<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fujifilm X-E1 mirrorless compact gets official</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/fujifilm-x-e1-mirrorless-compact-gets-official-06246186/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/fujifilm-x-e1-mirrorless-compact-gets-official-06246186/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: plunder</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/fujifilm-x-e1-mirrorless-compact-gets-official-06246186/#comment-235771</link>
		<dc:creator>plunder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 11:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=246186#comment-235771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Probably a reasonable camera, but quite an old style and they need a lot more lenses. Judging by the 14mm, that will NOT be cheap. If I was interested in this kind of camera, the Sony looks like a better bet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably a reasonable camera, but quite an old style and they need a lot more lenses. Judging by the 14mm, that will NOT be cheap. If I was interested in this kind of camera, the Sony looks like a better bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
