Sitting on the SlashGear test bench for the past week or so has been Gateway’s FX6800-01e PC, and boy have we wanted to tell you about it. Outwardly there’s little to suggest – beyond the color scheme, which edges on the vibrant – that the FX6800-01e is anything other than a standard Gateway machine, but the giveaway is the discrete Intel Core i7 badge. This is one of the first systems to use Intel’s next-gen processor, formerly known as Nehalem, marking a significant architecture change from the Core series. The FX6800-01e is based on an Intel Core i7-920 2.66GHz quad-core processor; the biggest question remains, is performance increase as revolutionary as the architecture?
Physically, there’s little to distinguish the new FX6800 from the Gateway FX6710, which launched recently. The case stands around 18-inches high, finished in black with orange metallic accents, and up front there’s a 15-in-1 memory card reader, two USB 2.0 ports and a Firewire socket. The first drive bay slot sports a touch panel navigation system, with volume and media controls. Round the back there are a further six USB ports, another Firewire, two eSATA ports and two PS/2 ports, together with gigabit ethernet, a modem and one COM port.
Aside from the Core i7-920, the FX6800-01e has 3GB of DDR3, triple-channel 1066MHz RAM, a 750GB 7,200rpm SATA-II hard-drive, SuperMulti-format DVD burner with LabelFlash and 7.1-channel high-def audio with Creative’s X-Fi XtremeGamer sound enhancement. Graphics come courtesy of ATI’s Radeon HD 4850, with 512MB of its own GDDR3 graphics memory, two DVI ports (with HDMI and VGA adapters included) and a single S-Video output. Gateway made storage expansion straightforward by providing two SATA drive bays fitted with swap-cages in the front drive slot.
OS is Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit with SP1, and there’s the usual bevy of trialware. In fact, despite the new processor, everything seems pretty much as-normal when you turn the Gateway on; start-up time is roughly the same as you’d experience with a similar speed Core 2 Quad CPU.
Of course, the first thing we wanted to run were the benchmarks. The Core i7-920 is the mainstream Nehalem processor, 45nm with four cores capable of eight threads and with a TDP of 130W. Above it lie the Core i7-940, at 2.93GHz, and the Core-i7-965, at 3.20GHz. Our comparison system was based on an Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 CPU running at 3.0GHz, also with 3GB of RAM. We tested using Geekbench v2.0.19 32-bit, which individually assesses the systems in four different categories: integer, floating point, memory and stream.
Benchmarks only tell part of a story (no matter how much we all enjoy seeing different colored graphs), though, and real-world performance of the Core i7 series will depend on a number of factors. Not least among these is the applications you plan on running: a change in processor architecture means that, for software to take full advantage of the i7’s four cores and eight threads, it has to be coded properly. That means that, out of the box, the FX6800-01e excels at media processing and other data crunching tasks, as well as making a damned fine work machine, but if you’re a gamer you’ll perhaps not notice such a leap in performance with the current crop of titles.
Nonetheless, the absence of a massive leap in gaming performance doesn’t mean the Gateway FX6800-01e is any way lacking on that score. The combination of the Core i7-920 and ATI’s Radeon HD 4850 graphics saw 69fps at 1,680 x 1,050 in Call of Duty 4, which is certainly nothing to be sniffed at. Based on the knowledge that developers will soon be coding to take advantage to the new Intel architecture, the FX6800-01e arguably knocks the socks off of current gaming PCs for longevity.
Of course, all that hinges on price, a factor we’re currently in the dark about. In fact, we don’t know exactly when the Gateway FX6800-01e will launch, except that it will be sometime in November to coordinate with Intel’s own official announcement. The FX6710, with its Core 2 Quad 2.66GHz processor, has an MRSP of $1,200 with – CPU and RAM excepting – similar specs to the FX6800-01e; leaked details regarding the Core i7 suggest the i7-920 alone costs $284 (when bought in thousand-unit quantities), then factor in the higher-spec RAM (albeit half the amount).
The latest hardware is seldom cheap, though, and at least with Core i7 you’re buying into the next-generation (with the promise of even higher performance once developers get the hang of Nehalem-style coding) rather than the peak of the current crop. General users won’t need Core i7 today – just as they probably don’t need a Core 2 Quad either – but those with more specialist needs should give the Gateway FX6800-01e (and, more generally, the Core i7 CPU) a closer look.



LOGIN
REGISTER























The fx6800-01e looks good on paper, but if you are unfortunate enough to own one of these you know it doesn’t nearly as good in real life. I have 2 major and 1 debilitating issue with this computer. 1st major issue: the power supply is not only low but it is the incorrect type for the motherboard. The motherboard needs an 8 pin connector to be powered correctly, however the PSU is only a 4 pin. Four of the eight pins on the motherboard are left empty. Furthermore Gateway advertises it as 500w but it is really 450 watts, with a max output of 500watts for no longer then 17 seconds. (this is printed on the PSU’s sticker)
2nd major issue: the case, while having two PCIeX16 slots is nice the reality is that if you add a second HD4850 gpu to your system the top card will constantly overheat causing the entire computer to shut-off during graphic intensive operation. Literally the power cuts off and then the computer restarts, even if you run the top cards fan at 100% and set both cards core and memory clocks to their lowest settings.
Now for the DEBILITATING ISSUE: The motherboard which may be a fine piece of hardware has a crap BIOS. You can not adjust anything in the mobo’s BIOS which means that even if you spend a little extra cash to get performance ram you will only be able to run the Ram at the preset 1066mhz, while everyone else in the world with an i7 is running their’s at 1600mhz to 2000mhz. Also although the processor has a good cooling solution, you can not increase the processor speed. So although you could probly overclock it easily to around 3.3ghz, which almost all i7 920 setup’s can handle, this BIOS doesn’t let you. Furthermore the i7’s Turbo Boost technology which automatically shuts down idle cores and reroutes the power to active one’s while increasing their core multiplier and thus clock speed is not available on the initial BIOS version that comes with the computer. While Gateway does provide a BIOS update download which enables this feature, they do not provide any instructions on how to install the update. If you google this issue you will come across people who have tried to flash the BIOS anyway which left them with an unbootable computer. Furthermore Gateway provides no free technical service for this issue and if you pay the $50 for tech assistance they still cant help you and your just out $50. Not being able to change BIOS settings is un-heard of and rediculous. I have never felt so ripped in my life. I will end up spending over $1000 in addition to my inital purchase to get this computer to where it can run a game like Crysis with a decent frame rate. All in all I am going to have to replace the motherboard, power supply, processor fan (cant mount the original on any other motherboard), and graphics card. And that is assuming a micro ATX motherboard will fit correctly in this case, and that I will be able to install an intake fan on the front of the case for adequate cooling of graphics cards, and find a processor fan that will work with this case also. So there is a good chance I will have get a new case also and end up spending more on upgrades then I did on the original computer. Gateway wanted something that looked good on paper and was cheap to make, they didnt care how many corners they cut to do so, or what that would mean for user experience. DO NOT TRUST REVIEWS OF THIS COMPUTER THEY ONLY LOOK AT WHAT THE BASIC SPECS ARE AND NOT HOW THIS COMPUTER ACTUALLY PERFORMS OR THE MYRAID OF ISSUES IT ACTUALLY HAS. And just as a final note, this computer was completely unstable before I even so opened the case to see what was really going on in there. It had random system sytem crashes daily, and program crashes hourly. The windows vista Reliability Monitor displays a downward sloping line graph which plunges towards the bottom and then levels out somewhere around “miscellaneous failures”