<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPad 2 Retina Display rumors under fire: prototypes aren&#8217;t next-gen iOS tablet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/ipad-2-retina-display-rumors-under-fire-prototypes-arent-next-gen-ios-tablet-19127190/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ipad-2-retina-display-rumors-under-fire-prototypes-arent-next-gen-ios-tablet-19127190/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wuss</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ipad-2-retina-display-rumors-under-fire-prototypes-arent-next-gen-ios-tablet-19127190/#comment-89677</link>
		<dc:creator>Wuss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=127190#comment-89677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the stupidest iPad 2 rumor to stay in the rumor mill for so long.

People who don&#039;t understand tech are the ones that keep propogating it. They just multiply the iPad&#039;s screen surface dimensions, with the current iPhone 4&#039;s PPi, and think they cleverly founded a spec for the iPad 2. Wrong.

As mentioned, the cost would be astronomical. Prices for high resolution screens vs low res aren&#039;t a steady incline. They multiply exponentially as you get higher, especially in a 4:3 ratio, which is much more expensive to produce then the scam 16:9 (ooohhhh &quot;HD&quot;... gimme a break) for computer displays.

Sure, a SoC might be able to drive it&#039;s normal desktop environment fine on a 2048 x 1536 display, but what about video? 720p is going to look like crap. Then Apples bread and butter App Store games will all need to be driven at 2048 x 1536 ? You kidding me. 

So let&#039;s get this straight. Pros, Steve Jobs will be able to mac-sturbate over a iPad 2 Retina display at his keynote. Cons, skyrocketed cost, shortened battery life, blurrier video, issue with GPU heavy app store games.. yeah... good job &quot;analysts&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the stupidest iPad 2 rumor to stay in the rumor mill for so long.</p>
<p>People who don&#8217;t understand tech are the ones that keep propogating it. They just multiply the iPad&#8217;s screen surface dimensions, with the current iPhone 4&#8242;s PPi, and think they cleverly founded a spec for the iPad 2. Wrong.</p>
<p>As mentioned, the cost would be astronomical. Prices for high resolution screens vs low res aren&#8217;t a steady incline. They multiply exponentially as you get higher, especially in a 4:3 ratio, which is much more expensive to produce then the scam 16:9 (ooohhhh &#8220;HD&#8221;&#8230; gimme a break) for computer displays.</p>
<p>Sure, a SoC might be able to drive it&#8217;s normal desktop environment fine on a 2048 x 1536 display, but what about video? 720p is going to look like crap. Then Apples bread and butter App Store games will all need to be driven at 2048 x 1536 ? You kidding me. </p>
<p>So let&#8217;s get this straight. Pros, Steve Jobs will be able to mac-sturbate over a iPad 2 Retina display at his keynote. Cons, skyrocketed cost, shortened battery life, blurrier video, issue with GPU heavy app store games.. yeah&#8230; good job &#8220;analysts&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
