Comments on: Galaxy S III fake appears in the wild

By: Motorola Atrix forum

Motorola Atrix forum — Sun, 29 Apr 2012 15:38:00 +0000

This just looks like a slightly scaled down version of Note.

By: A3212

A3212 — Sat, 28 Apr 2012 19:23:00 +0000

looks nice

By: masterpapers.com

masterpapers.com — Sat, 28 Apr 2012 15:32:00 +0000

oh my god…

By: pinetreehater

pinetreehater — Sat, 28 Apr 2012 05:35:00 +0000

worse yet…look at the 135 degree angle lower left..

By: itaintrite

itaintrite — Sat, 28 Apr 2012 02:32:00 +0000

lol, what a horrible photoshop job. Look at the bezel at the top right corner.

By: Spideyhead256

Spideyhead256 — Sat, 28 Apr 2012 01:49:00 +0000

um..that pretty much looks like my s2 on 200 dpi with an ics rom..:|

By: Jason

Jason — Sat, 28 Apr 2012 01:37:00 +0000

I heard the rumor was that the US version would have Qualcomm S4. Various tech magazines ran photocopied “news” to the nature of, “Someone that sports a big wig at Samsung said so to some reporter somewhere.” Very compelling journalist hard data, to be sure. Whatever. If the S III has the 4412, I will probably buy it. If not, Samsung has lost my business again. I do not live in NYC or LA, and I am not with Verizon. So, what do I care about LTE?

By: Jym

Jym — Sat, 28 Apr 2012 00:38:00 +0000

“The dual-core processor will be in place because the quad-core likely does not work with LTE bands.”
By far the most asinine thing I’ve read all day. Thanks for the chuckle.

By: Brad Allison

Brad Allison — Sat, 28 Apr 2012 00:32:00 +0000

I think it looks beautiful