<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hivision Android netbook could be $149 [Video]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/hivision-android-netbook-could-be-149-video-1269574/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/hivision-android-netbook-could-be-149-video-1269574/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 23:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mkvhelp</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/hivision-android-netbook-could-be-149-video-1269574/#comment-83396</link>
		<dc:creator>mkvhelp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=69574#comment-83396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[honestly, it is just not as good as my macbook air :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>honestly, it is just not as good as my macbook air :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook User</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/hivision-android-netbook-could-be-149-video-1269574/#comment-61444</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=69574#comment-61444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it is the Samsung ARM9 533mhz, not Cortex A9, yet I have it right here and I am testing it, even though one would think ARM9 would make it slow, it browses the web nearly at full speed which is really awesome. I think Google has done some kind of magic to optimize the regular Android 1.5 web browser, where the Android 2.1 web browser is probably even better, and with upcoming support for Flash. I will post a video review of this laptop on my site showing the web browsing speed as soon as possible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is the Samsung ARM9 533mhz, not Cortex A9, yet I have it right here and I am testing it, even though one would think ARM9 would make it slow, it browses the web nearly at full speed which is really awesome. I think Google has done some kind of magic to optimize the regular Android 1.5 web browser, where the Android 2.1 web browser is probably even better, and with upcoming support for Flash. I will post a video review of this laptop on my site showing the web browsing speed as soon as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Rucker</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/hivision-android-netbook-could-be-149-video-1269574/#comment-61442</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Rucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=69574#comment-61442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Except in these $69-200 7&quot; ARM netbooks, there&#039;s three different families of ARM9 SoC being used - an Anyka ~200-266 MHz chip, a few Samsung ~400-533 MHz chips, and a Wondervision/VIA ~400-533 MHz chip.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except in these $69-200 7&#8243; ARM netbooks, there&#8217;s three different families of ARM9 SoC being used &#8211; an Anyka ~200-266 MHz chip, a few Samsung ~400-533 MHz chips, and a Wondervision/VIA ~400-533 MHz chip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sola</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/hivision-android-netbook-could-be-149-video-1269574/#comment-61425</link>
		<dc:creator>sola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=69574#comment-61425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The interviewed lady said ARM 9, not ARM Cortex A9.
 
It is possible, that she meant Cortex A9 because ARM9 processors are AGES OLD and unlikely to be put into a netbook]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interviewed lady said ARM 9, not ARM Cortex A9.</p>
<p>It is possible, that she meant Cortex A9 because ARM9 processors are AGES OLD and unlikely to be put into a netbook</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
