<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IE9 5x more malware secure than Firefox say researchers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/ie9-5x-more-malware-secure-than-firefox-say-researchers-16119854/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ie9-5x-more-malware-secure-than-firefox-say-researchers-16119854/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 18:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: -J-</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ie9-5x-more-malware-secure-than-firefox-say-researchers-16119854/#comment-107829</link>
		<dc:creator>-J-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=119854#comment-107829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... just to clarify: several months ago when article was written, IE9 and Firefox4 were both in beta, while IE8 and firefox 3.6 were the &quot;fully up to date&quot; versions. The author makes no mention of whether Chrome was or was not 10 times more secure. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; just to clarify: several months ago when article was written, IE9 and Firefox4 were both in beta, while IE8 and firefox 3.6 were the &#8220;fully up to date&#8221; versions. The author makes no mention of whether Chrome was or was not 10 times more secure. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -J-</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ie9-5x-more-malware-secure-than-firefox-say-researchers-16119854/#comment-107827</link>
		<dc:creator>-J-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=119854#comment-107827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IE9 versus firefox 3.6 is a silly comparison - if you take a newer version of IE and compare it to an older version of Firefox, what do you expect? IE8 and firefox 3.6 are oudated and insecure, so let&#039;s talk about the browsers that people are actually installing on their computers today: IE9, firefox 4, and Chrome 10.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE9 versus firefox 3.6 is a silly comparison &#8211; if you take a newer version of IE and compare it to an older version of Firefox, what do you expect? IE8 and firefox 3.6 are oudated and insecure, so let&#8217;s talk about the browsers that people are actually installing on their computers today: IE9, firefox 4, and Chrome 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Ward</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ie9-5x-more-malware-secure-than-firefox-say-researchers-16119854/#comment-82210</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=119854#comment-82210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What they did NOT test is just as interesting as what they did.
Since they didn&#039;t say what security extensions were loaded on their test version of Firefox, I assume there were none, which would have significantly altered the results. 

Also, they tested IE9, but not Opera 11? That&#039;s its own sort of interesting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What they did NOT test is just as interesting as what they did.<br />
Since they didn&#8217;t say what security extensions were loaded on their test version of Firefox, I assume there were none, which would have significantly altered the results. </p>
<p>Also, they tested IE9, but not Opera 11? That&#8217;s its own sort of interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ie9-5x-more-malware-secure-than-firefox-say-researchers-16119854/#comment-82180</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=119854#comment-82180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read the test itself: &quot;This private test was contracted by Microsoft’s SmartScreen product team as an internal benchmark, leveraging our Live Testing framework.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read the test itself: &#8220;This private test was contracted by Microsoft’s SmartScreen product team as an internal benchmark, leveraging our Live Testing framework.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImperfectLink</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/ie9-5x-more-malware-secure-than-firefox-say-researchers-16119854/#comment-82143</link>
		<dc:creator>ImperfectLink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=119854#comment-82143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the end there&#039;s still no replacement for common sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the end there&#8217;s still no replacement for common sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
