Comments on: Facebook, China and Iran are web freedom threats says Sergey Brin

By: Patrick

Patrick — Fri, 21 Dec 2012 22:48:00 +0000

Chris Davies censored my comment. Truth hurts.

By: CA

CA — Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:17:00 +0000

AWESOME FABULOUS PERFECTLY ACCURATE COMMENT!!!!!!

This is THE BEST WAY to describe what is going on with google.

Google thinks google should own and dictate the internet and anyone who gets in their way is evil.

Dont beleive me about google obsession with power control???…… Just look into their latest stock split!!!
If that is not the most evil power grab in history then hitler is a saint!

By: CA

CA — Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:17:00 +0000

HAHAHA…
LOL

By: CA

CA — Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:15:00 +0000

This guy is a disgusting slimy sh*t talking bastard who conveniently points out his biggest rivals and competitors as “threats” to americans while he is the evil-do-er.

I hope all three of them die of cancer. Today would not be soon enough to RID the planet of such scum disease!

By: CA

CA — Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:11:00 +0000

WOW If I were you I would be ashamed and embarrassed to admit I was basing my opinion on the comment of a teenager who probably had an embarrassing event and got slammed all over school for her one-too-many drinks…

Besides… there is NOTHING to replace facebook.

I think you are delusional if you think Facebook is going ANYWHERE for a while!!!!

By: CA

CA — Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:08:00 +0000

And somehow you think google is any better????

Google is even taking data OUT OF YOUR PERSONAL EMAILS and selling that to companies!!!

When it comes to EVIL…. Google should be placed in the Oxford dictionary as the definition!!!

By: CA

CA — Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:06:00 +0000

WoW!!!!

WOW!!!

WOWOWOWOW!!!!!

OMG look at that… he blamed their biggest competitors and the companies that make products of substantially GREATER quality than their crap code buggy software products and services!!!!

This guy is a dirty disgusting slimy weasle!!!! I would spit on him if i saw him!!!

If anything it is google destroying the open internet by capturing and storing and datamining EVERYTHING WE do thru google search and gmail and other services…

I hope all three evil demon blood suckers get cancer and die this year!!!

Larry Page, Eric Schmidt, and Sergey brin…. DIE OF CANCER you evil bastards!!!!!!

By: companyemails

companyemails — Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:19:00 +0000

I don’t think I need credit to tell that you are a nut job. Its pretty self evident and you are doing a swell job of showing everyone all on your own.

By: VedX

VedX — Tue, 17 Apr 2012 03:36:00 +0000

Sergei, the Billionaire Russian Hypocrite, laughing in his palace: “HA HA! zo, de Americanz, zey sink they hav von the Kold Vor, but now Gookel owns ze Inteernet and Amereeka iz ourz!!!”

By: VedX

VedX — Tue, 17 Apr 2012 03:30:00 +0000

The only evil empire is Google. They force small businesses to bid for expensive ad space or become invisible and perish. Then they steal users’ search data to target ads, invading our privacy. When their Circles fails, they label Facebook as evil. When their bid to launch search in China is thwarted in favor of Baidu, they label China as evil. They place their CEO on Apple’s BoD, and steal their plans for a mobile OS after Jobs mentored their founders. Then when they have Android, they label Apple as evil. Yes, yes, anyone who threatens Google is a threat to the Internet, because Google evidently believes that they ARE the Internet! Anyone which threatens them from making more billions must be destroyed.

By: usasucdiQ

usasucdiQ — Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:23:00 +0000

Sergey Brin, this guy is a billionaire hypocrite who got kicked out of China, cause he probably provided plenty of datas for the CIA and the copyrights of america.
.

By: Peter Cao

Peter Cao — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:30:00 +0000

Here is how Eric Schmidt involved into such anti-humanity crimes
————————————————————-
Eric Schmidt had threatened my life with the death of Stanford student May Zhou during his fight with Stanford. Eric Schmidt is part of this plot in May Zhou’s death. He had also conspired my life at a later time, and which had cost his Google CEO position.

It started from a 2004 Stanford campus assault case, in which a lady named Gabriele Scheler bitterly assaulted me; Police concluded that I am a victim while Scheler is a criminal suspect after serious investigation; However Sebastian Thrun later joined Scheler to false accuse me at Stanford, and Eric Schmidt had joined them to support Sebastian Thrun and Gabriele Scheler against ruling from Stanford and police. During their tough fight with Stanford in the early 2007, Eric Schmidt and Sebasitan Thrun’s side had murderred May Zhou to threaten me, by telling me: “You see May Zhou, she’s an Asian (me too an Asian), … Police might not even find out who did it, what if it happened to you?” , and to terrorize Stanford (because May Zhou is Stanford
student), and they did plot a murder on me as well last year when they found I would not compromise but insist on clarifying their crimes

These accusations had been confirmed by authorities investigation and stand still which Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun dare not deny to the public so far. Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun had not paid for their crimes

By: Peter Cao

Peter Cao — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:05:00 +0000

Eric, the point at this time is, my accusations are clearly stated while you tried to explain yourself with several lies, and also I had challenged the officer who’s responsible for this case, while he/she dare not reply, all of which would make people more curious of what did you involve and more believe in what I said

This case regards to people with background of great powers as Eric Schmidt is, and also regards to crimes as serious as threatening the victim and endangering people’s lives; and already someone innocent like Stanford student May Zhou had mysteriously died and victim’s life was conspired; racial issue is a factor; if the case could not be clarified or leave any points dubious and obscure, it will cost more of human lives in the future. At either moral or legal fronts, there is a necessity to clarify the case to the public.

By: Peter Cao

Peter Cao — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:04:00 +0000

Companyemails, you need to use a real name to get credit

By: companyemails

companyemails — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:15:00 +0000

Peter, you need to loosen up the Tin foil hat. It seems to be cutting circulation to your brain. ;o)

By: Dado Dudo

Dado Dudo — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:10:00 +0000

The point is that the data Google collects can be collected by anyone else, if they invest resources to do so. Does not make any sense for Google to invest resources of gathering the data and then give it away. The data in Apple and Facebook “ecosystems” cannot be gathered by anyone else. This is fine with private data, but the problem is with all other information that we got accustomed to be able to access through internet…

By: Freetochoose

Freetochoose — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:09:00 +0000

Google works for Lucis trust. Corruption in America not china or Iran

By: tommy

tommy — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:03:00 +0000

Did you actually listen to his speech?

Obviously not.

By: tommy

tommy — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:58:00 +0000

“do they share the data their crawlers collect with other companies. The short answer is no. Microsoft Bing and Yahoo search can’t use search
data collected by Google for their search results. If Google was truly
open they would have allowed that.”

Yeah that way Bing would be as good as google and Microsoft would save millions.
Do you realize how silly that sounds?

“truly open” doesn’t mean you give away your goose.

“The one business search/ads that makes money for Google is very tightly locked down by them.”

what does that mean? “very tightly locked down” ? you mean they’re good at it?

“Also for other business like Google Maps any company using the service
has to pay a fee, it’s not free and open like Google wants us to
believe…”

any person or business can use google maps on their website for free. If the map gets used more than 25,000 time a day you have to pay $4 per 1000 over the 25,000. Yeah that’s right, 25,000. If your business gets over 25,000 hits a day then you should chip in for the service. Why is that hard to understand?

By: congressive

congressive — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:49:00 +0000

As most people do, you argue out of fear, not logic. Google is not calling for the public sharing of your bank account information, medical history or your intentionally hidden personal information on Facebook. But you are delusional if you think Facebook shares your personal information with no one, as you would like.

You are their unpaid employee, uploading content with personal places, dates, times and preferences that Facebook sells to advertisers for undisclosed millions, maybe billions of dollars. They’ve convinced you that Facebook is “free” when the only real thing about Facebook that’s free is your creative input to their sales databases. For lack of a more eloquent name, you’re their biatch, and the more of your life you pour into their hard drives, the more dependent you become on your master, and the greater the value of their stock becomes based on monetizing you and your private, intimate information.

All those intimate things you share on Facebook are read by a corporation whose only real mission is to grow stockholder equity. Trust them, they’d NEVER do anything unethical with your life, right?

Riiiiiiight.

By: iorders1

iorders1 — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:15:00 +0000

He is right – while also having Google’s and his own self-interest at heart. But right is right. For their own security, mental health, legacy, dignity, and the health of the current and future internet ecosystem, people should be flocking from Facebook in droves. Time heals all, tho. Despite the media mysticism and the fog machines they clearly must have on 24×7 in the Facebook offices – it will eventually go the way of AOL, Myspace, etc. When you hear a teen declare, ‘Facebook is for old people’ (which I heard last week), well, that is Death knocking at the door ….

By: Teche21

Teche21 — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:59:00 +0000

Actually, I don’t want Facebook to share my info with anyone. Most of the info they collect is very personal and I should decide whether its available to anyone. Also Google talks a lot about open, but do they share all the data their crawlers collect with other companies. The short answer is no. Microsoft Bing and Yahoo search can’t use search data collected by Google for their search results. If Google was truly open they would have allowed that. The one business search/ads that makes money for Google is very tightly locked down by them. Also for other business like Google Maps any company using the service has to pay a fee, it’s not free and open like Google wants us to believe…