Comments on: Google may replace .com in the near future http://www.slashgear.com/google-may-replace-com-in-the-near-future-12222731/ Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions Thu, 10 May 2012 13:34:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: AM Infosystems http://www.slashgear.com/google-may-replace-com-in-the-near-future-12222731/#comment-202209 AM Infosystems Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:24:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222731#comment-202209 What ever the changes google reffer that shoud be simple as it now,because it helps people to find easily what they search. Example:-.mail,.play etc

]]> By: AM Infosystems http://www.slashgear.com/google-may-replace-com-in-the-near-future-12222731/#comment-202210 AM Infosystems Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:24:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222731#comment-202210 What ever the changes google reffer that shoud be simple as it now,because it helps people to find easily what they search. Example:-.mail,.play etc

]]> By: JohnJohnJ http://www.slashgear.com/google-may-replace-com-in-the-near-future-12222731/#comment-202187 JohnJohnJ Fri, 13 Apr 2012 05:13:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222731#comment-202187 Author, what makes you think Google purchased these domains for reasons other than defensive purposes? Do you really think Google’s .com is going away?

]]> By: thelicoriceman http://www.slashgear.com/google-may-replace-com-in-the-near-future-12222731/#comment-202167 thelicoriceman Fri, 13 Apr 2012 02:08:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222731#comment-202167 google.play

you.tube
goog.le
g.mail
 that would get confusing. Google may keep it simple like:
gmail.google
play.google
youtube.google

]]> By: jhdale http://www.slashgear.com/google-may-replace-com-in-the-near-future-12222731/#comment-202158 jhdale Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:48:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222731#comment-202158 .go isn’t taken, but in general two-letter domains are supposed to be countries. Three or more letters for general-purpose domains. I agree with you that spelling out Google would be ridiculous, they will want something short and simple. They already use .gl for their URL-shortener (even though it is supposed to mean Greenland).

My guesses would be .goog or .ggl.

But if they could skirt the rules and get away with .go or even .g, I’m sure they would jump at the chance.

]]> By: droidment http://www.slashgear.com/google-may-replace-com-in-the-near-future-12222731/#comment-202148 droidment Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:55:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222731#comment-202148 Or it would just be translate.google and search.google

]]> By: Chris Yao http://www.slashgear.com/google-may-replace-com-in-the-near-future-12222731/#comment-202145 Chris Yao Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:46:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222731#comment-202145 Would be more like
http://www.google
http://www.search.google
http://www.translate.google

]]> By: DaymonH http://www.slashgear.com/google-may-replace-com-in-the-near-future-12222731/#comment-202146 DaymonH Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:46:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222731#comment-202146 Someone over at Google has lost their pea pickin mind, and I’m not just talking about this story.

]]> By: James1 http://www.slashgear.com/google-may-replace-com-in-the-near-future-12222731/#comment-202143 James1 Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:35:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222731#comment-202143 so what, it would be like http://www.google.google?

]]> By: Vincent Nguyen http://www.slashgear.com/google-may-replace-com-in-the-near-future-12222731/#comment-202139 Vincent Nguyen Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:56:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222731#comment-202139 .go is my vote

]]> By: Vincent Nguyen http://www.slashgear.com/google-may-replace-com-in-the-near-future-12222731/#comment-202140 Vincent Nguyen Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:56:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222731#comment-202140 .go is my vote

]]>