http://www.slashgear.com/canon-5d-mark-iii-spotted-in-the-wild-23210416/ Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions Thu, 17 May 2012 17:46:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://www.slashgear.com/canon-5d-mark-iii-spotted-in-the-wild-23210416/#comment-189857 Guest Sat, 03 Mar 2012 18:18:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210416#comment-189857 There is another picture in the same series, of the same guy, that shows a 1DX with the 200-400. Before you hate on the writer, try finding every fact.

]]> http://www.slashgear.com/canon-5d-mark-iii-spotted-in-the-wild-23210416/#comment-188714 akarian2003 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:30:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210416#comment-188714 I think it’s just an issue with unclear writing. Burns may have been talking about the 200-400mm lens separately. Many people assumed that it would be released at the same time as the 5D3. Burns should have said “shown here with 600mm lens” earlier in the article and then started a new sentence talking about the 200-400….. or maybe I’m just giving the author the benefit of the doubt.

]]> http://www.slashgear.com/canon-5d-mark-iii-spotted-in-the-wild-23210416/#comment-188715 akarian2003 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:30:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210416#comment-188715 I think it’s just an issue with unclear writing. Burns may have been talking about the 200-400mm lens separately. Many people assumed that it would be released at the same time as the 5D3. Burns should have said “shown here with 600mm lens” earlier in the article and then started a new sentence talking about the 200-400….. or maybe I’m just giving the author the benefit of the doubt.

]]> http://www.slashgear.com/canon-5d-mark-iii-spotted-in-the-wild-23210416/#comment-178172 Magnus Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:16:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210416#comment-178172 The 200-400mm lens that is marked “600mm”?

]]> http://www.slashgear.com/canon-5d-mark-iii-spotted-in-the-wild-23210416/#comment-178173 Magnus Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:16:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210416#comment-178173 The 200-400mm lens that is marked “600mm”?

]]> http://www.slashgear.com/canon-5d-mark-iii-spotted-in-the-wild-23210416/#comment-175237 izybit izybit Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:19:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210416#comment-175237 My telescope is smaller than that lens!

]]>