<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intertek tests AH-IPS LCD versus AMOLED for performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/intertek-tests-ah-ips-lcd-versus-amoled-for-performance-24173893/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intertek-tests-ah-ips-lcd-versus-amoled-for-performance-24173893/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jvj</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intertek-tests-ah-ips-lcd-versus-amoled-for-performance-24173893/#comment-273918</link>
		<dc:creator>jvj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173893#comment-273918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iphone 4 has a 960 x 640 resolution in its 3.5 inch, not 4.5 inch!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iphone 4 has a 960 x 640 resolution in its 3.5 inch, not 4.5 inch!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darkangels6sic6</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intertek-tests-ah-ips-lcd-versus-amoled-for-performance-24173893/#comment-160469</link>
		<dc:creator>Darkangels6sic6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173893#comment-160469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes because Everyone is going to care more about this page and base their entire battery usage on viewing this page. wow.......kudos to you

The point is they took two things they knew they could claim better and left out every single other point that makes Amoled amazing

And most phone users aren&#039;t concerned with games? What planet are you from?

And people look at many apps, ui&#039;s, and pages that are not only white. Videos, games, and files as well. 

Also Amoled looks fuzzy next to IPS? Did you just read that somewhere? And terrible color accuracy???? The review did not say that. Amoled is a little over saturated, but not by extreme amounts. And the reason it looks like more is if you have screen brightness up anything is, plus majority of LCD&#039;s are lacking and have faded backlight looking colors.

And there is a difference between a higher resolution and a better screen.

Point is when displaying black Amoled is amazing and very power efficient because only Amoled can do so. and they make much better pictures, angles, and space saving. Amoled is well above any LCD in an overall. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes because Everyone is going to care more about this page and base their entire battery usage on viewing this page. wow&#8230;&#8230;.kudos to you</p>
<p>The point is they took two things they knew they could claim better and left out every single other point that makes Amoled amazing</p>
<p>And most phone users aren&#8217;t concerned with games? What planet are you from?</p>
<p>And people look at many apps, ui&#8217;s, and pages that are not only white. Videos, games, and files as well. </p>
<p>Also Amoled looks fuzzy next to IPS? Did you just read that somewhere? And terrible color accuracy???? The review did not say that. Amoled is a little over saturated, but not by extreme amounts. And the reason it looks like more is if you have screen brightness up anything is, plus majority of LCD&#8217;s are lacking and have faded backlight looking colors.</p>
<p>And there is a difference between a higher resolution and a better screen.</p>
<p>Point is when displaying black Amoled is amazing and very power efficient because only Amoled can do so. and they make much better pictures, angles, and space saving. Amoled is well above any LCD in an overall. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinko</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intertek-tests-ah-ips-lcd-versus-amoled-for-performance-24173893/#comment-139437</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173893#comment-139437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Troll ! Stop scamming people. These stupid sites come up like mushrooms to dupe the gullible. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Troll ! Stop scamming people. These stupid sites come up like mushrooms to dupe the gullible. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinko</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intertek-tests-ah-ips-lcd-versus-amoled-for-performance-24173893/#comment-139438</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173893#comment-139438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Troll ! Stop scamming people. These stupid sites come up like mushrooms to dupe the gullible. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Troll ! Stop scamming people. These stupid sites come up like mushrooms to dupe the gullible. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intertek-tests-ah-ips-lcd-versus-amoled-for-performance-24173893/#comment-132791</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173893#comment-132791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And obviously blacks weren&#039;t tested...

In short, comparing OLED to LCD is like comparing green oranges to green apples...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And obviously blacks weren&#8217;t tested&#8230;</p>
<p>In short, comparing OLED to LCD is like comparing green oranges to green apples&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intertek-tests-ah-ips-lcd-versus-amoled-for-performance-24173893/#comment-132792</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173893#comment-132792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And obviously blacks weren&#039;t tested...

In short, comparing OLED to LCD is like comparing green oranges to green apples...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And obviously blacks weren&#8217;t tested&#8230;</p>
<p>In short, comparing OLED to LCD is like comparing green oranges to green apples&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intertek-tests-ah-ips-lcd-versus-amoled-for-performance-24173893/#comment-132693</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173893#comment-132693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This page is mostly white.. 

Most phone users aren&#039;t concerned with games.

Amoled looks fuzzy side by side to ips screens..

We already knew the color accuracy was terrible.. again side by side obvious...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This page is mostly white.. </p>
<p>Most phone users aren&#8217;t concerned with games.</p>
<p>Amoled looks fuzzy side by side to ips screens..</p>
<p>We already knew the color accuracy was terrible.. again side by side obvious&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: First Name</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intertek-tests-ah-ips-lcd-versus-amoled-for-performance-24173893/#comment-132679</link>
		<dc:creator>First Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173893#comment-132679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not a fair comparison for power at all. They literally went for the worst case scenario for the AMOLED display knowing full well that it would do very badly, which isn&#039;t terribly surprising given that this was paid for by Apple and LG.

They state that for the power measurement they&#039;re comparing both screens when displaying full white, but that&#039;s not a typical usage model at /all/. Remember, AMOLED is more efficient when it&#039;s showing... nothing, because unlike LCDs OLED displays pay by the pixel in terms of power consumption. That&#039;s why Windows Phone 7&#039;s metro UI was designed to be mostly black.

Measure the power consumption with both displays displaying an identical video feed of typical usage (games, OS UI, etc) and I&#039;ll believe it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a fair comparison for power at all. They literally went for the worst case scenario for the AMOLED display knowing full well that it would do very badly, which isn&#8217;t terribly surprising given that this was paid for by Apple and LG.</p>
<p>They state that for the power measurement they&#8217;re comparing both screens when displaying full white, but that&#8217;s not a typical usage model at /all/. Remember, AMOLED is more efficient when it&#8217;s showing&#8230; nothing, because unlike LCDs OLED displays pay by the pixel in terms of power consumption. That&#8217;s why Windows Phone 7&#8242;s metro UI was designed to be mostly black.</p>
<p>Measure the power consumption with both displays displaying an identical video feed of typical usage (games, OS UI, etc) and I&#8217;ll believe it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intertek-tests-ah-ips-lcd-versus-amoled-for-performance-24173893/#comment-132647</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173893#comment-132647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well it certainly won&#039;t be a 4.5inch screen.  I don&#039;t see Apple making such a big jump from the 3.5inch on the iPhone 4, think about App compatibility here, developers would have to re-write their current apps just like they did with the iPad.  
I think a 4&quot;inch screen is more feasible and poses less issues for developers in terms of app compatibility.  That&#039;s what I&#039;m hoping to see with the iPhone 5.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it certainly won&#8217;t be a 4.5inch screen.  I don&#8217;t see Apple making such a big jump from the 3.5inch on the iPhone 4, think about App compatibility here, developers would have to re-write their current apps just like they did with the iPad.  <br />
I think a 4&#8243;inch screen is more feasible and poses less issues for developers in terms of app compatibility.  That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m hoping to see with the iPhone 5.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intertek-tests-ah-ips-lcd-versus-amoled-for-performance-24173893/#comment-132631</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173893#comment-132631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just paíd $20.82 for an íPad 2.64GB and my boyfriend loves his Panasoníc Lumíx GF 1 Cámera that we got for $38.79 there arriving tomorrow by UP S.I will never pay such expensive retail príces in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LCD T V to my boss for $657 which only cost me $62.81 to buy.Here is the website we use to get it all from, &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/BIDFIRST&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://BídsFírst.Com &lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just paíd $20.82 for an íPad 2.64GB and my boyfriend loves his Panasoníc Lumíx GF 1 Cámera that we got for $38.79 there arriving tomorrow by UP S.I will never pay such expensive retail príces in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LCD T V to my boss for $657 which only cost me $62.81 to buy.Here is the website we use to get it all from, <a href="http://bit.ly/BIDFIRST" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://BídsFírst.Com" rel="nofollow">http://BídsFírst.Com</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intertek-tests-ah-ips-lcd-versus-amoled-for-performance-24173893/#comment-132632</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173893#comment-132632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just paíd $20.82 for an íPad 2.64GB and my boyfriend loves his Panasoníc Lumíx GF 1 Cámera that we got for $38.79 there arriving tomorrow by UP S.I will never pay such expensive retail príces in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LCD T V to my boss for $657 which only cost me $62.81 to buy.Here is the website we use to get it all from, &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/BIDFIRST&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://BídsFírst.Com &lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just paíd $20.82 for an íPad 2.64GB and my boyfriend loves his Panasoníc Lumíx GF 1 Cámera that we got for $38.79 there arriving tomorrow by UP S.I will never pay such expensive retail príces in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LCD T V to my boss for $657 which only cost me $62.81 to buy.Here is the website we use to get it all from, <a href="http://bit.ly/BIDFIRST" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://BídsFírst.Com" rel="nofollow">http://BídsFírst.Com</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intertek-tests-ah-ips-lcd-versus-amoled-for-performance-24173893/#comment-132633</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=173893#comment-132633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just paíd $20.82 for an íPad 2.64GB and my boyfriend loves his Panasoníc Lumíx GF 1 Cámera that we got for $38.79 there arriving tomorrow by UP S.I will never pay such expensive retail príces in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LCD T V to my boss for $657 which only cost me $62.81 to buy.Here is the website we use to get it all from, &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/BIDFIRST&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://BídsFírst.Com &lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just paíd $20.82 for an íPad 2.64GB and my boyfriend loves his Panasoníc Lumíx GF 1 Cámera that we got for $38.79 there arriving tomorrow by UP S.I will never pay such expensive retail príces in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LCD T V to my boss for $657 which only cost me $62.81 to buy.Here is the website we use to get it all from, <a href="http://bit.ly/BIDFIRST" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://BídsFírst.Com" rel="nofollow">http://BídsFírst.Com</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
