<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Huawei To US Government: Please Investigate Us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/huawei-to-us-government-please-investigate-us-25136220/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/huawei-to-us-government-please-investigate-us-25136220/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 02:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/huawei-to-us-government-please-investigate-us-25136220/#comment-97018</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 10:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136220#comment-97018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please investigate us and properly eliminate all these groundless accusations. That is such a forthcoming statement from us, that you must now properly think we are nice guys, since we have now proven that we are nice guys, by our sincere words, and that Huawei alone never sent anyone off for reeducation over a tiny tweet.  Therefore you do not really need to investigate us, but you may do so if you must, since we know that backdoors may be delivered just-in-time through plausibly deniable vulnerabilities (and so hard to find, could take years to turn up under the eyes off many bug experts) that are to be expected in complex firmware.  You can have all the source code you want, you won&#039;t find anything (again except vulnerabilites that could be used for backdoors, try and prove that we planned on that!).  It&#039;s all about trust, guanxi, and some prime chinese slice delivered hot to smelly white guys from Amerilink who did their damndest for some more of that.  We&#039;ll get there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please investigate us and properly eliminate all these groundless accusations. That is such a forthcoming statement from us, that you must now properly think we are nice guys, since we have now proven that we are nice guys, by our sincere words, and that Huawei alone never sent anyone off for reeducation over a tiny tweet.  Therefore you do not really need to investigate us, but you may do so if you must, since we know that backdoors may be delivered just-in-time through plausibly deniable vulnerabilities (and so hard to find, could take years to turn up under the eyes off many bug experts) that are to be expected in complex firmware.  You can have all the source code you want, you won&#8217;t find anything (again except vulnerabilites that could be used for backdoors, try and prove that we planned on that!).  It&#8217;s all about trust, guanxi, and some prime chinese slice delivered hot to smelly white guys from Amerilink who did their damndest for some more of that.  We&#8217;ll get there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/huawei-to-us-government-please-investigate-us-25136220/#comment-96975</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 01:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=136220#comment-96975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh dear. Huawei should not want to be investigated by the government. The TSA &#039;investigated&#039; me. I still have nightmares.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear. Huawei should not want to be investigated by the government. The TSA &#8216;investigated&#8217; me. I still have nightmares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
