<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crysis Warhead to play well even on budget PCs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/crysis-warhead-to-play-well-even-on-budget-pcs-2312176/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/crysis-warhead-to-play-well-even-on-budget-pcs-2312176/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 15:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J5</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/crysis-warhead-to-play-well-even-on-budget-pcs-2312176/#comment-43934</link>
		<dc:creator>J5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=12176#comment-43934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s true that the original Crysis is more demanding than most games but lets be honest...it&#039;s not fair to say that most gamers can&#039;t run the game at any higher than medium.  That is just not true.

I have a single 8800 GTX and I run the game at VERY HIGH just fine at 1280x1024 resolution with a very playable frame rate.  Both the 8800 GT and 8800 GTS have very similar performance results as well.  For under $250, you can run Crysis at very impressive settings.  This wasn&#039;t the case when it was released, but the technology has since caught up to the game quite a bit.  

The new mid level ATI and nVidia cards due out this month and next should have no problem running the game at High and Very High with a reasonable resolution setting.

It&#039;d be much more fair to say that most gamers can&#039;t run the game at max details and max resolution.

Now if you want to talk ludicrus settings of Very High at 2560x1600 with 16xAF/4xAA then yes you probably will need a Tri-SLI GTX280 system in the $4000+ price range.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true that the original Crysis is more demanding than most games but lets be honest&#8230;it&#8217;s not fair to say that most gamers can&#8217;t run the game at any higher than medium.  That is just not true.</p>
<p>I have a single 8800 GTX and I run the game at VERY HIGH just fine at 1280&#215;1024 resolution with a very playable frame rate.  Both the 8800 GT and 8800 GTS have very similar performance results as well.  For under $250, you can run Crysis at very impressive settings.  This wasn&#8217;t the case when it was released, but the technology has since caught up to the game quite a bit.  </p>
<p>The new mid level ATI and nVidia cards due out this month and next should have no problem running the game at High and Very High with a reasonable resolution setting.</p>
<p>It&#8217;d be much more fair to say that most gamers can&#8217;t run the game at max details and max resolution.</p>
<p>Now if you want to talk ludicrus settings of Very High at 2560&#215;1600 with 16xAF/4xAA then yes you probably will need a Tri-SLI GTX280 system in the $4000+ price range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
