first off that I am not a fanboy by any stretch, however I do have the 3GS, which I love. I did buy the iPhone 4, and it was so terrible that I returned it and went back to my current 3GS. It was just that bad. It’s hilarious to me what Apple fanboys are saying in forums and blogs all across the web, defending this thing like it’s some sacred gem, pretending all its issues don’t even exist. Ridiculous. Check out the video I made on YouTube about “An Apple Fanboy’s take on Life…”. It’s at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPcQ-cYg8iA

By: shinken

shinken — Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:36:56 +0000

Nice review. I’m based in London UK and don’t get the constant dropped calls, is that the same with all AT&T’s phones? What I do get though is reception going to zero and calls dropped that way when I hold the phone the way Apple tell us we shouldn’t (it’s the way I’ve always held phones). For Slashgear to dismiss this fundamental issue as “not a deal breaker” is ludicrous when reviewing a PHONE. I can see why others believe there may be a bias towards Apple in this review. This phone is very similar to my 2year old 3G but with a better screen, camera and is slightly faster.

By: Nedooo

Nedooo — Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:35:12 +0000

Fast response +1

By: Vincent Nguyen

Vincent Nguyen — Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:30:48 +0000

New comparison shots between iPhone 4 Retina Display and Galaxy S Super-AMOLED.

By: Nedooo

Nedooo — Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:02:40 +0000

You guys made the same mistake like Engadget reviewers with comparisson of screens of iPhone 4 and Samsung Galaxy S!!!
Well, as you pros should know or see others making that mistake, brightness on Galaxy S is separately regulated within browser. Verry unprofesional.
Are you sponsored by iRetina crew?!?!
Upload the new photos to retain your creadibility…

By: cellman

cellman — Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:10:18 +0000

Ok so apple made another gorgeous looking device, but can you really say it is a strong contender for cellphone of 2010. Besides the display what has apple done to merit the device award that others have not already done. IOS4 now sort of has multitasking, while others have had true multitasking for years, it has a forward facing camera with video chat(wifi only) the evo had that first(in the US) and can be done on 3g and 4g, oh yeah and the evo has 4g which I think is more of a cellphone milestone. I’m not trying to sound like a hater, but I guess I don’t get what apple really has done here besides play catch-up and finally change their design, which has proven to be a major flaw. Now I know why no other cell manufacturer has put the antenna on the outside of the phone, it won’t make calls. The phone still doesn’t function well as a phone, a huge problem for people that actually talk on their cell phones…maybe the phone never being attached to a cell site allows for such great battery life. I think the phone looks great but it’s not a game changer like the original and they are only doing what other companies have already done and trying to act like they are the first. No need to hate me for this, and I would love to hear people’s thoughts on what I’m missing here, since I’m not already hooked to apple and att like 77% of all iphone 4 sales went to people upgrading.

By: a1qkhan

a1qkhan — Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:08:09 +0000

This review is absolutely bias! The display comparison in this review is between the iPhone 4G and “HTC EVO 4G” not the “Samsung Galaxy S (with the Super AMOLED)”. The HTC EVO uses TFT screen, not an AMOLED screen, never mind super AMOLED display. The reviewer doesn’t know the differences between the phones. I don’t think he knows anything. You can clearly see the “HTC” on the second phone, but the reviewer is a little thick to see it. Either he’s thick, or he’s trying to con us?? This whole site is marketing “tool” for Apple. I wonder how far the reviewer (who sounds camp btw) and the Editor got their heads up Steve Jobs a**!

By: amir_rafie

amir_rafie — Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:44:39 +0000

would you compare the screens in the direct sunlight? (with maximum brightness that set in the browser)

By: amir_rafie

amir_rafie — Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:43:10 +0000

engadget made the same mistake & after that they corrected it:
http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/

everybody knows that engadget is the fan of apple, we trust on slashgear only , I wish slashgear won`t deviate with steve jobs`s money!

By: Notneeded

Notneeded — Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:26:54 +0000

those shots of the comparison between the Super AMOLED and IPS LCD are weird based on the brightness…

The browser on the Galaxy S has a Separate brightness setting that you have to turn up apart from the System brightness.