<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google TV to daisy-chain existing set-top boxes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-tv-to-daisy-chain-existing-set-top-boxes-2679224/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-tv-to-daisy-chain-existing-set-top-boxes-2679224/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 02:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PressSelect</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-tv-to-daisy-chain-existing-set-top-boxes-2679224/#comment-62446</link>
		<dc:creator>PressSelect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=79224#comment-62446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not for nothin&#039;, but can&#039;t the smart folks at Google find a way to do interactive TV without saddling the home entertainment configuration with yet another device?  Why can&#039;t they follow the lead of companies like ActiveVideo Networks that are delivering interactivity to any set-top box or broadband-connected CE device?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not for nothin&#8217;, but can&#8217;t the smart folks at Google find a way to do interactive TV without saddling the home entertainment configuration with yet another device?  Why can&#8217;t they follow the lead of companies like ActiveVideo Networks that are delivering interactivity to any set-top box or broadband-connected CE device?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
