<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dish Network 722s HD PVR adds Slingbox &amp; Slingcatcher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/dish-network-722s-hd-pvr-adds-slingbox-slingcatcher-1911675/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/dish-network-722s-hd-pvr-adds-slingbox-slingcatcher-1911675/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 01:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/dish-network-722s-hd-pvr-adds-slingbox-slingcatcher-1911675/#comment-57342</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=11675#comment-57342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find it interesting all the hype on the Sling technology supposedly incorporated into the 722 box.  Here is a challenge - go to the Dish Network site and get me the link to the page that tells you about this feature.  It doesn&#039;t exist.  The literature, even now (months after this marketing department hype) only says the Ethernet port is for future use.  So, where&#039;s the beef?  Please somebody, show me where I am wrong on this.  It looks like vaporware to me... - Phil]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting all the hype on the Sling technology supposedly incorporated into the 722 box.  Here is a challenge &#8211; go to the Dish Network site and get me the link to the page that tells you about this feature.  It doesn&#8217;t exist.  The literature, even now (months after this marketing department hype) only says the Ethernet port is for future use.  So, where&#8217;s the beef?  Please somebody, show me where I am wrong on this.  It looks like vaporware to me&#8230; &#8211; Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
