<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google confirms no affiliation with Carrier IQ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 18:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naram Moshe</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-159915</link>
		<dc:creator>Naram Moshe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-159915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[None on my Nexus S thankfully.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>None on my Nexus S thankfully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-159660</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 02:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-159660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has no affiliation with CarrierIQ.  Given Google&#039;s track record I wonder if that&#039;s because they have their own &quot;open-source&quot; software that does the same thing?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has no affiliation with CarrierIQ.  Given Google&#8217;s track record I wonder if that&#8217;s because they have their own &#8220;open-source&#8221; software that does the same thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-159659</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 01:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-159659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Relax Moron I have been on the XDA forums for years. And some of us don&#039;t just use we write. On some Samsungs its known as Keytracer, Im just wondering If Goog named it something else.

Google all the way, Android rules.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Relax Moron I have been on the XDA forums for years. And some of us don&#8217;t just use we write. On some Samsungs its known as Keytracer, Im just wondering If Goog named it something else.</p>
<p>Google all the way, Android rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Woods</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-159649</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-159649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course it didn&#039;t, moron. Carrier IQ is added by manufacturers and carriers. It is not part of the Android OS. Those of us who root our phones and use stuff like cyanogenmod (which is more or less pure android + some modifications) just kinda shrugged when we heard about CIQ, because roms like MikG, Cyanogenmod, MIUI, don&#039;t have any of that carrier specific BS.

You love to hate google, well, try again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it didn&#8217;t, moron. Carrier IQ is added by manufacturers and carriers. It is not part of the Android OS. Those of us who root our phones and use stuff like cyanogenmod (which is more or less pure android + some modifications) just kinda shrugged when we heard about CIQ, because roms like MikG, Cyanogenmod, MIUI, don&#8217;t have any of that carrier specific BS.</p>
<p>You love to hate google, well, try again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roarshack</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-159162</link>
		<dc:creator>Roarshack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 02:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-159162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*crickets*]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*crickets*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-159123</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 00:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-159123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have an offtopic question for the moderators of this site.  

Do Posts with links in them do not get published?  I ask because I submitted a Post over 18 hours ago with a very detailed write up of what I think might of happened around this Carrier IQ business and it has been in the &quot;waiting to be approved by moderator&quot; state since then.  The Post had links to all my reference material.

Could a moderator please review it?  Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an offtopic question for the moderators of this site.  </p>
<p>Do Posts with links in them do not get published?  I ask because I submitted a Post over 18 hours ago with a very detailed write up of what I think might of happened around this Carrier IQ business and it has been in the &#8220;waiting to be approved by moderator&#8221; state since then.  The Post had links to all my reference material.</p>
<p>Could a moderator please review it?  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Dellinger</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-159119</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Dellinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-159119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sheesh, it feels like this has become an issue because some Google-hating folks thought it was an Android issue and jumped at the chance to try and undermine Google. But now that it is clear that it is not an Android issue (in fact Apple admits to having on their iDevices) it will settle down and be swept under the rug.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sheesh, it feels like this has become an issue because some Google-hating folks thought it was an Android issue and jumped at the chance to try and undermine Google. But now that it is clear that it is not an Android issue (in fact Apple admits to having on their iDevices) it will settle down and be swept under the rug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Ojeda</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-159116</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Ojeda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 00:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-159116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Come on give the Chinaman a break (unless Fang is a Celtic name of some sort?). English is obviously not his first language. At least he didn&#039;t use &quot;noone&quot; as a word. However he did use &quot;it&#039;s&quot; instead of &quot;its&quot; for the possessive form, which is another fairly common grammatical mistake.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on give the Chinaman a break (unless Fang is a Celtic name of some sort?). English is obviously not his first language. At least he didn&#8217;t use &#8220;noone&#8221; as a word. However he did use &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; instead of &#8220;its&#8221; for the possessive form, which is another fairly common grammatical mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-159080</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-159080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually a good way to find out if Google had any dealings with Carrier IQ would be to see if there original Nexus one had it installed. The Nexus one was carrier independent, and it had pure Android on it. So if the Nexus one had it installed well then, mmmmmmm shame on you Google. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually a good way to find out if Google had any dealings with Carrier IQ would be to see if there original Nexus one had it installed. The Nexus one was carrier independent, and it had pure Android on it. So if the Nexus one had it installed well then, mmmmmmm shame on you Google. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-159079</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-159079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would hope not Google, remember don&#039;t be evil.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would hope not Google, remember don&#8217;t be evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roarshack</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-159016</link>
		<dc:creator>Roarshack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-159016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Links showing rootkit running and keylogging on iPhones ? Something get discovered last night?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Links showing rootkit running and keylogging on iPhones ? Something get discovered last night?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-159008</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 18:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-159008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They guy who discovered it found it on a SIM free handset he bought for development.  It was still reporting in using his WIFI.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They guy who discovered it found it on a SIM free handset he bought for development.  It was still reporting in using his WIFI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158982</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry to inform you, But that&#039;s not CIQ you are opting out of. That&#039;s the basic usage info that Apple collects to use to help better and improve iOS.
Google asks you to agree/disagree to the same thing when you first set up your phone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to inform you, But that&#8217;s not CIQ you are opting out of. That&#8217;s the basic usage info that Apple collects to use to help better and improve iOS.<br />
Google asks you to agree/disagree to the same thing when you first set up your phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158975</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You didn&#039;t turn off CIQ, you turned off Apple&#039;s way to collect info to help better fix iOS problems that might pop up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You didn&#8217;t turn off CIQ, you turned off Apple&#8217;s way to collect info to help better fix iOS problems that might pop up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Agee</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158960</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Agee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a Verizon Droid X with the Simply Stunning rom, and Voodoo Carrier IQ (available in the Market) said I don&#039;t have Carrier IQ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Verizon Droid X with the Simply Stunning rom, and Voodoo Carrier IQ (available in the Market) said I don&#8217;t have Carrier IQ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Stovall</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158959</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Stovall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No IQ on my Moto Droid X2 on Verizon in USA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No IQ on my Moto Droid X2 on Verizon in USA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158952</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not so fast there Roarshack.  iPhones DO have it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so fast there Roarshack.  iPhones DO have it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158894</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#039;t noticed it so far, but I&#039;ll peek on Titanium later to make sure there&#039;s no way I&#039;m going to be finding it if it is there. (Verizon Moto Droid)

Though the entire issue is stupid. You&#039;d think they can track performance on their side, and if they did need to track from user devices, it would be an opt-in AND designed by them so they can&#039;t get any backfire from another company tracking a whole bunch of stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t noticed it so far, but I&#8217;ll peek on Titanium later to make sure there&#8217;s no way I&#8217;m going to be finding it if it is there. (Verizon Moto Droid)</p>
<p>Though the entire issue is stupid. You&#8217;d think they can track performance on their side, and if they did need to track from user devices, it would be an opt-in AND designed by them so they can&#8217;t get any backfire from another company tracking a whole bunch of stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158868</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 11:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that profiling tools can hook in and get enormous amounts of activity data, but I&#039;m not aware of any hidden profiling tools installed by default on millions of smart phones.

I guarantee that data is indeed stored on the local disk.  In the training video labeled “device to packages to metrics” you see an “Upload Reason” column in the data grid. Some of the entries are labeled as “Archive Full”.  What this implies is that the application records and archives some amount of data when in an offline mode, meaning no cell tower coverage.  It then pushes the data across the wire when the archive is full and the device has cell phone coverage again.

It would be a worthless product if they were incapable of reporting crashes while you didn’t have cell phone coverage, thus the reason why they have to archive it.  This is standard practice for mobile applications, log locally when out of range.  Any decent mobile app has to expect that there will not be cell phone coverage 24x7 so you must log locally until you get coverage again.

Can I prove they log locally while not having cell coverage? No, but just imagine the scenario that your phone crashes under this hypothetic condition of 1) you are not in cell range 2) you start some app, ie Netflix.  How would the service providers, Carrier IQ&#039;s customer, ever know that this condition causes problems if Carrier IQ isn’t logging to disk when out of coverage?  Isn’t the whole point of the product to track and report problems?
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that profiling tools can hook in and get enormous amounts of activity data, but I&#8217;m not aware of any hidden profiling tools installed by default on millions of smart phones.</p>
<p>I guarantee that data is indeed stored on the local disk.  In the training video labeled “device to packages to metrics” you see an “Upload Reason” column in the data grid. Some of the entries are labeled as “Archive Full”.  What this implies is that the application records and archives some amount of data when in an offline mode, meaning no cell tower coverage.  It then pushes the data across the wire when the archive is full and the device has cell phone coverage again.</p>
<p>It would be a worthless product if they were incapable of reporting crashes while you didn’t have cell phone coverage, thus the reason why they have to archive it.  This is standard practice for mobile applications, log locally when out of range.  Any decent mobile app has to expect that there will not be cell phone coverage 24&#215;7 so you must log locally until you get coverage again.</p>
<p>Can I prove they log locally while not having cell coverage? No, but just imagine the scenario that your phone crashes under this hypothetic condition of 1) you are not in cell range 2) you start some app, ie Netflix.  How would the service providers, Carrier IQ&#8217;s customer, ever know that this condition causes problems if Carrier IQ isn’t logging to disk when out of coverage?  Isn’t the whole point of the product to track and report problems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158863</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 11:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not concerned about the data being sent somewhere, I&#039;m concerned that it is actually on the wire in the first place.  You can bet your bottom dollar someone is out there sniffing routers, wifi access points, etc for any traffic headed to a domain owned by Carrier IQ.  

The training videos, I think produced outside of the US, clearly show a date of 2007 and 2009 so this has been out in the wild for quite some time and has given hackers plenty of time to do their deeds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not concerned about the data being sent somewhere, I&#8217;m concerned that it is actually on the wire in the first place.  You can bet your bottom dollar someone is out there sniffing routers, wifi access points, etc for any traffic headed to a domain owned by Carrier IQ.  </p>
<p>The training videos, I think produced outside of the US, clearly show a date of 2007 and 2009 so this has been out in the wild for quite some time and has given hackers plenty of time to do their deeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Softester23</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158861</link>
		<dc:creator>Softester23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 10:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly! 
For example, program profiling tools can intercept any  procedure call, instrument code, see the arguments (keystrokes, or location, numbers, whatever), aggregate execution time. This is not a privacy or security breach while data is in local non-persistent memory. As &quot;No&quot; said, try to find if any sensitive data goes outside through network, or at least stored on the local disk. Youtube video did not show anything like that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly! <br />
For example, program profiling tools can intercept any  procedure call, instrument code, see the arguments (keystrokes, or location, numbers, whatever), aggregate execution time. This is not a privacy or security breach while data is in local non-persistent memory. As &#8220;No&#8221; said, try to find if any sensitive data goes outside through network, or at least stored on the local disk. Youtube video did not show anything like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Sauntry</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158847</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Sauntry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 09:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No IQ on my Sensation XE on Vodafone in UK]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No IQ on my Sensation XE on Vodafone in UK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xxaamm</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158835</link>
		<dc:creator>Xxaamm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Is there any other similar program behave like Carrier IQ&#039;s program? Read carefully the statement of the carrier/manufacturer/OS. Maybe they do not use Carrier IQ&#039;s program, but they use similar program to collect user data without consent and cannot be disable. This carrier/manufacturer/OS should GO TO HELL.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any other similar program behave like Carrier IQ&#8217;s program? Read carefully the statement of the carrier/manufacturer/OS. Maybe they do not use Carrier IQ&#8217;s program, but they use similar program to collect user data without consent and cannot be disable. This carrier/manufacturer/OS should GO TO HELL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158831</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 07:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, just buy your handset sim-free. Easy.

As stated in the article above (and many others), this is software that is loaded on by the carriers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, just buy your handset sim-free. Easy.</p>
<p>As stated in the article above (and many others), this is software that is loaded on by the carriers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roarshack</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158830</link>
		<dc:creator>Roarshack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 07:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[iPhones don&#039;t have a rootkit running. No keylogging apparently going on.Youre asked if you want to have the network diagnostics turned on when you set up your phone and there&#039;s an off button if you want to turn it off. 
Have fun dinking with your android
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iPhones don&#8217;t have a rootkit running. No keylogging apparently going on.Youre asked if you want to have the network diagnostics turned on when you set up your phone and there&#8217;s an off button if you want to turn it off.<br />
Have fun dinking with your android</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: desireedee33</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158827</link>
		<dc:creator>desireedee33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 07:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carrier IQ&#039;s immediate response to this revelation  was to threaten the guy who figured it out with legal action. What slime!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carrier IQ&#8217;s immediate response to this revelation  was to threaten the guy who figured it out with legal action. What slime!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158826</link>
		<dc:creator>No</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 07:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Since each key press is recorded and sent instantly over a non-secure channel as shown in the video, no https, no handshaking, etc..., this means all it takes is one compromised router to sniff out this information and send it to the &quot;bad guys&quot;&quot;

The video shows keypresses being logged to a verbose logcat over a USB cord in debug mode. That&#039;s not even close to sending every key press over a non-secure channel.

It&#039;s shocking how poorly the media is covering this. There may be a key logger here. Carrier IQ may be stealing all your text messages and saving them somewhere. Or maybe not. Setting up an event handler that verbosely logs events isn&#039;t a great programming practice, but it&#039;s neither a rootkit nor a keylogger. Your keys are logged in multiple places throughout every single operating system, sometimes from the os, sometimes a third party module compiled in (carrier IQ). That&#039;s just the way operating systems work. Normally, the keys are not logged verbosely, but it&#039;s hard to call that a vulnerability as you need to put the phone in debug mode and connect a usb cable to it to even see that data.

However, my guess is that they aren&#039;t because it wouldn&#039;t be that hard to really test what data is being logged and what is being sent home. You can simply run the phone for a while, and then inspect the phones harddrives for Carrier IQ&#039;s file and run a network packet capture program to capture all the data being sent from your phone (over wifi, it&#039;s a little trickier over the cell network, but probably possible). The fact that no one has been able to do this yet and the second video still didn&#039;t actually prove anything, sort of implies to me that there really is nothing that sinister going on her. Your mileage may vary.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Since each key press is recorded and sent instantly over a non-secure channel as shown in the video, no https, no handshaking, etc&#8230;, this means all it takes is one compromised router to sniff out this information and send it to the &#8220;bad guys&#8221;"</p>
<p>The video shows keypresses being logged to a verbose logcat over a USB cord in debug mode. That&#8217;s not even close to sending every key press over a non-secure channel.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s shocking how poorly the media is covering this. There may be a key logger here. Carrier IQ may be stealing all your text messages and saving them somewhere. Or maybe not. Setting up an event handler that verbosely logs events isn&#8217;t a great programming practice, but it&#8217;s neither a rootkit nor a keylogger. Your keys are logged in multiple places throughout every single operating system, sometimes from the os, sometimes a third party module compiled in (carrier IQ). That&#8217;s just the way operating systems work. Normally, the keys are not logged verbosely, but it&#8217;s hard to call that a vulnerability as you need to put the phone in debug mode and connect a usb cable to it to even see that data.</p>
<p>However, my guess is that they aren&#8217;t because it wouldn&#8217;t be that hard to really test what data is being logged and what is being sent home. You can simply run the phone for a while, and then inspect the phones harddrives for Carrier IQ&#8217;s file and run a network packet capture program to capture all the data being sent from your phone (over wifi, it&#8217;s a little trickier over the cell network, but probably possible). The fact that no one has been able to do this yet and the second video still didn&#8217;t actually prove anything, sort of implies to me that there really is nothing that sinister going on her. Your mileage may vary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158824</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 07:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is Nokia&#039;s name dragged through this CarrierIQ dirt? If there is indeed evidence, show it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is Nokia&#8217;s name dragged through this CarrierIQ dirt? If there is indeed evidence, show it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Brannies</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158816</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Brannies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 06:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No IQ software on my Nexus One.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No IQ software on my Nexus One.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158815</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 06:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why would they build the software to collect all these various forms of data if they, or the carriers, or the OEMs didn&#039;t intend to use it? And exactly who developed the specs for this software; was it done at the request of the OEMs or the carriers or was it driven by what Carrier IQ wanted to gather. 

And why so secretive? Why not make it a visible opt in? I&#039;ve turned off the Diagnostics and Usage option on my iphone, thereby shutting it off, but apparently the option to do so is not available to Android and RIM users.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would they build the software to collect all these various forms of data if they, or the carriers, or the OEMs didn&#8217;t intend to use it? And exactly who developed the specs for this software; was it done at the request of the OEMs or the carriers or was it driven by what Carrier IQ wanted to gather. </p>
<p>And why so secretive? Why not make it a visible opt in? I&#8217;ve turned off the Diagnostics and Usage option on my iphone, thereby shutting it off, but apparently the option to do so is not available to Android and RIM users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legally Loaded</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158796</link>
		<dc:creator>Legally Loaded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 05:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I access my bank account via my HTC Evo 3D via a secure connection and wi-fi. It appears that my password key-presses are being sent to Carrier IQ. I am pissed!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I access my bank account via my HTC Evo 3D via a secure connection and wi-fi. It appears that my password key-presses are being sent to Carrier IQ. I am pissed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Emery</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158795</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Emery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 05:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suspect most readers find this type of software disgusting. We know how to get around this type of thing, but how many of our friends and loved ones don&#039;t have a clue? Why should they? They don&#039;t expect a toaster to bite them in the butt. I applaud the guys that expose this crap when they find it..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect most readers find this type of software disgusting. We know how to get around this type of thing, but how many of our friends and loved ones don&#8217;t have a clue? Why should they? They don&#8217;t expect a toaster to bite them in the butt. I applaud the guys that expose this crap when they find it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari Asulin</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158793</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari Asulin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 05:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Buy android phones. Root. Put Cyanogenmod on them. 100% free open source software built by people like us. No more rootkit :)
Thank goodness for Android

Iphone users? eh, good luck with the jailbreak]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buy android phones. Root. Put Cyanogenmod on them. 100% free open source software built by people like us. No more rootkit :)<br />
Thank goodness for Android</p>
<p>Iphone users? eh, good luck with the jailbreak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Circle_ends2</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158790</link>
		<dc:creator>Circle_ends2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 05:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you write news/blogs for a living then you should improve your English. Seems like you have a problem with tenses. &quot;do not included the software&quot; is incorrect, as is &quot;this is essentially Google officially distanced itself.&quot; The proper way to write it would be &quot;do not include the software&quot; and &quot;this is essentially Google officially distancing itself.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you write news/blogs for a living then you should improve your English. Seems like you have a problem with tenses. &#8220;do not included the software&#8221; is incorrect, as is &#8220;this is essentially Google officially distanced itself.&#8221; The proper way to write it would be &#8220;do not include the software&#8221; and &#8220;this is essentially Google officially distancing itself.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GuestIthoughtyousaid?</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158789</link>
		<dc:creator>GuestIthoughtyousaid?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 05:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where did you see the information being transmitted to someone?!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did you see the information being transmitted to someone?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Emery</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158787</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Emery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 05:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A program. Your phone was shipped with it and it runs in the background. Supposed to help the carrier to better manage load on their systems, but happens to collect way too much info. Where and how that info is used..you.. nor the rest of us know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A program. Your phone was shipped with it and it runs in the background. Supposed to help the carrier to better manage load on their systems, but happens to collect way too much info. Where and how that info is used..you.. nor the rest of us know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mksm2000</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158786</link>
		<dc:creator>Mksm2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 05:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what exactly is the HTC agentIQ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what exactly is the HTC agentIQ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Emery</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158784</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Emery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 04:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When will the idiots start to understand that it is the imbedded systems that are the greatest risk. This is just another instance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will the idiots start to understand that it is the imbedded systems that are the greatest risk. This is just another instance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: old brokenlink</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158781</link>
		<dc:creator>old brokenlink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 04:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cybersecyrutyofx
 re: military/government/corporate espionage hole

i hope the government / military looks into this

this could be a big national security hole

even if unintentional

someone really has to look at what this thing can do and how other can exploit this hole.

this is my biggest concern. when i first read about it and saw the video, i though omg, all the very sensitive stuff being transmitted and this looks like a hole that can be exploited by hackers or worse.

i was so concern that i wrote a letter to my senator and send him all the details i could find

think about it law enforcement, lawyers, judges, prodectors, local, state, federal government officials and staff, military officials from the highest rank down to the lowest, heads of corporations. all use cell phones and pass some very sensitive and important communications

think about something like troops being called up and deployed and moved around and all of it going over phone calls over cell phones and this software eavesdropping on the communications

perhaps the company is honestly not transmitting it or storing it or using it, but why have software that can that perhaps hackers or worse can exploit.

i can understand if i had called my carrier with a problem or they saw a problem on the network they could activate this sort of stuff or law enforcement, but all the time, down to the keystroke, getting request / response, messages, ect, regardless of wheter its currently transmitted, stored and used.

and no opt out, way to uninstall but to root the device and void the warrenty and done clandestinely
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cybersecyrutyofx<br />
 re: military/government/corporate espionage hole</p>
<p>i hope the government / military looks into this</p>
<p>this could be a big national security hole</p>
<p>even if unintentional</p>
<p>someone really has to look at what this thing can do and how other can exploit this hole.</p>
<p>this is my biggest concern. when i first read about it and saw the video, i though omg, all the very sensitive stuff being transmitted and this looks like a hole that can be exploited by hackers or worse.</p>
<p>i was so concern that i wrote a letter to my senator and send him all the details i could find</p>
<p>think about it law enforcement, lawyers, judges, prodectors, local, state, federal government officials and staff, military officials from the highest rank down to the lowest, heads of corporations. all use cell phones and pass some very sensitive and important communications</p>
<p>think about something like troops being called up and deployed and moved around and all of it going over phone calls over cell phones and this software eavesdropping on the communications</p>
<p>perhaps the company is honestly not transmitting it or storing it or using it, but why have software that can that perhaps hackers or worse can exploit.</p>
<p>i can understand if i had called my carrier with a problem or they saw a problem on the network they could activate this sort of stuff or law enforcement, but all the time, down to the keystroke, getting request / response, messages, ect, regardless of wheter its currently transmitted, stored and used.</p>
<p>and no opt out, way to uninstall but to root the device and void the warrenty and done clandestinely</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Abraham</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/google-confirms-no-affiliation-with-carrier-iq-01199471/#comment-158777</link>
		<dc:creator>David Abraham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 04:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=199471#comment-158777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course privacy and information security are dead]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course privacy and information security are dead</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
