<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Galaxy Nexus benchmarks show device to be near Galaxy S II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeJaVu</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-202397</link>
		<dc:creator>DeJaVu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-202397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And you would also know that the &#039;ROM&#039; has nothing to do with over-clocking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you would also know that the &#8216;ROM&#8217; has nothing to do with over-clocking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bolon3761</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-167853</link>
		<dc:creator>Bolon3761</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-167853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ive owned the best phones...by far...galaxy nexus is smoothest...need tegra 3 and ics together to top it!
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ive owned the best phones&#8230;by far&#8230;galaxy nexus is smoothest&#8230;need tegra 3 and ics together to top it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-156471</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-156471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comparing benchmarks with the Galaxy Nexus running on ICS while the Galaxy S2 is running on Gingerbread?
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comparing benchmarks with the Galaxy Nexus running on ICS while the Galaxy S2 is running on Gingerbread?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 현중 주</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-156237</link>
		<dc:creator>현중 주</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-156237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m pretty sure Quadrant is just being stupid considering I can get 2500 on my Fascinate...

Edit: OC&#039;d of course]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure Quadrant is just being stupid considering I can get 2500 on my Fascinate&#8230;</p>
<p>Edit: OC&#8217;d of course</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas Scott Howell</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155851</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Scott Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 02:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[agreed, my Nexus S is a far better phone than my Galaxy S was.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed, my Nexus S is a far better phone than my Galaxy S was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155498</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You need to get your facts straight - just because the Rezound features a 1.5 ghz processor, doesn&#039;t make it the most powerful - the 1,5 ghz S3 isn&#039;t better than the TI OMAP 4460 or the Exynos... check some benchmarks mate]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to get your facts straight &#8211; just because the Rezound features a 1.5 ghz processor, doesn&#8217;t make it the most powerful &#8211; the 1,5 ghz S3 isn&#8217;t better than the TI OMAP 4460 or the Exynos&#8230; check some benchmarks mate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bluskell</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155420</link>
		<dc:creator>Bluskell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 01:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you go to Texas Instrument&#039;s website you will see the 4460 clocks at 1.5 ghz for all ghzfreaks. That being said it is underclocked probably for battery. So if your concerned about benchmarks overclock it to a stable 1.5 ghz and enjoy :) No phone w similar specs will outperform this phone on reliability and performance while maintaining decent battery life. It&#039;s pure google.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you go to Texas Instrument&#8217;s website you will see the 4460 clocks at 1.5 ghz for all ghzfreaks. That being said it is underclocked probably for battery. So if your concerned about benchmarks overclock it to a stable 1.5 ghz and enjoy :) No phone w similar specs will outperform this phone on reliability and performance while maintaining decent battery life. It&#8217;s pure google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guitarmanjoe</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155411</link>
		<dc:creator>Guitarmanjoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My GS2 (A real one with a 1.2ghz Exynos not the crappy one with the 1.5ghz qualcomm soc) scores 3500-3600 on quadrant stock. That destroys the rezound&#039;s measly 2400-2600.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My GS2 (A real one with a 1.2ghz Exynos not the crappy one with the 1.5ghz qualcomm soc) scores 3500-3600 on quadrant stock. That destroys the rezound&#8217;s measly 2400-2600.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155400</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 22:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sunspider and browser marks are terrible way of measuring hardware performance over different OS/browsers. SGS2 with opera/ff supposedly gets sub 1500ms in sunsipider]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sunspider and browser marks are terrible way of measuring hardware performance over different OS/browsers. SGS2 with opera/ff supposedly gets sub 1500ms in sunsipider</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Birdnest NYC</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155378</link>
		<dc:creator>Birdnest NYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even ConsumerReport does a better comparison]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even ConsumerReport does a better comparison</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AppleFUD</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155366</link>
		<dc:creator>AppleFUD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe. . . but you are going off rumors at this point. And let&#039;s say that it does come out next month but has terrible battery life, would you still want it?

And how&#039;s the battery life on most of HTC&#039;s LTE phones? Total crap!

Not to mention that clock speed isn&#039;t everything. The old version of this OMAP processor is in the PlayBook and it pushes 1080p video while multitasking while the ipad 2 &amp; Tegra 2 chips can&#039;t compete. 

It&#039;s about over-all performance not just GHz. And from the reviews I&#039;ve seen of the gNexus, it looks like Google put together a very good over-all package.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe. . . but you are going off rumors at this point. And let&#8217;s say that it does come out next month but has terrible battery life, would you still want it?</p>
<p>And how&#8217;s the battery life on most of HTC&#8217;s LTE phones? Total crap!</p>
<p>Not to mention that clock speed isn&#8217;t everything. The old version of this OMAP processor is in the PlayBook and it pushes 1080p video while multitasking while the ipad 2 &amp; Tegra 2 chips can&#8217;t compete. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s about over-all performance not just GHz. And from the reviews I&#8217;ve seen of the gNexus, it looks like Google put together a very good over-all package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AppleFUD</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155365</link>
		<dc:creator>AppleFUD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve seen that else where as well. And is seems to be a very valid argument especially considering some of the battery life issues we are seeing--the OMAP 4 still gets good battery life on LTE.

Not to mentions, the processor will most likely handle anything thrown at it over the next couple of years. The older version of this processor is in the PlayBook and that is (soon was) the only tablet that could output 1080p directly AND do something else--the great iPad 2 can&#039;t do it and the Tegra 2 can&#039;t.

Sometimes I think there&#039;s people spewing all this FUD about the Nexus not having THE top of the line specs just to detract from the reality that it&#039;s an &quot;all around great device&quot;--no software updates to worry about, optimized by Google for the hardware, all around good performance, etc.

I don&#039;t see the need for the &quot;fastest processor&quot; in a phone if it&#039;s going to kill the battery life. I would much rather have an all around great performing device. Specs only count for so much.

And TI are making some great SoC.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen that else where as well. And is seems to be a very valid argument especially considering some of the battery life issues we are seeing&#8211;the OMAP 4 still gets good battery life on LTE.</p>
<p>Not to mentions, the processor will most likely handle anything thrown at it over the next couple of years. The older version of this processor is in the PlayBook and that is (soon was) the only tablet that could output 1080p directly AND do something else&#8211;the great iPad 2 can&#8217;t do it and the Tegra 2 can&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Sometimes I think there&#8217;s people spewing all this FUD about the Nexus not having THE top of the line specs just to detract from the reality that it&#8217;s an &#8220;all around great device&#8221;&#8211;no software updates to worry about, optimized by Google for the hardware, all around good performance, etc.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see the need for the &#8220;fastest processor&#8221; in a phone if it&#8217;s going to kill the battery life. I would much rather have an all around great performing device. Specs only count for so much.</p>
<p>And TI are making some great SoC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155360</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, the demo is so AMATEURISH...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, the demo is so AMATEURISH&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arsalanzhd</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155337</link>
		<dc:creator>Arsalanzhd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hey stupid bench marks dont mean shit, didnt the 4s get a 6000 if not more and it has dual core 800 mhz with 512 mb ram, thats sad isnt it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey stupid bench marks dont mean shit, didnt the 4s get a 6000 if not more and it has dual core 800 mhz with 512 mb ram, thats sad isnt it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nobody</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155304</link>
		<dc:creator>Nobody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Benchmarks on AnandTech shows a score of 1879ms in Sunspider 0.9.1.
And 98272 in browser mark. Highest out there.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benchmarks on AnandTech shows a score of 1879ms in Sunspider 0.9.1.<br />
And 98272 in browser mark. Highest out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hafiy92</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155292</link>
		<dc:creator>Hafiy92</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[htc phone no as good samsung phone.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>htc phone no as good samsung phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerëmy</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155278</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerëmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 06:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[trackball is old technology. please go back to 2008.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>trackball is old technology. please go back to 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerëmy</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155277</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerëmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 06:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i read they might have chosen TI because of radios... just like Tmo and ATT LTE S2 aren&#039;t Exynos.. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i read they might have chosen TI because of radios&#8230; just like Tmo and ATT LTE S2 aren&#8217;t Exynos.. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerëmy</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155273</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerëmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 06:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[umm. do u work for HTC? who says it&#039;s complete? jeez.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>umm. do u work for HTC? who says it&#8217;s complete? jeez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corwin1681</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155264</link>
		<dc:creator>Corwin1681</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 06:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[samsung makes tvs. Google put HTC on the map. and with LG - google could&#039;ve have a lot more input on what the phone should be... because i&#039;m sure samsung did everything they could to make nexus phone inferior to their TouchWiz line]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>samsung makes tvs. Google put HTC on the map. and with LG &#8211; google could&#8217;ve have a lot more input on what the phone should be&#8230; because i&#8217;m sure samsung did everything they could to make nexus phone inferior to their TouchWiz line</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corwin1681</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155262</link>
		<dc:creator>Corwin1681</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 06:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and i wont. HTC is better anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and i wont. HTC is better anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damon4799</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155254</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon4799</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 05:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...better than buying an overrated iphone. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;better than buying an overrated iphone. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trob6969</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155248</link>
		<dc:creator>Trob6969</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 05:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The htc edge is already complete although there is no release date. For those who don&#039;t know, it&#039;s a quad core phone with DOUBLE the processing power of the most powerful smartphone out now (the 1.5 dual core htc rezound)!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The htc edge is already complete although there is no release date. For those who don&#8217;t know, it&#8217;s a quad core phone with DOUBLE the processing power of the most powerful smartphone out now (the 1.5 dual core htc rezound)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trob6969</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155247</link>
		<dc:creator>Trob6969</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 05:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you seen the YouTube video where the gs2 quadrant score got CRUSHED by the htc rezound?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen the YouTube video where the gs2 quadrant score got CRUSHED by the htc rezound?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155242</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well there is a huge difference between A8 model 1.5GHz from Qualcomm and A9 Cortex model 1.5GHz  from TI. Huge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well there is a huge difference between A8 model 1.5GHz from Qualcomm and A9 Cortex model 1.5GHz  from TI. Huge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D16001014</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155239</link>
		<dc:creator>D16001014</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about the battery life? Every Samsung I&#039;ve ever owned I&#039;ve had battery issues with. They don&#039;t last very long. 6 months at most. That would be my concern with ANY Samsung device?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the battery life? Every Samsung I&#8217;ve ever owned I&#8217;ve had battery issues with. They don&#8217;t last very long. 6 months at most. That would be my concern with ANY Samsung device?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155237</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 03:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem is, by the time someone comes up with an o/c kernel, the GS2 will have one, it already has a 1.5ghz dual core (I have the T-Mobile version), pushing both equally hard, the GS2 will still leave it behind.  There&#039;s already a ROM available with a 1.6ghz o/c for the GS2. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is, by the time someone comes up with an o/c kernel, the GS2 will have one, it already has a 1.5ghz dual core (I have the T-Mobile version), pushing both equally hard, the GS2 will still leave it behind.  There&#8217;s already a ROM available with a 1.6ghz o/c for the GS2. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155236</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 03:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google didn&#039;t choose LG because they wanted a phone worthy of the nexus moniker. LG should definitely stick to TVs and refrigerators, let real tech companies make smartphones. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google didn&#8217;t choose LG because they wanted a phone worthy of the nexus moniker. LG should definitely stick to TVs and refrigerators, let real tech companies make smartphones. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155235</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 03:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aside from the screen size and screen resolution,  the GS2 is really the way to go. The GS2s 1.5ghz dual core and 4.52in screen still push it right to the top. I just benchmarked my GS2, after a long day, with several apps currently open, it benched at 3047 on quadrant standard. My phone is 100% stock, only rooted so I can use titanium backup and root explorer.  I can only imagine what this phones capable of with a clean and vanilla copy of ICS. I came from a vibrant, rooted and pushed to a stable 1.6ghz, this phone makes my vibrant look like it&#039;s standing still. The Nexus is an impressive piece of hardware,  but not enough so to topplethe GS2. Samsung never ceases to amaze.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from the screen size and screen resolution,  the GS2 is really the way to go. The GS2s 1.5ghz dual core and 4.52in screen still push it right to the top. I just benchmarked my GS2, after a long day, with several apps currently open, it benched at 3047 on quadrant standard. My phone is 100% stock, only rooted so I can use titanium backup and root explorer.  I can only imagine what this phones capable of with a clean and vanilla copy of ICS. I came from a vibrant, rooted and pushed to a stable 1.6ghz, this phone makes my vibrant look like it&#8217;s standing still. The Nexus is an impressive piece of hardware,  but not enough so to topplethe GS2. Samsung never ceases to amaze.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155234</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 03:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[except lot of these tests are graphics tests and it won&#039;t impact the score as much. As much as people justify lower scores with resolution on tests like quadrant, it accounts for very small portion of the test score]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>except lot of these tests are graphics tests and it won&#8217;t impact the score as much. As much as people justify lower scores with resolution on tests like quadrant, it accounts for very small portion of the test score</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155233</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 03:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please do not buy samsung phones and let the rest of the world purchase them]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please do not buy samsung phones and let the rest of the world purchase them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corwin1681</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155228</link>
		<dc:creator>Corwin1681</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 02:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CyanogenMod already said that it will have ICS MOD in 2 months.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CyanogenMod already said that it will have ICS MOD in 2 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AppleFUD</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155227</link>
		<dc:creator>AppleFUD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[uh. . .because the OMAP4 4470 won&#039;t be out till the first half of 2012. . .  
So, my guess is Google wanted the device out before the holiday season in 2011. 

There are other reasons Google chose the OMAP. . . phonearena and others have written some good articles about that. All in all, from what I&#039;ve read it&#039;s a great chip for this device at this point in time. Of course in a few months there will be phones supporting more powerful chips but that&#039;s the world of mobile tech right now--it&#039;s advancing at a very fast pace thanks to the open competitive nature of the ARM architecture = good stuff. Nonetheless, this chip should give this device very good performance along with good battery life while supporting high-speed data.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uh. . .because the OMAP4 4470 won&#8217;t be out till the first half of 2012. . .  <br />
So, my guess is Google wanted the device out before the holiday season in 2011. </p>
<p>There are other reasons Google chose the OMAP. . . phonearena and others have written some good articles about that. All in all, from what I&#8217;ve read it&#8217;s a great chip for this device at this point in time. Of course in a few months there will be phones supporting more powerful chips but that&#8217;s the world of mobile tech right now&#8211;it&#8217;s advancing at a very fast pace thanks to the open competitive nature of the ARM architecture = good stuff. Nonetheless, this chip should give this device very good performance along with good battery life while supporting high-speed data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AppleFUD</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155224</link>
		<dc:creator>AppleFUD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 01:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[precisely. . .
However, GS II may do even better once it gets ICS. We&#039;ll have to see. Nonetheless, gNexus is looking pretty darn good with those benchmarks and supporting 4.6&quot; 1280X720 res.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>precisely. . .<br />
However, GS II may do even better once it gets ICS. We&#8217;ll have to see. Nonetheless, gNexus is looking pretty darn good with those benchmarks and supporting 4.6&#8243; 1280X720 res.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Blurton</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155223</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Blurton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 01:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aren&#039;t they both made by Samsung?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t they both made by Samsung?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155222</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 01:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sadly it was google&#039;s decision to use TI as hero chipset in Galaxy Nexus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly it was google&#8217;s decision to use TI as hero chipset in Galaxy Nexus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bon K</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155221</link>
		<dc:creator>Bon K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 01:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is doing as well or slightly better than GS II with many more pixels to push around. Is this a right way to take it?
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is doing as well or slightly better than GS II with many more pixels to push around. Is this a right way to take it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155219</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 01:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i am still convinced that Samsung did not want the Galaxy Nexus to kick the crap out of there Flagship  Galaxy2  i know for a fact that the specs on the Nexus are Mediocre do not get me wrong the Nexus rocks and i plan on buying it  but Samsung made damn sure it was not to par.  if you comment against what i am pointing out which is fact than tell why is this phone using a 3yr old GPU  and why not the better Omap4 4470 chip this phone should be rocking the house, but the specs are just barley above the Galaxy2 specs which has been out for over a year now.. and what makes this even worse the Galaxy Nexus has not been released yet on Verizon and by the time it is released, Samsung will suddenly  have a phone that will trump this phone by January WTF! and with a SD Card slot inside.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am still convinced that Samsung did not want the Galaxy Nexus to kick the crap out of there Flagship  Galaxy2  i know for a fact that the specs on the Nexus are Mediocre do not get me wrong the Nexus rocks and i plan on buying it  but Samsung made damn sure it was not to par.  if you comment against what i am pointing out which is fact than tell why is this phone using a 3yr old GPU  and why not the better Omap4 4470 chip this phone should be rocking the house, but the specs are just barley above the Galaxy2 specs which has been out for over a year now.. and what makes this even worse the Galaxy Nexus has not been released yet on Verizon and by the time it is released, Samsung will suddenly  have a phone that will trump this phone by January WTF! and with a SD Card slot inside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiran Konathala</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155214</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiran Konathala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice review of the Nexus Prime. I am wondering how long it takes the mods to churn out a ROM for Galaxy family!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review of the Nexus Prime. I am wondering how long it takes the mods to churn out a ROM for Galaxy family!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rimfire</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/#comment-155215</link>
		<dc:creator>Rimfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=196660#comment-155215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Had a Samsung phone already.  Pretty good computer to carry around, but in weak coverage areas, a pretty lousy phone.  Are there any tests to look for the sensitivity of the phone receiver?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had a Samsung phone already.  Pretty good computer to carry around, but in weak coverage areas, a pretty lousy phone.  Are there any tests to look for the sensitivity of the phone receiver?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
