<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GALAXY Tab 10.1 &amp; 8.9 Hands-on [CTIA 2011]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-tab-10-1-8-9-hands-on-ctia-2011-22141601/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-tab-10-1-8-9-hands-on-ctia-2011-22141601/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Quee Yu Lian</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-tab-10-1-8-9-hands-on-ctia-2011-22141601/#comment-110943</link>
		<dc:creator>William Quee Yu Lian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 03:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=141601#comment-110943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can yours make an article of Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 versus Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can yours make an article of Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 versus Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wanda Dixon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-tab-10-1-8-9-hands-on-ctia-2011-22141601/#comment-110806</link>
		<dc:creator>Wanda Dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 09:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=141601#comment-110806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw your this product its a really so wondering and nice, and i got a some good information in this site.
http://healthproductadvice.com/ultraslim-review/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw your this product its a really so wondering and nice, and i got a some good information in this site.<br />
<a href="http://healthproductadvice.com/ultraslim-review/" rel="nofollow">http://healthproductadvice.com/ultraslim-review/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T-Mobile Deals</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-tab-10-1-8-9-hands-on-ctia-2011-22141601/#comment-104220</link>
		<dc:creator>T-Mobile Deals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 12:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=141601#comment-104220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the nice blog
Thanks for sharing with us, its really beneficial for me.


http://www.cellhub.com/t-mobile-cell-phones/samsung-sgh-t849-galaxy-tab-glossy-black.html

Samsung Galaxy Tab 
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the nice blog<br />
Thanks for sharing with us, its really beneficial for me.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cellhub.com/t-mobile-cell-phones/samsung-sgh-t849-galaxy-tab-glossy-black.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cellhub.com/t-mobile-cell-phones/samsung-sgh-t849-galaxy-tab-glossy-black.html</a></p>
<p>Samsung Galaxy Tab </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-tab-10-1-8-9-hands-on-ctia-2011-22141601/#comment-102108</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=141601#comment-102108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All rather moot without he two most important bits of information...

Price?
Date?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All rather moot without he two most important bits of information&#8230;</p>
<p>Price?<br />
Date?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deeepjhonny12</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-tab-10-1-8-9-hands-on-ctia-2011-22141601/#comment-102051</link>
		<dc:creator>deeepjhonny12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 06:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=141601#comment-102051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is best and appropriate option for transparent and mobilize to change the game.  It is not only effective but also safest option. This one my special thanks and appreciation to all our valued customers. So join and make us a part of your celebrations  we are coming with Nokia.

http://www.cellhub.com/t-mobile-cell-phones/nokia-astound-frosty-metal.html

Nokia Astound]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is best and appropriate option for transparent and mobilize to change the game.  It is not only effective but also safest option. This one my special thanks and appreciation to all our valued customers. So join and make us a part of your celebrations  we are coming with Nokia.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cellhub.com/t-mobile-cell-phones/nokia-astound-frosty-metal.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cellhub.com/t-mobile-cell-phones/nokia-astound-frosty-metal.html</a></p>
<p>Nokia Astound</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henudierr</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-tab-10-1-8-9-hands-on-ctia-2011-22141601/#comment-102044</link>
		<dc:creator>Henudierr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 04:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=141601#comment-102044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it is very much fine, i like it.
http://healthproductadvice.com/african-mango-plus-review/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is very much fine, i like it.<br />
<a href="http://healthproductadvice.com/african-mango-plus-review/" rel="nofollow">http://healthproductadvice.com/african-mango-plus-review/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: docjang4kids</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-tab-10-1-8-9-hands-on-ctia-2011-22141601/#comment-101541</link>
		<dc:creator>docjang4kids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=141601#comment-101541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[is there a usb port for flash drive the samsung galaxy tab 10.1 and 8.9?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is there a usb port for flash drive the samsung galaxy tab 10.1 and 8.9?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-tab-10-1-8-9-hands-on-ctia-2011-22141601/#comment-101467</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 06:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=141601#comment-101467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... I just wanted to be able to compare the dimensions of 8.9 galaxy tab and ipad. Hard when they&#039;re not both in landscape or portrait. I have no idea what point you&#039;re trying to make.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; I just wanted to be able to compare the dimensions of 8.9 galaxy tab and ipad. Hard when they&#8217;re not both in landscape or portrait. I have no idea what point you&#8217;re trying to make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DirettoreSabino</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-tab-10-1-8-9-hands-on-ctia-2011-22141601/#comment-101463</link>
		<dc:creator>DirettoreSabino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 06:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=141601#comment-101463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;And the pictures? All of them in landscape... EXCEPT THE FREAKING IPAD!! Christ.&quot;

Is this a real question?  Every shred of evidence about the Samsungs point to their natural default and primary position as being in landscape mode. 

1)  The connection port is on the long side, rather than the width side like on iPad.  
2)  Samsungs logo and all it&#039;s text markings are labeled to be read in landscape position  
3)  The cameras sits at the &quot;top&quot;  
4)  As part of the design, the metal(?) material cuts out over the rest of the black back on the length side, on what appears to be the the &quot;top&quot;  
5)  The form factor (dimensions) of both Samsungs is widescreen or landscape (closer to 16:9), as opposed to the more traditional ipad closer to 4:3 aspect ratio
6)  Pretty much every review of Android Honeycomb have mentioned that the OS itself is designed to be predominantly oriented in landscape position.
7)  Not almost every video demonstrating Honeycomb show it operating in landscape.

These are subjective opinions stating one is better than the other.  These are objective facts that point to a logical default and primary positioning of the device.  I can&#039;t think of a single piece of evidence from a user perspective that would warrant more picture in portrait, mode, unless it was  actually on showing a portrait with longer height than width, or showing a webpage, or maybe a word type document or book.  But aside from offical demos, there werent any significant videos of this thing on, up and running]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And the pictures? All of them in landscape&#8230; EXCEPT THE FREAKING IPAD!! Christ.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is this a real question?  Every shred of evidence about the Samsungs point to their natural default and primary position as being in landscape mode. </p>
<p>1)  The connection port is on the long side, rather than the width side like on iPad.<br />
2)  Samsungs logo and all it&#8217;s text markings are labeled to be read in landscape position<br />
3)  The cameras sits at the &#8220;top&#8221;<br />
4)  As part of the design, the metal(?) material cuts out over the rest of the black back on the length side, on what appears to be the the &#8220;top&#8221;<br />
5)  The form factor (dimensions) of both Samsungs is widescreen or landscape (closer to 16:9), as opposed to the more traditional ipad closer to 4:3 aspect ratio<br />
6)  Pretty much every review of Android Honeycomb have mentioned that the OS itself is designed to be predominantly oriented in landscape position.<br />
7)  Not almost every video demonstrating Honeycomb show it operating in landscape.</p>
<p>These are subjective opinions stating one is better than the other.  These are objective facts that point to a logical default and primary positioning of the device.  I can&#8217;t think of a single piece of evidence from a user perspective that would warrant more picture in portrait, mode, unless it was  actually on showing a portrait with longer height than width, or showing a webpage, or maybe a word type document or book.  But aside from offical demos, there werent any significant videos of this thing on, up and running</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DirettoreSabino</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-tab-10-1-8-9-hands-on-ctia-2011-22141601/#comment-101464</link>
		<dc:creator>DirettoreSabino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 06:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=141601#comment-101464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;And the pictures? All of them in landscape... EXCEPT THE FREAKING IPAD!! Christ.&quot;

Is this a real question?  Every shred of evidence about the Samsungs point to their natural default and primary position as being in landscape mode. 

1)  The connection port is on the long side, rather than the width side like on iPad.  
2)  Samsungs logo and all it&#039;s text markings are labeled to be read in landscape position  
3)  The cameras sits at the &quot;top&quot;  
4)  As part of the design, the metal(?) material cuts out over the rest of the black back on the length side, on what appears to be the the &quot;top&quot;  
5)  The form factor (dimensions) of both Samsungs is widescreen or landscape (closer to 16:9), as opposed to the more traditional ipad closer to 4:3 aspect ratio
6)  Pretty much every review of Android Honeycomb have mentioned that the OS itself is designed to be predominantly oriented in landscape position.
7)  Not almost every video demonstrating Honeycomb show it operating in landscape.

These are subjective opinions stating one is better than the other.  These are objective facts that point to a logical default and primary positioning of the device.  I can&#039;t think of a single piece of evidence from a user perspective that would warrant more picture in portrait, mode, unless it was  actually on showing a portrait with longer height than width, or showing a webpage, or maybe a word type document or book.  But aside from offical demos, there werent any significant videos of this thing on, up and running]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And the pictures? All of them in landscape&#8230; EXCEPT THE FREAKING IPAD!! Christ.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is this a real question?  Every shred of evidence about the Samsungs point to their natural default and primary position as being in landscape mode. </p>
<p>1)  The connection port is on the long side, rather than the width side like on iPad.<br />
2)  Samsungs logo and all it&#8217;s text markings are labeled to be read in landscape position<br />
3)  The cameras sits at the &#8220;top&#8221;<br />
4)  As part of the design, the metal(?) material cuts out over the rest of the black back on the length side, on what appears to be the the &#8220;top&#8221;<br />
5)  The form factor (dimensions) of both Samsungs is widescreen or landscape (closer to 16:9), as opposed to the more traditional ipad closer to 4:3 aspect ratio<br />
6)  Pretty much every review of Android Honeycomb have mentioned that the OS itself is designed to be predominantly oriented in landscape position.<br />
7)  Not almost every video demonstrating Honeycomb show it operating in landscape.</p>
<p>These are subjective opinions stating one is better than the other.  These are objective facts that point to a logical default and primary positioning of the device.  I can&#8217;t think of a single piece of evidence from a user perspective that would warrant more picture in portrait, mode, unless it was  actually on showing a portrait with longer height than width, or showing a webpage, or maybe a word type document or book.  But aside from offical demos, there werent any significant videos of this thing on, up and running</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-tab-10-1-8-9-hands-on-ctia-2011-22141601/#comment-101444</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 03:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=141601#comment-101444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe it&#039;s by the string quartet. See here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbnkVFZTZdU]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe it&#8217;s by the string quartet. See here: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbnkVFZTZdU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbnkVFZTZdU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-tab-10-1-8-9-hands-on-ctia-2011-22141601/#comment-101445</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 03:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=141601#comment-101445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe it&#039;s by the string quartet. See here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbnkVFZTZdU]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe it&#8217;s by the string quartet. See here: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbnkVFZTZdU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbnkVFZTZdU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael J. Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-tab-10-1-8-9-hands-on-ctia-2011-22141601/#comment-101394</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael J. Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=141601#comment-101394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a version of &quot;God Moving Over The Face Of Waters&quot; by Moby. You can thank the Soundhound app for that info. Ha.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a version of &#8220;God Moving Over The Face Of Waters&#8221; by Moby. You can thank the Soundhound app for that info. Ha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-tab-10-1-8-9-hands-on-ctia-2011-22141601/#comment-101385</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=141601#comment-101385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why on earth do they insist on having the iPad in portrait? I want to compare the other dimensions of the tablets, but NOOOOO... most frustrating list of videos ever.

And the pictures? All of them in landscape... EXCEPT THE FREAKING IPAD!! Christ.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why on earth do they insist on having the iPad in portrait? I want to compare the other dimensions of the tablets, but NOOOOO&#8230; most frustrating list of videos ever.</p>
<p>And the pictures? All of them in landscape&#8230; EXCEPT THE FREAKING IPAD!! Christ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rus Bufton</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-tab-10-1-8-9-hands-on-ctia-2011-22141601/#comment-101335</link>
		<dc:creator>Rus Bufton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=141601#comment-101335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They both look very nice, but I&#039;m not keen on the TouchWiz UI. At the moment, I&#039;ve got my heart set on the Moto Xoom, but if Samsung keep to their word, and release the GT 10.1 without TouchWiz, that could be my tablet.

By the way, what is the music playing in the background on the TouchWiz video?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They both look very nice, but I&#8217;m not keen on the TouchWiz UI. At the moment, I&#8217;ve got my heart set on the Moto Xoom, but if Samsung keep to their word, and release the GT 10.1 without TouchWiz, that could be my tablet.</p>
<p>By the way, what is the music playing in the background on the TouchWiz video?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-tab-10-1-8-9-hands-on-ctia-2011-22141601/#comment-101314</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=141601#comment-101314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like they ditched the textured back for the 10.1 version. Shame, it made it look nicer and easier to hold, even at the expense of slightly thicker.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like they ditched the textured back for the 10.1 version. Shame, it made it look nicer and easier to hold, even at the expense of slightly thicker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n900mixalot</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-tab-10-1-8-9-hands-on-ctia-2011-22141601/#comment-101304</link>
		<dc:creator>n900mixalot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=141601#comment-101304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just don&#039;t get why they ditched the 7 so quickly. Hasn&#039;t even been a year, but it HAS been 7 months and no update in sight.

If they really listened to what the customers wanted they&#039;d have thought about an update--or at least releasing the 7 from its chains.

The pricing on the wifi versions though ... not bad. Not bad at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t get why they ditched the 7 so quickly. Hasn&#8217;t even been a year, but it HAS been 7 months and no update in sight.</p>
<p>If they really listened to what the customers wanted they&#8217;d have thought about an update&#8211;or at least releasing the 7 from its chains.</p>
<p>The pricing on the wifi versions though &#8230; not bad. Not bad at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
