<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Atom N455 and N475 quietly debut</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/intel-atom-n455-and-n475-quietly-debut-0176168/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intel-atom-n455-and-n475-quietly-debut-0176168/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 01:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fuckthegrammar</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intel-atom-n455-and-n475-quietly-debut-0176168/#comment-119630</link>
		<dc:creator>Fuckthegrammar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 03:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=76168#comment-119630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WTF are the comments about? It looks like the grammar police have entered the scene. If you can&#039;t contribute to the subject matter, then comment on the grammar? Bunch of I-D-I-0-T-S !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF are the comments about? It looks like the grammar police have entered the scene. If you can&#8217;t contribute to the subject matter, then comment on the grammar? Bunch of I-D-I-0-T-S !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fuckthegrammar</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intel-atom-n455-and-n475-quietly-debut-0176168/#comment-119631</link>
		<dc:creator>Fuckthegrammar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 03:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=76168#comment-119631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WTF are the comments about? It looks like the grammar police have entered the scene. If you can&#039;t contribute to the subject matter, then comment on the grammar? Bunch of I-D-I-0-T-S !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF are the comments about? It looks like the grammar police have entered the scene. If you can&#8217;t contribute to the subject matter, then comment on the grammar? Bunch of I-D-I-0-T-S !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senazad</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intel-atom-n455-and-n475-quietly-debut-0176168/#comment-109993</link>
		<dc:creator>Senazad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=76168#comment-109993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your language is poor, when you use &#039;moron&#039; and &#039;idiot&#039;, you are describing yourself, isn&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your language is poor, when you use &#8216;moron&#8217; and &#8216;idiot&#8217;, you are describing yourself, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Back2School</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intel-atom-n455-and-n475-quietly-debut-0176168/#comment-99290</link>
		<dc:creator>Back2School</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 06:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=76168#comment-99290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.cgl.uwaterloo.ca/~csk/its.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cgl.uwaterloo.ca/~csk/its.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cgl.uwaterloo.ca/~csk/its.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Back2School</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intel-atom-n455-and-n475-quietly-debut-0176168/#comment-99288</link>
		<dc:creator>Back2School</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 06:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=76168#comment-99288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Singular -- netbook
Plural -- netbooks

No apostrophe.

Do they not teach this in schools these days, or did you miss the lesson on punctuation? It&#039;s pretty basic you know. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Singular &#8212; netbook<br />
Plural &#8212; netbooks</p>
<p>No apostrophe.</p>
<p>Do they not teach this in schools these days, or did you miss the lesson on punctuation? It&#8217;s pretty basic you know. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A738953</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intel-atom-n455-and-n475-quietly-debut-0176168/#comment-96681</link>
		<dc:creator>A738953</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=76168#comment-96681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, what a moron.  Netbook&#039;s do what they are designed for, and they do it well.  Who ever said that they are suitable for playing games?  I bet this idiot would buy a Ford Pinto and complain that it doesn&#039;t have the performance of a Ferrari.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, what a moron.  Netbook&#8217;s do what they are designed for, and they do it well.  Who ever said that they are suitable for playing games?  I bet this idiot would buy a Ford Pinto and complain that it doesn&#8217;t have the performance of a Ferrari.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NJ</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intel-atom-n455-and-n475-quietly-debut-0176168/#comment-72467</link>
		<dc:creator>NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=76168#comment-72467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Why is the netbook so lame in it’s performance rating compared to even desktop models of the past? &quot;

processor power = 5W.  nuff said.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why is the netbook so lame in it’s performance rating compared to even desktop models of the past? &#8221;</p>
<p>processor power = 5W.  nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intel-atom-n455-and-n475-quietly-debut-0176168/#comment-71923</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=76168#comment-71923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My god, where did you learn English? Do you need a ring decoder out of a cereal box to understand that gibberish?  Seriously, learn grammar and then criticize the marketplace. Until that day, keep your unintelligible comments to yourself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My god, where did you learn English? Do you need a ring decoder out of a cereal box to understand that gibberish?  Seriously, learn grammar and then criticize the marketplace. Until that day, keep your unintelligible comments to yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiam</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intel-atom-n455-and-n475-quietly-debut-0176168/#comment-71739</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=76168#comment-71739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is the netbook so lame in it&#039;s performance rating compared to even desktop models of the past? Is it because it didn&#039;t have onboard video hd mp4 avc level hardware video decoding or is it because of the poor to under low res video display resolution in whatever size it is in? Not even at old resolution max for some basic games that require it and this is an affront to admitting dual core computers were a mistake due to power considerations and quirky offloading of threads into each processor evenly. Who had the moronic idea of backtracking laptop technology like this in the first place? Even Apple computers did better with it&#039;s so called innovations at same size for better specs compared to catch up intel and whatever else the super cheapo parts and cpu manufacturers created for the broader market like Microsoft&#039;s hobbled and super basic windows 7 version in these computers designs who will improve a bit later. 
 Next time an offer to almost give away basic learning computers to the third world, why not figure a way to make leftover technology last  long enough to be the useable refuse for them and not cost so much. Hand me downs are better than no downs at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is the netbook so lame in it&#8217;s performance rating compared to even desktop models of the past? Is it because it didn&#8217;t have onboard video hd mp4 avc level hardware video decoding or is it because of the poor to under low res video display resolution in whatever size it is in? Not even at old resolution max for some basic games that require it and this is an affront to admitting dual core computers were a mistake due to power considerations and quirky offloading of threads into each processor evenly. Who had the moronic idea of backtracking laptop technology like this in the first place? Even Apple computers did better with it&#8217;s so called innovations at same size for better specs compared to catch up intel and whatever else the super cheapo parts and cpu manufacturers created for the broader market like Microsoft&#8217;s hobbled and super basic windows 7 version in these computers designs who will improve a bit later.<br />
 Next time an offer to almost give away basic learning computers to the third world, why not figure a way to make leftover technology last  long enough to be the useable refuse for them and not cost so much. Hand me downs are better than no downs at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
