<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTC EVO 4G LTE Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 14:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: deepairdiver</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/#comment-212324</link>
		<dc:creator>deepairdiver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 01:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227839#comment-212324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yes it does. certain circumstances dictate the ability to change / charge the battery away from a mains power source.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes it does. certain circumstances dictate the ability to change / charge the battery away from a mains power source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fox_orian</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/#comment-212028</link>
		<dc:creator>fox_orian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227839#comment-212028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So defensive!

Sales aside, which I&#039;d like to see citations for, you have to admit that HTC is rolling out some killer hardware nontheless.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So defensive!</p>
<p>Sales aside, which I&#8217;d like to see citations for, you have to admit that HTC is rolling out some killer hardware nontheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Waldschmidt</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/#comment-210645</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Waldschmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 03:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227839#comment-210645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would just like to add that it seems a couple little things were missed in hardware. It has a dedicated camera button that none of the one series have. The battery is 200mah larger than anything currently out in the one series. Oh and the deal maker imo is that this device supports SD cards while the rest of the one series does not. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would just like to add that it seems a couple little things were missed in hardware. It has a dedicated camera button that none of the one series have. The battery is 200mah larger than anything currently out in the one series. Oh and the deal maker imo is that this device supports SD cards while the rest of the one series does not. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zak</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/#comment-210540</link>
		<dc:creator>Zak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227839#comment-210540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good to know. I also have an EVO4G and am on my 2nd battery...which is why I&#039;m concerned - but so far, this phone seems like it&#039;d fit my needs better than the Samsung Galaxy SIII]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to know. I also have an EVO4G and am on my 2nd battery&#8230;which is why I&#8217;m concerned &#8211; but so far, this phone seems like it&#8217;d fit my needs better than the Samsung Galaxy SIII</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamesphelpsjr</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/#comment-210266</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamesphelpsjr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227839#comment-210266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m an OG EVO4G owner since launch day and have my pre-order in for the new device.  My EVO is still using the same factory battery that came with it, with no noticeable decline in performance.  I get about a day out of one charge with moderate use in an area with pretty strong coverage.  Apparently, this is what I can expect with the new device, so I am not worried.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an OG EVO4G owner since launch day and have my pre-order in for the new device.  My EVO is still using the same factory battery that came with it, with no noticeable decline in performance.  I get about a day out of one charge with moderate use in an area with pretty strong coverage.  Apparently, this is what I can expect with the new device, so I am not worried.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arameth</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/#comment-210130</link>
		<dc:creator>Arameth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 10:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227839#comment-210130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Get a white case... problem solved.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get a white case&#8230; problem solved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesus Fernandez</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/#comment-210120</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Fernandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 07:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227839#comment-210120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The scores were lower because the screen resolution was 1280x720. The other HTC one phone that was tested with the S4 chip only had 960x540 meaning less pixels to push around so it would get you higher scores in benchmarks and such. Its still pretty impressive what 28nm technology can achieve in performance. HTC is heading the right way with this HTC one lineup.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The scores were lower because the screen resolution was 1280&#215;720. The other HTC one phone that was tested with the S4 chip only had 960&#215;540 meaning less pixels to push around so it would get you higher scores in benchmarks and such. Its still pretty impressive what 28nm technology can achieve in performance. HTC is heading the right way with this HTC one lineup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zak</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/#comment-210099</link>
		<dc:creator>Zak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 04:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227839#comment-210099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does the lack of a removable battery cause concern for people who&#039;ll keep this phone for the duration of the 2 year contract?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the lack of a removable battery cause concern for people who&#8217;ll keep this phone for the duration of the 2 year contract?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis B</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/#comment-210095</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 02:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227839#comment-210095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HTC is doing impressively this year !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HTC is doing impressively this year !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Pingley</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/#comment-210064</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Pingley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227839#comment-210064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally, a new Sprint device to be excited about. I love my iPhone 4S, but this One X certainly has my interest piqued.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, a new Sprint device to be excited about. I love my iPhone 4S, but this One X certainly has my interest piqued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfranco328</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/#comment-210052</link>
		<dc:creator>jfranco328</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227839#comment-210052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have an EVO 3d also and will be getting the new EVO when it launches. I would like to know how is the speaker quality of the EVO LTE? I hope it is much louder than the EVO 3D since I always use my cell phone when I need navigation....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an EVO 3d also and will be getting the new EVO when it launches. I would like to know how is the speaker quality of the EVO LTE? I hope it is much louder than the EVO 3D since I always use my cell phone when I need navigation&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/#comment-210030</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227839#comment-210030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[that sounds reasonable, but the battery was over 50% when i ran the tests. shouldn&#039;t be cut down at that point]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that sounds reasonable, but the battery was over 50% when i ran the tests. shouldn&#8217;t be cut down at that point</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/#comment-210031</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227839#comment-210031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YES.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevesize</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/#comment-210023</link>
		<dc:creator>stevesize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227839#comment-210023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So anybody think it would be worth getting rid of my EVO 3D for this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So anybody think it would be worth getting rid of my EVO 3D for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mykie242</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/#comment-210014</link>
		<dc:creator>mykie242</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 19:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227839#comment-210014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AT&amp;T is getting a black One X[L], any idea of Sprint will get a white EVO 4G LTE?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T is getting a black One X[L], any idea of Sprint will get a white EVO 4G LTE?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfranco328</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/#comment-209977</link>
		<dc:creator>jfranco328</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227839#comment-209977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder what the battery percentage was at when you ran your tests. Maybe the processor was running at a lower clock speed to conserve power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what the battery percentage was at when you ran your tests. Maybe the processor was running at a lower clock speed to conserve power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/#comment-209959</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227839#comment-209959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Strange, isn&#039;t it? We&#039;ll be continuing to investigate, as all other S4 benchmarks have shown much more massive results than this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange, isn&#8217;t it? We&#8217;ll be continuing to investigate, as all other S4 benchmarks have shown much more massive results than this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mars Gk</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/#comment-209948</link>
		<dc:creator>Mars Gk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 17:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227839#comment-209948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Benchmark score are strangely low though.  Quadrant should be around 5000 and Antutu over 10000.  Why is this one so slow?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Benchmark score are strangely low though.  Quadrant should be around 5000 and Antutu over 10000.  Why is this one so slow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feech</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/#comment-209944</link>
		<dc:creator>Feech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227839#comment-209944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s amazing to me how different websites can trash certain aspects of a handset but then agree on others.. Thanks Slashgear for giving me what I think is a unbiased opinion ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing to me how different websites can trash certain aspects of a handset but then agree on others.. Thanks Slashgear for giving me what I think is a unbiased opinion </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-review-11227839/#comment-209941</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227839#comment-209941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t forget about the dedicated camera button!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget about the dedicated camera button!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
