<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commodore 64 is Back in Business!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/commodore-64-is-back-in-business-07145029/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/commodore-64-is-back-in-business-07145029/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/commodore-64-is-back-in-business-07145029/#comment-185188</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 02:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=145029#comment-185188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 64 ultimate comes with 4gb,  but the 64 extreme comes with 8gb. ram. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 64 ultimate comes with 4gb,  but the 64 extreme comes with 8gb. ram. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/commodore-64-is-back-in-business-07145029/#comment-185189</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 02:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=145029#comment-185189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 64 ultimate comes with 4gb,  but the 64 extreme comes with 8gb. ram. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 64 ultimate comes with 4gb,  but the 64 extreme comes with 8gb. ram. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/commodore-64-is-back-in-business-07145029/#comment-185190</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 02:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=145029#comment-185190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 64 ultimate comes with 4gb,  but the 64 extreme comes with 8gb. ram. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 64 ultimate comes with 4gb,  but the 64 extreme comes with 8gb. ram. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drjack</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/commodore-64-is-back-in-business-07145029/#comment-104178</link>
		<dc:creator>Drjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=145029#comment-104178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The original Commodore 64 had a whopping 64KB of memory. The new one has 4GB, which isn’t huge by today’s standards. I mean, you can get more than that on a tiny little SD card. But it isn’t as if this would be anyone’s primary computer.&quot; - WTF? 4GBs in new Commodore are RAM (just like 64k was in the original). Little tiny SD card is Flash memory; SD cards should be compared to hard disk size, not RAM size. I wasn&#039;t ever expecting to see such mistake on Slashdot!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The original Commodore 64 had a whopping 64KB of memory. The new one has 4GB, which isn’t huge by today’s standards. I mean, you can get more than that on a tiny little SD card. But it isn’t as if this would be anyone’s primary computer.&#8221; &#8211; WTF? 4GBs in new Commodore are RAM (just like 64k was in the original). Little tiny SD card is Flash memory; SD cards should be compared to hard disk size, not RAM size. I wasn&#8217;t ever expecting to see such mistake on Slashdot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drjack</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/commodore-64-is-back-in-business-07145029/#comment-104179</link>
		<dc:creator>Drjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=145029#comment-104179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The original Commodore 64 had a whopping 64KB of memory. The new one has 4GB, which isn’t huge by today’s standards. I mean, you can get more than that on a tiny little SD card. But it isn’t as if this would be anyone’s primary computer.&quot; - WTF? 4GBs in new Commodore are RAM (just like 64k was in the original). Little tiny SD card is Flash memory; SD cards should be compared to hard disk size, not RAM size. I wasn&#039;t ever expecting to see such mistake on Slashdot!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The original Commodore 64 had a whopping 64KB of memory. The new one has 4GB, which isn’t huge by today’s standards. I mean, you can get more than that on a tiny little SD card. But it isn’t as if this would be anyone’s primary computer.&#8221; &#8211; WTF? 4GBs in new Commodore are RAM (just like 64k was in the original). Little tiny SD card is Flash memory; SD cards should be compared to hard disk size, not RAM size. I wasn&#8217;t ever expecting to see such mistake on Slashdot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darwin Canete</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/commodore-64-is-back-in-business-07145029/#comment-104177</link>
		<dc:creator>Darwin Canete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 05:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=145029#comment-104177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hope this will be imported to the Philippines.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope this will be imported to the Philippines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
