<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harman Kardon Brings 3D Compatible Receivers in Time for Summer Movie Season</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/harman-kardon-brings-3d-compatible-receivers-in-time-for-summer-movie-season-08158101/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/harman-kardon-brings-3d-compatible-receivers-in-time-for-summer-movie-season-08158101/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronbot</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/harman-kardon-brings-3d-compatible-receivers-in-time-for-summer-movie-season-08158101/#comment-136943</link>
		<dc:creator>ronbot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 01:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=158101#comment-136943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting to see a big jump in wattage on this new batch of HK receivers as they historically are very conservative with power ratings. The 1650 is basically double from before (95W vs 50W), but with less feature, such as 5.1 channel only and no network ability. The 2650 seems to provide the best value, especially that I just saw one in a BestBuy for only $699. I may have to replace my &#039;aging&#039; 247 with that. Good timing too as I almost went with an Onkyo but always preferred the sound of Harman Kardon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to see a big jump in wattage on this new batch of HK receivers as they historically are very conservative with power ratings. The 1650 is basically double from before (95W vs 50W), but with less feature, such as 5.1 channel only and no network ability. The 2650 seems to provide the best value, especially that I just saw one in a BestBuy for only $699. I may have to replace my &#8216;aging&#8217; 247 with that. Good timing too as I almost went with an Onkyo but always preferred the sound of Harman Kardon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lulzsec</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/harman-kardon-brings-3d-compatible-receivers-in-time-for-summer-movie-season-08158101/#comment-117260</link>
		<dc:creator>Lulzsec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 18:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=158101#comment-117260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slick, but out of my price range.

http://bit.ly/dI3hcF ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slick, but out of my price range.</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/dI3hcF" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dI3hcF</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lulzsec</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/harman-kardon-brings-3d-compatible-receivers-in-time-for-summer-movie-season-08158101/#comment-117261</link>
		<dc:creator>Lulzsec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 18:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=158101#comment-117261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slick, but out of my price range.

http://bit.ly/dI3hcF ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slick, but out of my price range.</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/dI3hcF" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dI3hcF</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
