<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T to get Samsung Galaxy Note with different features</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/att-to-get-samsung-galaxy-note-with-different-features-16202857/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-to-get-samsung-galaxy-note-with-different-features-16202857/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 02:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blockedsender1</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-to-get-samsung-galaxy-note-with-different-features-16202857/#comment-183049</link>
		<dc:creator>Blockedsender1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=202857#comment-183049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have AT&amp;T put in the skyrocket setting for your data until the us version is released works great on mines]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have AT&amp;T put in the skyrocket setting for your data until the us version is released works great on mines</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Hronek</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-to-get-samsung-galaxy-note-with-different-features-16202857/#comment-169192</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Hronek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=202857#comment-169192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I brought one back from Taiwan but cannot get any smart data plan to work on ATT. It is already unlocked and wors great on Wi-Fi and as a phone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I brought one back from Taiwan but cannot get any smart data plan to work on ATT. It is already unlocked and wors great on Wi-Fi and as a phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thassinger42</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-to-get-samsung-galaxy-note-with-different-features-16202857/#comment-167453</link>
		<dc:creator>Thassinger42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=202857#comment-167453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i will be keeping my Samsung galaxy s2 epic touch from sprint and getting rid of my rooted Samsung infuse 4g for the note..can&#039;t wait!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i will be keeping my Samsung galaxy s2 epic touch from sprint and getting rid of my rooted Samsung infuse 4g for the note..can&#8217;t wait!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acabello34</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-to-get-samsung-galaxy-note-with-different-features-16202857/#comment-166309</link>
		<dc:creator>Acabello34</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=202857#comment-166309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I CANNOT WAIT ! I left Verizon two years ago... I have the Samsung galaxy S II sky rocket and it absolutely rock so I know the note will...Im going to keep my sky rocket as well just in case....Cannot WAIT until a week after New year usually att makes a surprise a week after the New year hope its the note....Ice cream sandwich here we come....yeahhhhhh....ATT  rocks...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I CANNOT WAIT ! I left Verizon two years ago&#8230; I have the Samsung galaxy S II sky rocket and it absolutely rock so I know the note will&#8230;Im going to keep my sky rocket as well just in case&#8230;.Cannot WAIT until a week after New year usually att makes a surprise a week after the New year hope its the note&#8230;.Ice cream sandwich here we come&#8230;.yeahhhhhh&#8230;.ATT  rocks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-to-get-samsung-galaxy-note-with-different-features-16202857/#comment-164992</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=202857#comment-164992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No Exynos do better job, you can find its articles on Internet ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Exynos do better job, you can find its articles on Internet </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-to-get-samsung-galaxy-note-with-different-features-16202857/#comment-164811</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=202857#comment-164811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[C´mon Sprint, bring me one of this with Exynos and WiMAX 4G.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C´mon Sprint, bring me one of this with Exynos and WiMAX 4G.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-to-get-samsung-galaxy-note-with-different-features-16202857/#comment-164780</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 14:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=202857#comment-164780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The real question is: will the US version have NFC? Korean ones do and European ones don&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real question is: will the US version have NFC? Korean ones do and European ones don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-to-get-samsung-galaxy-note-with-different-features-16202857/#comment-164387</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=202857#comment-164387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jesus people....much like the Skyrocket, the AT&amp;T version of the Note requires the Qualcomm SOC for both HSPA+ and LTE.  The Exynos does not support LTE at this moment.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jesus people&#8230;.much like the Skyrocket, the AT&amp;T version of the Note requires the Qualcomm SOC for both HSPA+ and LTE.  The Exynos does not support LTE at this moment.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-to-get-samsung-galaxy-note-with-different-features-16202857/#comment-164288</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=202857#comment-164288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The article said that the snapdragon handles the HSPA+ better than Exynos. Gotta read the article, silly :)&quot;

T-Mobile SGSII is also using snapdragon instead of Exynos to accommodate the faster HSPA service. I have the note and it&#039;s a category 14 device iirc (21.1mbps). Just because two carriers are using HSPA+ doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s the same service. There are different levels of HSPA categories defining the max speeds]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The article said that the snapdragon handles the HSPA+ better than Exynos. Gotta read the article, silly :)&#8221;</p>
<p>T-Mobile SGSII is also using snapdragon instead of Exynos to accommodate the faster HSPA service. I have the note and it&#8217;s a category 14 device iirc (21.1mbps). Just because two carriers are using HSPA+ doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s the same service. There are different levels of HSPA categories defining the max speeds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigmouth</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-to-get-samsung-galaxy-note-with-different-features-16202857/#comment-164274</link>
		<dc:creator>Bigmouth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=202857#comment-164274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does T-Mobile have to do with anything? Also, posters on XDA have been reporting HSPA+ speeds. I follow the forums closely and have yet to read any complaints along these lines.

Again, every report I&#039;ve suggests the Snapdragon is to accommodate LTE, not HSPA+.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does T-Mobile have to do with anything? Also, posters on XDA have been reporting HSPA+ speeds. I follow the forums closely and have yet to read any complaints along these lines.</p>
<p>Again, every report I&#8217;ve suggests the Snapdragon is to accommodate LTE, not HSPA+.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-to-get-samsung-galaxy-note-with-different-features-16202857/#comment-164271</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=202857#comment-164271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T-Mobile is on a higher class HSPA than AT&amp;T and just because you&#039;re connected to &quot;+&quot; doesn&#039;t mean you&#039;re getting the HSPA+ speeds]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T-Mobile is on a higher class HSPA than AT&amp;T and just because you&#8217;re connected to &#8220;+&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean you&#8217;re getting the HSPA+ speeds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigmouth</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-to-get-samsung-galaxy-note-with-different-features-16202857/#comment-164262</link>
		<dc:creator>Bigmouth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=202857#comment-164262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wait, aren&#039;t people getting HSPA+ with the Note on AT&amp;T already?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, aren&#8217;t people getting HSPA+ with the Note on AT&amp;T already?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigmouth</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-to-get-samsung-galaxy-note-with-different-features-16202857/#comment-164261</link>
		<dc:creator>Bigmouth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=202857#comment-164261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the article is mistaken. Everything else I&#039;ve read suggests it&#039;s because the Exynos can&#039;t do LTE. Also, plenty of people are already using the Exynos version of the Note on AT&amp;T and getting HSPA+ with no problem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the article is mistaken. Everything else I&#8217;ve read suggests it&#8217;s because the Exynos can&#8217;t do LTE. Also, plenty of people are already using the Exynos version of the Note on AT&amp;T and getting HSPA+ with no problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tmb993</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-to-get-samsung-galaxy-note-with-different-features-16202857/#comment-164241</link>
		<dc:creator>Tmb993</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=202857#comment-164241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I missed that the first time I read the article and then when I saw it I couldn&#039;t delete my comment lol. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed that the first time I read the article and then when I saw it I couldn&#8217;t delete my comment lol. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Koterba</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-to-get-samsung-galaxy-note-with-different-features-16202857/#comment-164220</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachary Koterba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=202857#comment-164220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Honestly this device wins my vote for best phone of the year. Its innovative, boundary breaking, and beautiful. Once upgraded to ICS it will be pure win.

That said, I ended up going with the Galaxy Nexus instead. Partly because I&#039;m already on Verizon Wireless and was able to grab the Nexus for $175. Also because I&#039;m really excited to see what they do with the next generation of this device (Note II). 

There are some things that just aren&#039;t there, like the faster processor, that will surely be there next round (probably quad-core as well). In the end it would be awesome if my phone could be a portable gaming device, miniature tablet, and phone. They&#039;ve got the tablet/phone down, but the gaming capability just isn&#039;t there yet (and no I&#039;m not talking angry birds). I am waiting on game designers who write games for Nintendo&#039;s 3DS and Playstations Vita to make games for cell phones in general (Latest Fire Emblem would be awesome). I&#039;m excited for the great stuff I&#039;m sure we&#039;ll see next year and until then I will have an awesome stock ICS phone to test out the new platform!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly this device wins my vote for best phone of the year. Its innovative, boundary breaking, and beautiful. Once upgraded to ICS it will be pure win.</p>
<p>That said, I ended up going with the Galaxy Nexus instead. Partly because I&#8217;m already on Verizon Wireless and was able to grab the Nexus for $175. Also because I&#8217;m really excited to see what they do with the next generation of this device (Note II). </p>
<p>There are some things that just aren&#8217;t there, like the faster processor, that will surely be there next round (probably quad-core as well). In the end it would be awesome if my phone could be a portable gaming device, miniature tablet, and phone. They&#8217;ve got the tablet/phone down, but the gaming capability just isn&#8217;t there yet (and no I&#8217;m not talking angry birds). I am waiting on game designers who write games for Nintendo&#8217;s 3DS and Playstations Vita to make games for cell phones in general (Latest Fire Emblem would be awesome). I&#8217;m excited for the great stuff I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll see next year and until then I will have an awesome stock ICS phone to test out the new platform!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-to-get-samsung-galaxy-note-with-different-features-16202857/#comment-164212</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=202857#comment-164212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It supports a higher class HSPA (faster HSPA) which isn&#039;t supported by AT&amp;T to begin with. I will keep my Note with 1.4ghz exynos :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It supports a higher class HSPA (faster HSPA) which isn&#8217;t supported by AT&amp;T to begin with. I will keep my Note with 1.4ghz exynos :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kooperwilliams</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-to-get-samsung-galaxy-note-with-different-features-16202857/#comment-164211</link>
		<dc:creator>Kooperwilliams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=202857#comment-164211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The article said that the snapdragon handles the HSPA+ better than Exynos. Gotta read the article, silly :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article said that the snapdragon handles the HSPA+ better than Exynos. Gotta read the article, silly :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tmb993</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-to-get-samsung-galaxy-note-with-different-features-16202857/#comment-164210</link>
		<dc:creator>Tmb993</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=202857#comment-164210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is awesome but I&#039;m very curious as to why they would put the slower snapdragon into the LTE version...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is awesome but I&#8217;m very curious as to why they would put the slower snapdragon into the LTE version&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
