<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google: Microsoft grandstanding over web privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-microsoft-grandstanding-over-web-privacy-21214495/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-microsoft-grandstanding-over-web-privacy-21214495/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 18:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gmaninvan</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-microsoft-grandstanding-over-web-privacy-21214495/#comment-186273</link>
		<dc:creator>gmaninvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=214495#comment-186273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More MS slander on google.....shocker. They seem to attack everything else, why not add this to the list. If 11000 other sites do it, why don&#039;t you mention that MS?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More MS slander on google&#8230;..shocker. They seem to attack everything else, why not add this to the list. If 11000 other sites do it, why don&#8217;t you mention that MS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Grace</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-microsoft-grandstanding-over-web-privacy-21214495/#comment-186158</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=214495#comment-186158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How does defending policies and practices that are under direct assault qualify as &quot;grandstanding&quot;. Microsoft&#039;s accusation of a rival companies ethics at least deserves a rebuttal. I know that both companies in the technological arena tread boldly into an area where ethical boundaries are still being defined, but at the least the columnist might attempt some objectivity. Journalistic ethical practices have been clearly defined, even if seldom adhered to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does defending policies and practices that are under direct assault qualify as &#8220;grandstanding&#8221;. Microsoft&#8217;s accusation of a rival companies ethics at least deserves a rebuttal. I know that both companies in the technological arena tread boldly into an area where ethical boundaries are still being defined, but at the least the columnist might attempt some objectivity. Journalistic ethical practices have been clearly defined, even if seldom adhered to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
