<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google driverless cars still require double drivers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-driverless-cars-still-require-double-drivers-08226769/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-driverless-cars-still-require-double-drivers-08226769/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 02:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Gee</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-driverless-cars-still-require-double-drivers-08226769/#comment-209207</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Gee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=226769#comment-209207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bring it on!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring it on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosdi</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-driverless-cars-still-require-double-drivers-08226769/#comment-209203</link>
		<dc:creator>rosdi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=226769#comment-209203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally... I can text while (the car  is) driving... yeah!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally&#8230; I can text while (the car  is) driving&#8230; yeah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-driverless-cars-still-require-double-drivers-08226769/#comment-209201</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=226769#comment-209201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you are correct, the NV regulation requiring 2 occupants is only for the &quot;testing&quot; phase. Once the AI is proven the &quot;driver&quot; is the person who engages the program and doesn&#039;t have to be in the vehicle.
Section 4 &quot;If
the certificate of compliance certifies that the autonomous vehicle is capable
of being operated in autonomous mode without the physical presence of the
operator in the vehicle, the person may operate the vehicle in this State
without being physically present in the autonomous vehicle.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are correct, the NV regulation requiring 2 occupants is only for the &#8220;testing&#8221; phase. Once the AI is proven the &#8220;driver&#8221; is the person who engages the program and doesn&#8217;t have to be in the vehicle.<br />
Section 4 &#8220;If<br />
the certificate of compliance certifies that the autonomous vehicle is capable<br />
of being operated in autonomous mode without the physical presence of the<br />
operator in the vehicle, the person may operate the vehicle in this State<br />
without being physically present in the autonomous vehicle.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raul Mihali</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-driverless-cars-still-require-double-drivers-08226769/#comment-209198</link>
		<dc:creator>Raul Mihali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 14:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=226769#comment-209198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hmm, you sure? I thought that the &quot;2 people&quot; regulation is to be applied for any new company wishing to venture in the research of self driving cars, but not to the &quot;proven&quot; ones. I could be wrong and I&#039;d find it a joke that you&#039;d need two people in a car that can finally drive itself in addition to allowing the usual manned control.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm, you sure? I thought that the &#8220;2 people&#8221; regulation is to be applied for any new company wishing to venture in the research of self driving cars, but not to the &#8220;proven&#8221; ones. I could be wrong and I&#8217;d find it a joke that you&#8217;d need two people in a car that can finally drive itself in addition to allowing the usual manned control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dankilpatrick</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-driverless-cars-still-require-double-drivers-08226769/#comment-209193</link>
		<dc:creator>Dankilpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 14:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=226769#comment-209193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Small steps, all in time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small steps, all in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asdf</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-driverless-cars-still-require-double-drivers-08226769/#comment-209190</link>
		<dc:creator>Asdf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=226769#comment-209190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[finally]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>finally</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
