<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTC to return to Hero Device strategy for 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/htc-to-return-to-hero-device-strategy-for-2012-26210886/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-to-return-to-hero-device-strategy-for-2012-26210886/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 17:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaxzfon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-to-return-to-hero-device-strategy-for-2012-26210886/#comment-180491</link>
		<dc:creator>jaxzfon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210886#comment-180491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who let this guy out of the walled garden?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who let this guy out of the walled garden?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warrio W</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-to-return-to-hero-device-strategy-for-2012-26210886/#comment-176358</link>
		<dc:creator>Warrio W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210886#comment-176358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If they don&#039;t change their strategy, they&#039;ll die for ever.
They are too late to publish new versions of android, slower hardware compared to Samsung. Old and unfashioned design]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they don&#8217;t change their strategy, they&#8217;ll die for ever.<br />
They are too late to publish new versions of android, slower hardware compared to Samsung. Old and unfashioned design</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warrio W</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-to-return-to-hero-device-strategy-for-2012-26210886/#comment-176359</link>
		<dc:creator>Warrio W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210886#comment-176359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If they don&#039;t change their strategy, they&#039;ll die for ever.
They are too late to publish new versions of android, slower hardware compared to Samsung. Old and unfashioned design]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they don&#8217;t change their strategy, they&#8217;ll die for ever.<br />
They are too late to publish new versions of android, slower hardware compared to Samsung. Old and unfashioned design</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jsteinmetz1313</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-to-return-to-hero-device-strategy-for-2012-26210886/#comment-176335</link>
		<dc:creator>Jsteinmetz1313</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210886#comment-176335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fewer not 1 choice and better quality... I&#039;ve been with HTC for about 6 years &quot;preandroid&quot; and this makes me happy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fewer not 1 choice and better quality&#8230; I&#8217;ve been with HTC for about 6 years &#8220;preandroid&#8221; and this makes me happy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jsteinmetz1313</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-to-return-to-hero-device-strategy-for-2012-26210886/#comment-176336</link>
		<dc:creator>Jsteinmetz1313</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210886#comment-176336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fewer not 1 choice and better quality... I&#039;ve been with HTC for about 6 years &quot;preandroid&quot; and this makes me happy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fewer not 1 choice and better quality&#8230; I&#8217;ve been with HTC for about 6 years &#8220;preandroid&#8221; and this makes me happy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-to-return-to-hero-device-strategy-for-2012-26210886/#comment-176334</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210886#comment-176334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MY TELEPHONE CHOICE IS SUPERIOR TO YOUR TELEPHONE CHOICE, MEANING I AM THE MORE IMPRESSIVE INDIVIDUAL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MY TELEPHONE CHOICE IS SUPERIOR TO YOUR TELEPHONE CHOICE, MEANING I AM THE MORE IMPRESSIVE INDIVIDUAL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troll</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-to-return-to-hero-device-strategy-for-2012-26210886/#comment-176324</link>
		<dc:creator>Troll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210886#comment-176324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has to MANDATE that stock Android be retained and user accessible above and beyond any desired edits by OEMs.  This continues to be the problem.  HTC, Samsung, and other OEMS are concerned with differentiation, as they should, but users who hope for an OEM that supports the Android as soon as Google releases the source code also may not realize that it&#039;s the CARRIERS that hold back updates.  Carriers are KNOWN to sit on updates for months in attempts to sell more, newer releases instead of updating slightly older Android devices, hoping the impatient will purchase new devices at retail.  I bit on that sour grape one time and will never do so again.  From now own, I will only buy a device that is the result of a vertically integrated process, meaning that the OS of the phone is supported simultaneously across all devices.  Right now, the only option is iOS, even though BlackBerry is also vertically integrated, it does not update devices at the same time when new features are programmed.  BlackBerry has its own internal Windows Mobile thing going on and needs to scale itself to focus the hardware around the OS instead of how OEMs have done for Android and how they used to do for Windows Mobile.  Windows Phone, while quite consistent due to stricter hardware guidelines regardless of OEM, still needs Microsoft to take it 100% in house with a dedicated &quot;hero&quot; device or two that remain updated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has to MANDATE that stock Android be retained and user accessible above and beyond any desired edits by OEMs.  This continues to be the problem.  HTC, Samsung, and other OEMS are concerned with differentiation, as they should, but users who hope for an OEM that supports the Android as soon as Google releases the source code also may not realize that it&#8217;s the CARRIERS that hold back updates.  Carriers are KNOWN to sit on updates for months in attempts to sell more, newer releases instead of updating slightly older Android devices, hoping the impatient will purchase new devices at retail.  I bit on that sour grape one time and will never do so again.  From now own, I will only buy a device that is the result of a vertically integrated process, meaning that the OS of the phone is supported simultaneously across all devices.  Right now, the only option is iOS, even though BlackBerry is also vertically integrated, it does not update devices at the same time when new features are programmed.  BlackBerry has its own internal Windows Mobile thing going on and needs to scale itself to focus the hardware around the OS instead of how OEMs have done for Android and how they used to do for Windows Mobile.  Windows Phone, while quite consistent due to stricter hardware guidelines regardless of OEM, still needs Microsoft to take it 100% in house with a dedicated &#8220;hero&#8221; device or two that remain updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troll</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-to-return-to-hero-device-strategy-for-2012-26210886/#comment-176325</link>
		<dc:creator>Troll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210886#comment-176325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has to MANDATE that stock Android be retained and user accessible above and beyond any desired edits by OEMs.  This continues to be the problem.  HTC, Samsung, and other OEMS are concerned with differentiation, as they should, but users who hope for an OEM that supports the Android as soon as Google releases the source code also may not realize that it&#039;s the CARRIERS that hold back updates.  Carriers are KNOWN to sit on updates for months in attempts to sell more, newer releases instead of updating slightly older Android devices, hoping the impatient will purchase new devices at retail.  I bit on that sour grape one time and will never do so again.  From now own, I will only buy a device that is the result of a vertically integrated process, meaning that the OS of the phone is supported simultaneously across all devices.  Right now, the only option is iOS, even though BlackBerry is also vertically integrated, it does not update devices at the same time when new features are programmed.  BlackBerry has its own internal Windows Mobile thing going on and needs to scale itself to focus the hardware around the OS instead of how OEMs have done for Android and how they used to do for Windows Mobile.  Windows Phone, while quite consistent due to stricter hardware guidelines regardless of OEM, still needs Microsoft to take it 100% in house with a dedicated &quot;hero&quot; device or two that remain updated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has to MANDATE that stock Android be retained and user accessible above and beyond any desired edits by OEMs.  This continues to be the problem.  HTC, Samsung, and other OEMS are concerned with differentiation, as they should, but users who hope for an OEM that supports the Android as soon as Google releases the source code also may not realize that it&#8217;s the CARRIERS that hold back updates.  Carriers are KNOWN to sit on updates for months in attempts to sell more, newer releases instead of updating slightly older Android devices, hoping the impatient will purchase new devices at retail.  I bit on that sour grape one time and will never do so again.  From now own, I will only buy a device that is the result of a vertically integrated process, meaning that the OS of the phone is supported simultaneously across all devices.  Right now, the only option is iOS, even though BlackBerry is also vertically integrated, it does not update devices at the same time when new features are programmed.  BlackBerry has its own internal Windows Mobile thing going on and needs to scale itself to focus the hardware around the OS instead of how OEMs have done for Android and how they used to do for Windows Mobile.  Windows Phone, while quite consistent due to stricter hardware guidelines regardless of OEM, still needs Microsoft to take it 100% in house with a dedicated &#8220;hero&#8221; device or two that remain updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troll</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-to-return-to-hero-device-strategy-for-2012-26210886/#comment-176320</link>
		<dc:creator>Troll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210886#comment-176320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has to MANDATE that stock Android be retained and user accessible above and beyond any desired edits by OEMs.  This continues to be the problem.  HTC, Samsung, and other OEMS are concerned with differentiation, as they should, but users who hope for an OEM that supports the Android as soon as Google releases the source code also may not realize that it&#039;s the CARRIERS that hold back updates.  Carriers are KNOWN to sit on updates for months in attempts to sell more, newer releases instead of updating slightly older Android devices, hoping the impatient will purchase new devices at retail.  I bit on that sour grape one time and will never do so again.  From now own, I will only buy a device that is the result of a vertically integrated process, meaning that the OS of the phone is supported simultaneously across all devices.  Right now, the only option is iOS, even though BlackBerry is also vertically integrated, it does not update devices at the same time when new features are programmed.  BlackBerry has its own internal Windows Mobile thing going on and needs to scale itself to focus the hardware around the OS instead of how OEMs have done for Android and how they used to do for Windows Mobile.  Windows Phone, while quite consistent due to stricter hardware guidelines regardless of OEM, still needs Microsoft to take it 100% in house with a dedicated &quot;hero&quot; device or two that remain updated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has to MANDATE that stock Android be retained and user accessible above and beyond any desired edits by OEMs.  This continues to be the problem.  HTC, Samsung, and other OEMS are concerned with differentiation, as they should, but users who hope for an OEM that supports the Android as soon as Google releases the source code also may not realize that it&#8217;s the CARRIERS that hold back updates.  Carriers are KNOWN to sit on updates for months in attempts to sell more, newer releases instead of updating slightly older Android devices, hoping the impatient will purchase new devices at retail.  I bit on that sour grape one time and will never do so again.  From now own, I will only buy a device that is the result of a vertically integrated process, meaning that the OS of the phone is supported simultaneously across all devices.  Right now, the only option is iOS, even though BlackBerry is also vertically integrated, it does not update devices at the same time when new features are programmed.  BlackBerry has its own internal Windows Mobile thing going on and needs to scale itself to focus the hardware around the OS instead of how OEMs have done for Android and how they used to do for Windows Mobile.  Windows Phone, while quite consistent due to stricter hardware guidelines regardless of OEM, still needs Microsoft to take it 100% in house with a dedicated &#8220;hero&#8221; device or two that remain updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troll</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-to-return-to-hero-device-strategy-for-2012-26210886/#comment-176321</link>
		<dc:creator>Troll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210886#comment-176321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has to MANDATE that stock Android be retained and user accessible above and beyond any desired edits by OEMs.  This continues to be the problem.  HTC, Samsung, and other OEMS are concerned with differentiation, as they should, but users who hope for an OEM that supports the Android as soon as Google releases the source code also may not realize that it&#039;s the CARRIERS that hold back updates.  Carriers are KNOWN to sit on updates for months in attempts to sell more, newer releases instead of updating slightly older Android devices, hoping the impatient will purchase new devices at retail.  I bit on that sour grape one time and will never do so again.  From now own, I will only buy a device that is the result of a vertically integrated process, meaning that the OS of the phone is supported simultaneously across all devices.  Right now, the only option is iOS, even though BlackBerry is also vertically integrated, it does not update devices at the same time when new features are programmed.  BlackBerry has its own internal Windows Mobile thing going on and needs to scale itself to focus the hardware around the OS instead of how OEMs have done for Android and how they used to do for Windows Mobile.  Windows Phone, while quite consistent due to stricter hardware guidelines regardless of OEM, still needs Microsoft to take it 100% in house with a dedicated &quot;hero&quot; device or two that remain updated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has to MANDATE that stock Android be retained and user accessible above and beyond any desired edits by OEMs.  This continues to be the problem.  HTC, Samsung, and other OEMS are concerned with differentiation, as they should, but users who hope for an OEM that supports the Android as soon as Google releases the source code also may not realize that it&#8217;s the CARRIERS that hold back updates.  Carriers are KNOWN to sit on updates for months in attempts to sell more, newer releases instead of updating slightly older Android devices, hoping the impatient will purchase new devices at retail.  I bit on that sour grape one time and will never do so again.  From now own, I will only buy a device that is the result of a vertically integrated process, meaning that the OS of the phone is supported simultaneously across all devices.  Right now, the only option is iOS, even though BlackBerry is also vertically integrated, it does not update devices at the same time when new features are programmed.  BlackBerry has its own internal Windows Mobile thing going on and needs to scale itself to focus the hardware around the OS instead of how OEMs have done for Android and how they used to do for Windows Mobile.  Windows Phone, while quite consistent due to stricter hardware guidelines regardless of OEM, still needs Microsoft to take it 100% in house with a dedicated &#8220;hero&#8221; device or two that remain updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThunderBone</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-to-return-to-hero-device-strategy-for-2012-26210886/#comment-176312</link>
		<dc:creator>ThunderBone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210886#comment-176312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haha ... So the way forward in Android camp is to.......drum roll.... Reduce choice!

Jeez I never thought I would see this realization dawning on Droidbois and their masters. And they said less choice is meant only for morons and iFans. Look who is cribbing with too much choice! 

Motorola is going to pursue the same strategy and soon everyone else in Android camp will too... Lol . Well to be fair the writing on the wall was clear - less devices means less development and supply chain costs, more profits and less fragmentation.

This is what Apple realized long time back... as back as in 1997 when SJ came back to Apple and slashed the product lines and simplified them in an almost Zen fashion. As again where Apple goes Droidbois and their masters go. They keep on Aping Apple. They will never learn new things on their own. The biggest iLemmings are Droidbois and their masters. They dont even know it yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha &#8230; So the way forward in Android camp is to&#8230;&#8230;.drum roll&#8230;. Reduce choice!</p>
<p>Jeez I never thought I would see this realization dawning on Droidbois and their masters. And they said less choice is meant only for morons and iFans. Look who is cribbing with too much choice! </p>
<p>Motorola is going to pursue the same strategy and soon everyone else in Android camp will too&#8230; Lol . Well to be fair the writing on the wall was clear &#8211; less devices means less development and supply chain costs, more profits and less fragmentation.</p>
<p>This is what Apple realized long time back&#8230; as back as in 1997 when SJ came back to Apple and slashed the product lines and simplified them in an almost Zen fashion. As again where Apple goes Droidbois and their masters go. They keep on Aping Apple. They will never learn new things on their own. The biggest iLemmings are Droidbois and their masters. They dont even know it yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThunderBone</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-to-return-to-hero-device-strategy-for-2012-26210886/#comment-176313</link>
		<dc:creator>ThunderBone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210886#comment-176313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haha ... So the way forward in Android camp is to.......drum roll.... Reduce choice!

Jeez I never thought I would see this realization dawning on Droidbois and their masters. And they said less choice is meant only for morons and iFans. Look who is cribbing with too much choice! 

Motorola is going to pursue the same strategy and soon everyone else in Android camp will too... Lol . Well to be fair the writing on the wall was clear - less devices means less development and supply chain costs, more profits and less fragmentation.

This is what Apple realized long time back... as back as in 1997 when SJ came back to Apple and slashed the product lines and simplified them in an almost Zen fashion. As again where Apple goes Droidbois and their masters go. They keep on Aping Apple. They will never learn new things on their own. The biggest iLemmings are Droidbois and their masters. They dont even know it yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha &#8230; So the way forward in Android camp is to&#8230;&#8230;.drum roll&#8230;. Reduce choice!</p>
<p>Jeez I never thought I would see this realization dawning on Droidbois and their masters. And they said less choice is meant only for morons and iFans. Look who is cribbing with too much choice! </p>
<p>Motorola is going to pursue the same strategy and soon everyone else in Android camp will too&#8230; Lol . Well to be fair the writing on the wall was clear &#8211; less devices means less development and supply chain costs, more profits and less fragmentation.</p>
<p>This is what Apple realized long time back&#8230; as back as in 1997 when SJ came back to Apple and slashed the product lines and simplified them in an almost Zen fashion. As again where Apple goes Droidbois and their masters go. They keep on Aping Apple. They will never learn new things on their own. The biggest iLemmings are Droidbois and their masters. They dont even know it yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boar</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-to-return-to-hero-device-strategy-for-2012-26210886/#comment-176296</link>
		<dc:creator>Boar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210886#comment-176296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s makes only a half of a boar :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s makes only a half of a boar :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troll</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-to-return-to-hero-device-strategy-for-2012-26210886/#comment-176285</link>
		<dc:creator>Troll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210886#comment-176285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s get some LTE Windows Phones on Verizon already (with global GSM)! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s get some LTE Windows Phones on Verizon already (with global GSM)! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkintheDark</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-to-return-to-hero-device-strategy-for-2012-26210886/#comment-176284</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkintheDark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210886#comment-176284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As long as they&#039;re all based on ICS. Another wonderful step would be to make Sense UI optional.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as they&#8217;re all based on ICS. Another wonderful step would be to make Sense UI optional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-to-return-to-hero-device-strategy-for-2012-26210886/#comment-176272</link>
		<dc:creator>L Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210886#comment-176272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great step in the right direction - ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great step in the right direction &#8211; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-to-return-to-hero-device-strategy-for-2012-26210886/#comment-176273</link>
		<dc:creator>L Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210886#comment-176273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great step in the right direction - ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great step in the right direction &#8211; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
