http://www.slashgear.com/intel-32nm-medfield-soc-leaks-with-specs-and-benchmarks-27204670/ Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions Thu, 17 May 2012 17:46:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://www.slashgear.com/intel-32nm-medfield-soc-leaks-with-specs-and-benchmarks-27204670/#comment-167000 hello Wed, 28 Dec 2011 09:57:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=204670#comment-167000 An ARM Cortex-A9 quad-core SoC runs at 5 watts during load so about 1.25 watts per core. Saying intels chip runs at 2.6 to 3.6 watts is high isn’t a correct statement and is simply straight up wrong. If the Intel CPU is downclocked down from 1.6 ghz then it can be more efficient than in this review. Anyways at the current power said in the review they are on par with arm. Intel CPU is faster too and hardware, software, programs, most likely aren’t fully developed to support the new CPU also so expect performance to increase more by time of release and further afterwards. Intel is sort of playing catch up in the mobile space and finally they have a winning chip. They have figured out the formula create a efficient mobile chip so now that they have the ingredients they are going to be a force to wrecken with in the future.

]]>