<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Xeon Phi: a Teraflop supercomputer in a PCIe card</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/intel-xeon-phi-a-teraflop-supercomputer-in-a-pcie-card-18234393/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intel-xeon-phi-a-teraflop-supercomputer-in-a-pcie-card-18234393/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsol</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intel-xeon-phi-a-teraflop-supercomputer-in-a-pcie-card-18234393/#comment-224155</link>
		<dc:creator>dsol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=234393#comment-224155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this the zombie remains of Intel&#039;s &quot;Larrabee&quot; GPU project, rebranded as a HPC component? 512bit wide SIMD was definitely a Larrabee feature.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this the zombie remains of Intel&#8217;s &#8220;Larrabee&#8221; GPU project, rebranded as a HPC component? 512bit wide SIMD was definitely a Larrabee feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyberGusa</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intel-xeon-phi-a-teraflop-supercomputer-in-a-pcie-card-18234393/#comment-218035</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberGusa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=234393#comment-218035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No confusion, how effective the product will be in real world use remains to be seen but it&#039;s suppose to be cluster scalable and specifically intended for parallel computing environments. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No confusion, how effective the product will be in real world use remains to be seen but it&#8217;s suppose to be cluster scalable and specifically intended for parallel computing environments. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digi_owl</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intel-xeon-phi-a-teraflop-supercomputer-in-a-pcie-card-18234393/#comment-218019</link>
		<dc:creator>digi_owl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=234393#comment-218019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let us not confuse linear in the sense of increasing processing power, and linear in doing the computing with one step following the next.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let us not confuse linear in the sense of increasing processing power, and linear in doing the computing with one step following the next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyberGusa</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intel-xeon-phi-a-teraflop-supercomputer-in-a-pcie-card-18234393/#comment-217469</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberGusa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=234393#comment-217469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the server market highly parallel is pretty common, and is preferable for saving space and costs, mind the stated Linux support as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the server market highly parallel is pretty common, and is preferable for saving space and costs, mind the stated Linux support as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digi_owl</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intel-xeon-phi-a-teraflop-supercomputer-in-a-pcie-card-18234393/#comment-217463</link>
		<dc:creator>digi_owl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=234393#comment-217463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure if it can be considered linear. It is almost a step backwards towards how the Altair shipped, there all the actual components was a daughterboards like the GPU and maybe audio is today. This seems to move the CPU back out alongside the GPU, meaning that a motherboard of all 16xPCIe could hold plenty of these. But to actually make use of that computing, the code needs to be highly parallel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if it can be considered linear. It is almost a step backwards towards how the Altair shipped, there all the actual components was a daughterboards like the GPU and maybe audio is today. This seems to move the CPU back out alongside the GPU, meaning that a motherboard of all 16xPCIe could hold plenty of these. But to actually make use of that computing, the code needs to be highly parallel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Carr</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intel-xeon-phi-a-teraflop-supercomputer-in-a-pcie-card-18234393/#comment-217458</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Carr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=234393#comment-217458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So...will this actually result in a substantial step forward in processing power, or is it another linear step? I can&#039;t tell from the article.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230;will this actually result in a substantial step forward in processing power, or is it another linear step? I can&#8217;t tell from the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
