<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Atom accelerates: Cedar Trail for netbooks, Medfield for sub-9mm gaming tablets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/intel-atom-accelerates-cedar-trail-for-netbooks-medfield-for-sub-9mm-gaming-tablets-31155794/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intel-atom-accelerates-cedar-trail-for-netbooks-medfield-for-sub-9mm-gaming-tablets-31155794/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/intel-atom-accelerates-cedar-trail-for-netbooks-medfield-for-sub-9mm-gaming-tablets-31155794/#comment-116135</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 15:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=155794#comment-116135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cant wait.  They better hurry though because while Medfield is better with power consumption and performance than the tegra 2, I doubt that is true about the tegra 3.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cant wait.  They better hurry though because while Medfield is better with power consumption and performance than the tegra 2, I doubt that is true about the tegra 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
