http://www.slashgear.com/intel-medfield-phone-benchmarked-bests-nexus-but-trails-tegra-3-09217688/ Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions Wed, 09 May 2012 02:43:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://www.slashgear.com/intel-medfield-phone-benchmarked-bests-nexus-but-trails-tegra-3-09217688/#comment-192246 Mil Sat, 10 Mar 2012 02:51:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=217688#comment-192246 What do you mean by “once again beat out the Galaxy Nexus?”  From your own article the Nexus won the first benchmark and the Santa Clara won the second.  ”Again” implies multiple wins…

]]> http://www.slashgear.com/intel-medfield-phone-benchmarked-bests-nexus-but-trails-tegra-3-09217688/#comment-192058 Gandalthewhite Fri, 09 Mar 2012 15:17:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=217688#comment-192058 Impressive that a single-core has that high of a score compared to Tegra 3.

]]> http://www.slashgear.com/intel-medfield-phone-benchmarked-bests-nexus-but-trails-tegra-3-09217688/#comment-192029 ph00ny Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:05:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=217688#comment-192029 Another benchmark result hugely depended on the browser (software) used.
Same reason why honeycomb running on inferior hardware has beat high end gingerbread units

]]> http://www.slashgear.com/intel-medfield-phone-benchmarked-bests-nexus-but-trails-tegra-3-09217688/#comment-192030 ph00ny Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:05:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=217688#comment-192030 Another benchmark result hugely depended on the browser (software) used.
Same reason why honeycomb running on inferior hardware has beat high end gingerbread units

]]>