Comments on: Google Android Siri opponent codename Majel, aka Star Trek Computer

By: adrian

adrian — Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:11:00 +0000

iphone boys think apple was the first to use this when in fact it was an old technology.

By: adrian

adrian — Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:11:00 +0000

iphone boys think apple was the first to use this when in fact it was an old technology.

By: Rob Talbott

Rob Talbott — Mon, 02 Jan 2012 05:36:00 +0000

Errrr you mean on the “LEFT” star trek computer??

By: Dulshan Kalpage

Dulshan Kalpage — Sun, 01 Jan 2012 07:46:00 +0000

Google X? Google’s definitely going for the kill this time

By: mark

mark — Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:33:00 +0000

all i can say is gene Roddenberry was are Leonardo of the 20th century and most
of the stuff on star trek is coming true as science fact and i think that so cool :)

By: plunder

plunder — Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:24:00 +0000

I just wish more national legal systems would tell the big Apple to sod off, or beat them in the market. “Reality Distortion Field” is right.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:50:00 +0000

The pilot of ST:TNG didn’t have Majel Roddenberries voice though…

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:32:00 +0000

You would never get me out of there.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:52:00 +0000

Will they copy her engrams?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 15 Dec 2011 03:18:00 +0000

Lol
And why is that???
Android has already Speaktoit that beats Siri all the way. No doubt about it.
And Speaktoit is long before Siri.
I think iboys invented this “news” to show how important is the stupit Siri and how Google copy it :)

By: Blackstar _

Blackstar _ — Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:19:00 +0000

Have to be honest, I really HATED her ‘computer’ voice for Star Trek. Judy Durand the Cardassian computer was far better on the ears.

By: plunder

plunder — Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:23:00 +0000

Funny how a talking computer seems “normal” to me now. O well . . . I’m off the the Holodeck. That would be cool.

By: Mervinbroad

Mervinbroad — Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:54:00 +0000

It looks pretty cool, but will it be compatible with the ranger in the future of software?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:49:00 +0000

Sadly, it appears that fictional representations do not count as such. If not, then nothing from the current wave of technology products would be patentable.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 14 Dec 2011 07:18:00 +0000

PRIOR ART …. !!!! … lol.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 14 Dec 2011 07:11:00 +0000

Cool!