<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Nexus One gets official [Video]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-nexus-one-gets-official-video-0567760/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-nexus-one-gets-official-video-0567760/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 15:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook User</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-nexus-one-gets-official-video-0567760/#comment-61319</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=67760#comment-61319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is moving down in the stack to challenge B2C opponents with an open architecture and new sets of standards. In creating a post-revenue business model, Google can only manage success if consumers accept a co-branding and outsourced manufactured device ... NQ Logic recommends reading about the rest of the new Google&#039;s mobile strategy at www.nqlogic.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is moving down in the stack to challenge B2C opponents with an open architecture and new sets of standards. In creating a post-revenue business model, Google can only manage success if consumers accept a co-branding and outsourced manufactured device &#8230; NQ Logic recommends reading about the rest of the new Google&#8217;s mobile strategy at <a href="http://www.nqlogic.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nqlogic.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arasmus</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-nexus-one-gets-official-video-0567760/#comment-61306</link>
		<dc:creator>Arasmus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=67760#comment-61306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went immediately from coverage of the Nexus One event to T-Mobile. First the details of that and then an impression. The details from T-Mobile are that they are only allowing existing customers to upgrade to the Nexus One after the 22nd month of their existing contract. Not sure that&#039;s such a cleaver move by T-Mobile because at least for many G1 users that puts them up for renewal at a time when Verizon and other carriers will also be offering the Nexus One. For those anticipating porting their number to Google Voice and getting a data-only plan, at present T-Mobile does not have a data-only plan according to their representative and so you would have to pay at least $39 for voice and $24.99 for data ($64 total).

More interestingly, when I talked to T-Mobile they told me that they were unable to access the purchasing process on the Google phone site. One account specialist told me that if T-Mobile had been offering the phone, they might have been able to give me a break on the 22 month contract stipulation, but as Google was offering it they could not. You can interpret that as self-serving, but I came away with an additional impression. The Google &quot;phone-store&quot; is about Google inserting itself in the customer relationship. Rubin during the press conference said pointedly, the relationship will be between the customer and Google. I think that&#039;s telling. I think it points to (1) a Google Voice disintermediation strategy (no surprise there) but also (2) a Google Checkout strategy. If Google now has a payment processing relationship with me, then it has all the necessary components for a mobile payment system. The telecos, that are increasingly finding themselves backed into the corner of being a commodity provider, see their payment processing systems as the family-silver. Google is going straight for that. Today that seems more clear to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went immediately from coverage of the Nexus One event to T-Mobile. First the details of that and then an impression. The details from T-Mobile are that they are only allowing existing customers to upgrade to the Nexus One after the 22nd month of their existing contract. Not sure that&#8217;s such a cleaver move by T-Mobile because at least for many G1 users that puts them up for renewal at a time when Verizon and other carriers will also be offering the Nexus One. For those anticipating porting their number to Google Voice and getting a data-only plan, at present T-Mobile does not have a data-only plan according to their representative and so you would have to pay at least $39 for voice and $24.99 for data ($64 total).</p>
<p>More interestingly, when I talked to T-Mobile they told me that they were unable to access the purchasing process on the Google phone site. One account specialist told me that if T-Mobile had been offering the phone, they might have been able to give me a break on the 22 month contract stipulation, but as Google was offering it they could not. You can interpret that as self-serving, but I came away with an additional impression. The Google &#8220;phone-store&#8221; is about Google inserting itself in the customer relationship. Rubin during the press conference said pointedly, the relationship will be between the customer and Google. I think that&#8217;s telling. I think it points to (1) a Google Voice disintermediation strategy (no surprise there) but also (2) a Google Checkout strategy. If Google now has a payment processing relationship with me, then it has all the necessary components for a mobile payment system. The telecos, that are increasingly finding themselves backed into the corner of being a commodity provider, see their payment processing systems as the family-silver. Google is going straight for that. Today that seems more clear to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
