<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Collapse of Moore&#8217;s Law &#8216;in about 10 years&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/collapse-of-moores-law-in-about-10-years-30225268/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/collapse-of-moores-law-in-about-10-years-30225268/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrFlipChip</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/collapse-of-moores-law-in-about-10-years-30225268/#comment-206804</link>
		<dc:creator>DrFlipChip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=225268#comment-206804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nothing original here. This man Kaku is a made for TV Physicist in the sorry tradition of Carl Sagan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing original here. This man Kaku is a made for TV Physicist in the sorry tradition of Carl Sagan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juanjeremy2012</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/collapse-of-moores-law-in-about-10-years-30225268/#comment-206753</link>
		<dc:creator>juanjeremy2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 13:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=225268#comment-206753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[moars law has already been repealed, intel new chips are slower than sandy bridge]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>moars law has already been repealed, intel new chips are slower than sandy bridge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: First Name</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/collapse-of-moores-law-in-about-10-years-30225268/#comment-206611</link>
		<dc:creator>First Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=225268#comment-206611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MOAR&#039;s &quot;law&quot; has been followed only because it&#039;s a convenient schedule to drive the semiconductor industry to. Trust me, we&#039;ll figure out where to go next to keep it up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MOAR&#8217;s &#8220;law&#8221; has been followed only because it&#8217;s a convenient schedule to drive the semiconductor industry to. Trust me, we&#8217;ll figure out where to go next to keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: $15655361</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/collapse-of-moores-law-in-about-10-years-30225268/#comment-206596</link>
		<dc:creator>$15655361</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=225268#comment-206596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We still have ways to go, the industry will stay busy.

The biggest problem (aka challenge) is capital.
In order to continue to drive the technology nodes smaller and smaller you need tons of money.
Billions of dollars and a huge market you can serve. 
5 billion or maybe 10 or one day even 20 billion dollars will need to be put on the table. 
The game is open. 

A chip manufactured in 5 nm will need a huge audience. Otherwise you simply can&#039;t afford to build a new chip or even a new version (aka revision) of it.

Intel knows why they are investing in FPGA start-ups. 
Expect future Intel chips to be more flexible.
What will count is that you produce as many chips of one and the same device (respectively design) as you possible can.

Intel x86 in mobile devices? 
According to sources who have tested the first x86 driven smartphone ARM and x86 are sort of on par. 

That is as of April 2012. 
In several years the picture may well look different. 
x86 for mobile applications may take the lead since Intel may get themselves into a position where they can manufacture devices in incredible volume but still offer some flexibility - which spells: programmable hardware. One device will cover several applications (which essentially was the original idea of the Intel microprocessor anyway).

The smaller the process technology nodes become the more Intel will take the lead.

I expect Apple to move to x86 for iOS. Not today. Not tomorrow. But the day may well come.

My two cents ...

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We still have ways to go, the industry will stay busy.</p>
<p>The biggest problem (aka challenge) is capital.<br />
In order to continue to drive the technology nodes smaller and smaller you need tons of money.<br />
Billions of dollars and a huge market you can serve. <br />
5 billion or maybe 10 or one day even 20 billion dollars will need to be put on the table. <br />
The game is open. </p>
<p>A chip manufactured in 5 nm will need a huge audience. Otherwise you simply can&#8217;t afford to build a new chip or even a new version (aka revision) of it.</p>
<p>Intel knows why they are investing in FPGA start-ups. <br />
Expect future Intel chips to be more flexible.<br />
What will count is that you produce as many chips of one and the same device (respectively design) as you possible can.</p>
<p>Intel x86 in mobile devices? <br />
According to sources who have tested the first x86 driven smartphone ARM and x86 are sort of on par. </p>
<p>That is as of April 2012. <br />
In several years the picture may well look different. <br />
x86 for mobile applications may take the lead since Intel may get themselves into a position where they can manufacture devices in incredible volume but still offer some flexibility &#8211; which spells: programmable hardware. One device will cover several applications (which essentially was the original idea of the Intel microprocessor anyway).</p>
<p>The smaller the process technology nodes become the more Intel will take the lead.</p>
<p>I expect Apple to move to x86 for iOS. Not today. Not tomorrow. But the day may well come.</p>
<p>My two cents &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne McKenzie</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/collapse-of-moores-law-in-about-10-years-30225268/#comment-206572</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne McKenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=225268#comment-206572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wasn&#039;t IBM&#039;s Watson using multiple chips/cpus working on a single problem? Yes Watson was large and unwieldy (and expensive), but, given enough time, I think we&#039;ll all be using miniature Watson-like computers that do an end run around Moore&#039;s Law by simply increasing the number of chips. That should hold us consumer-level computer users until quantum computing is perfected.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t IBM&#8217;s Watson using multiple chips/cpus working on a single problem? Yes Watson was large and unwieldy (and expensive), but, given enough time, I think we&#8217;ll all be using miniature Watson-like computers that do an end run around Moore&#8217;s Law by simply increasing the number of chips. That should hold us consumer-level computer users until quantum computing is perfected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
