<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Docs Adds Social Element, Gets Updated With Discussion Feature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-docs-adds-social-element-gets-updated-with-discussion-feature-16140468/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-docs-adds-social-element-gets-updated-with-discussion-feature-16140468/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Byrne</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-docs-adds-social-element-gets-updated-with-discussion-feature-16140468/#comment-100324</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Byrne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=140468#comment-100324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that wave didn&#039;t have an intended use case or audience.

But the structured discussion is a massive trend we&#039;re seeing and working to expand at www.outline.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that wave didn&#8217;t have an intended use case or audience.</p>
<p>But the structured discussion is a massive trend we&#8217;re seeing and working to expand at <a href="http://www.outline.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.outline.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Butler</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-docs-adds-social-element-gets-updated-with-discussion-feature-16140468/#comment-100263</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=140468#comment-100263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So they&#039;re cannibalising the defunct Wave into their existing product base (real time multi-person edits, sidechat, etc)...  nice.

No, really, it is.  Nobody knew what Wave was for, but it sure as hell had a lot of nice features.  If they can reincorporate those features into products that have a definition already, I think it&#039;s good news for everybody.  And who knows, if users start to get the hang of Wave-like features, maybe it could pave the way for a rebirth of the full Wave product.

I reckon we&#039;ll be seeing quite a few Wave-ish features cropping up across el goog&#039;s product base over the next wee while.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So they&#8217;re cannibalising the defunct Wave into their existing product base (real time multi-person edits, sidechat, etc)&#8230;  nice.</p>
<p>No, really, it is.  Nobody knew what Wave was for, but it sure as hell had a lot of nice features.  If they can reincorporate those features into products that have a definition already, I think it&#8217;s good news for everybody.  And who knows, if users start to get the hang of Wave-like features, maybe it could pave the way for a rebirth of the full Wave product.</p>
<p>I reckon we&#8217;ll be seeing quite a few Wave-ish features cropping up across el goog&#8217;s product base over the next wee while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
