<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foxconn rumored to be testing 46 to 55-inch Apple television sets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/foxconn-rumored-to-be-testing-46-to-55-inch-apple-television-sets-19261651/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/foxconn-rumored-to-be-testing-46-to-55-inch-apple-television-sets-19261651/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pepee63</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/foxconn-rumored-to-be-testing-46-to-55-inch-apple-television-sets-19261651/#comment-262021</link>
		<dc:creator>pepee63</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 05:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261651#comment-262021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[46 to 55 is the SWEET spot for TV&#039;s .. OMGawd, what a fanboy. I suppose you said the same thing about the iphone&#039;s 3.5 inch screen. How many people would buy a 70 inch screen TV, if they were selling for the same money as a 46 inch. Sweet spot my arse. Apple releases it and you think its the best size. Why do you think the masses are buying large screen phones. Large screens on anything is awesome. 50 inch is so last year. Although, thinking about it, it would suit  Apple to bring out a screen this size while everyone else is making theirs larger.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>46 to 55 is the SWEET spot for TV&#8217;s .. OMGawd, what a fanboy. I suppose you said the same thing about the iphone&#8217;s 3.5 inch screen. How many people would buy a 70 inch screen TV, if they were selling for the same money as a 46 inch. Sweet spot my arse. Apple releases it and you think its the best size. Why do you think the masses are buying large screen phones. Large screens on anything is awesome. 50 inch is so last year. Although, thinking about it, it would suit  Apple to bring out a screen this size while everyone else is making theirs larger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haloguy628</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/foxconn-rumored-to-be-testing-46-to-55-inch-apple-television-sets-19261651/#comment-262016</link>
		<dc:creator>haloguy628</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 05:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261651#comment-262016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This will be the final stab to the heart for apple. They are out of ideas and out of RDF. Back to periphery you go apple.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will be the final stab to the heart for apple. They are out of ideas and out of RDF. Back to periphery you go apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iamchandlerbing</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/foxconn-rumored-to-be-testing-46-to-55-inch-apple-television-sets-19261651/#comment-261979</link>
		<dc:creator>iamchandlerbing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261651#comment-261979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wait for the kirfs that&#039;ll come out before the announcement. that is a sure way of knowing if this is true or not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wait for the kirfs that&#8217;ll come out before the announcement. that is a sure way of knowing if this is true or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: renGek</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/foxconn-rumored-to-be-testing-46-to-55-inch-apple-television-sets-19261651/#comment-261972</link>
		<dc:creator>renGek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 23:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261651#comment-261972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They don&#039;t have a choice. They must put out new products for current iphone and ipad users or their share price will be south of $400 soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They don&#8217;t have a choice. They must put out new products for current iphone and ipad users or their share price will be south of $400 soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matti</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/foxconn-rumored-to-be-testing-46-to-55-inch-apple-television-sets-19261651/#comment-261938</link>
		<dc:creator>Matti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261651#comment-261938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still don&#039;t see how this is a more attractive proposition than the current AppleTV set-top boxes. Most people keep TVs for a long time, far longer than they do computers. Can&#039;t see that many people justifying a replacement TV every 3 or 4 years just to have the latest OS or features. A $100 set-top box that connects to any TV, yes, but a $1K+ TV, I don&#039;t think so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t see how this is a more attractive proposition than the current AppleTV set-top boxes. Most people keep TVs for a long time, far longer than they do computers. Can&#8217;t see that many people justifying a replacement TV every 3 or 4 years just to have the latest OS or features. A $100 set-top box that connects to any TV, yes, but a $1K+ TV, I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heyyou</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/foxconn-rumored-to-be-testing-46-to-55-inch-apple-television-sets-19261651/#comment-261923</link>
		<dc:creator>heyyou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261651#comment-261923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[apple with 4x for $5k]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apple with 4x for $5k</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMG_VII</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/foxconn-rumored-to-be-testing-46-to-55-inch-apple-television-sets-19261651/#comment-261921</link>
		<dc:creator>SMG_VII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261651#comment-261921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fully integrated smart TV&#039;s make no sense in practical terms. Buy a good display and a separate box (Roku or Apple TV); it will be cheaper up front and an order of magnitude cheaper to upgrade when the box hardware goes out of date in a few years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fully integrated smart TV&#8217;s make no sense in practical terms. Buy a good display and a separate box (Roku or Apple TV); it will be cheaper up front and an order of magnitude cheaper to upgrade when the box hardware goes out of date in a few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MediaCritiquer.com</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/foxconn-rumored-to-be-testing-46-to-55-inch-apple-television-sets-19261651/#comment-261913</link>
		<dc:creator>MediaCritiquer.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261651#comment-261913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TV on the iPad is revolutionary.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TV on the iPad is revolutionary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dxfcv</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/foxconn-rumored-to-be-testing-46-to-55-inch-apple-television-sets-19261651/#comment-261906</link>
		<dc:creator>dxfcv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=261651#comment-261906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Variable screen size? Great!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Variable screen size? Great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
